this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
378 points (98.5% liked)

News

24769 readers
4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered the DOJ to investigate private companies for DEI programs, potentially pursuing criminal charges.

Citing the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against affirmative action, she argues DEI initiatives violate anti-discrimination laws. The directive targets large corporations, nonprofits, and universities, with reports due by March 1.

Legal experts warn this move likely violates First Amendment protections, as courts have upheld employers’ rights to promote diversity.

Civil rights groups are expected to challenge the policy, setting up a major legal battle for the administration.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 77 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They want to criminally investigate private companies for setting their own policies? Real small government and pro business of them. /s

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago

No, they just need a reason to investigate any business they want without legal reasons.

[–] randoogle@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is one of those times where we should apply the phrase "do not comply in advance". They didn't take legal action yet. Make them take legal action before the company changes policies. That's why I'm so mad at companies like Target that just folded immediately.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Translation: Pam Bondi gets in line to lick Trump's ass

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago

She has to have already been doing so since she's got the job.

[–] CgH10N4Co2@lemmy.cafe 9 points 6 days ago

In violation of what law? Lol. Investigate away, dipshits.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

What do you think the chances are that she’ll start with any one of these beauties:

1 Timothy 2:9-15

Likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works. Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness


1 Timothy 2:12-13

I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve


1 Corinthians 14:34-35

The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the Law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.

[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago

What if her employer was ‘guilty’ of that. Would she lose her job if she were employed because of DEI?

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well ain't that just a little fascist and Nazi adjacent.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 231 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh look... An actual weaponized DOJ. Projection of drumps goals strikes again.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

With the qons, it is always projection.

Always.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 175 points 1 week ago (15 children)

"she argues DEI initiatives violate anti-discrimination laws."

Up is down, wrong is right, black is white.

God I hate this country

We now live in a giving country where White makes right.

Well as long as your male.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

policies relating to "diversity, equity, and inclusion" ("DEi") and "diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility" ("DEIA") "violate the text and spirit of our longstanding Federal civil-rights laws" and "undermine our national unity."

Thank God for Lemmy. Reading this made me feel like I was taking crazy pills until seeing your guys's comments. These people are straight up going full 1984 "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

[–] casey@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Blessed are the silent

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not discriminating against brown ppl is discrimination against whites!

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 22 points 6 days ago

"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 week ago (9 children)

We are living through the greatest constitutional crisis of our lifetimes -- maybe since the Civil War. The US has never seen anything happen like this domestically. We are rapidly moving toward the dissolution of the US and civil war.

If the courts do not prosecute Trump and Elon Musk, which is highly likely, the assault on EVERY federal service and source of funds will continue. "Throwing it back to the states" will cause the states to contract -- without confidence in any federal assistance or regulations, states will need to figure it out themselves -- and if they start seeing the federal government as something they need to protect their citizens from...well, why would they remain a part of that federal government? If the US government is completely unreliable due to the massive brain, experience, and regulation drain, what reason do states have to remain a part of that? Especially when the feds want to restrict speech and expression in the way they do.

And if the courts somehow slap down Elon and Trump and they are removed? Then we've got violence from the J6ers and likely more.

We very well might be witnessing the end of the US, as I see it. But maybe someone can offer some counterpoints

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The end of the US was on January 20th. We're just witnessing its death throes.

[–] Ghosthacked@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We're dealing with this because the union fucked up and didn't see reconstruction thru after the civil war.

We had fucking military bases named after confederate generals. That's enough to tell you the identity of this country.

When the next Civil War happens, we don't need any Biden fucking losers olive branching the losers. We've historically done this and what has happened so far? Next time the US beats the confederates, erase their fucking shitty culture of racism and hate.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think the message is pretty clear that the US experiment has run its course and the country just needs to split in multiple parts instead of trying to make things work between people with vastly different interests under the same umbrella.

Let the red States become the third world country they want to be.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

That's surrendering and giving them what they want. Here's a better idea: don't give them anything for free. Make them pay dearly for every millimeter they gain.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is exactly what I’ve been saying for years now. But is there ever any kind of serious talk about secession anywhere by anyone particularly our democratic political “leaders”?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No, it's not bad enough yet. There is nothing in the constitution allowing for secession. Blue state's economies will have to be destroyed before they band together and decide enough is enough.

There needs to be a critical mass, no state is going to do it on their own because the military could just roll over them.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

Reconstruction failed because Lincoln made the mistake of choosing Andrew Johnson to 'reach across the isle' and then was assassinated. And his racist piece of shit replacement did everything he could to obstruct Lincoln's plans.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

We know all the money is being siphoned off to Trump and his goons, and he's trying to destroy every agency, particularly the watchdog agencies, which is exactly what happened in Rome that lead to the fall of the empire. If no one is paying anyone to keep track of legal obligations you no longer HAVE legal obligations.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This guy with 34 felony counts doesn't seem to know the law, what exactly is illegal? Eh, I guess it doesnt matter anymore, nobody is going to do anything about it until things get physical now.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And if you get physical for the right side, you'll get a pardon. See J6, Daniel Perry, etc.

Edit: spelling

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being a woman she should probably fire herself then.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Yeah, she's looking a little bit "DEI" herself, there.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

For what? It's not fucking illegal! Fuck!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, it also was not illegal for the FBI to investigate J6, or the crimes that donvict carried out, etc....but here we fucking are.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

I know... I'm just frustrated...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank fuck they’re doing something about egg prices.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

I hope they find who keeps hiring all the chickens to work in the judicial department, so they can send them back to the farm.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Man, you guys are going to have to fight to get your rights back.

And I don't mean campaigning. You need to stock up on staples and ammo...

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

You voted for a guy who said he'd be a dictator. Now he's a dictator doing dictator things. His not doing dictator things would be surprising, not this.

load more comments
view more: next ›