this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1630 readers
85 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
45
AI: The New Aesthetics of Fascism (newsocialist.org.uk)
submitted 5 days ago by ibt3321@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/techtakes@awful.systems
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No comments on the article but a "tweet this" button new socialist? Really?

E: One comment, small thing I keep seeing pop up and it is starting to annoy me. The article refers to 'the cruelty is the point' thing a lot. Which yes, that is a point, but I don't think that is the driving force of the right and actually looking at it wrong. I think that for rightwingers the hierarchy is the point, and just that inside this hierarchy you are allowed to do cruelty (as long as it reinforces their hierarchy). I have not worked out how to explain this clearly in a short way (I just deleted several paragraphs here), but I think this explains a lot of problems with the US politics. See also how the mostly rightwing democrats keep upsetting their leftwing base when they pick the 'enforce the hierarchy' option every time somebody lesser speaks out (doesn't mean the dems vs repubs have the same hierarchy, dems like the US system, the (current) repubs the white nationalist patriarchal system. This also explains why the dems keep trying to absorb the repubs who fall out of line (or how the dems deal badly with dems who fall out of line, and why this enrages the 'do less cruelty, fuck the system' left)).

Anyway, im close to getting a 2x2 grid (as astute observers will have noted im leaving out the important 'we must do more cruelty' people) and talking about object vs meta level issues here ;). (For the context deprived, those are r/ssc terms, part of the group of people sneerclub dislikes (and for good reason, while object vs meta could be useful here, it is more about which values are important to people, and object/meta is the wrong frame (my joke does expose that object/meta thinking have an implicit valuation of the meta over the object level in it, so joke not joke! (take your meds people)))).

[–] ibt3321@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My interpretation is that, in current circumstances, cruelty is the principal way to enforce hierarchy. But, I might have to give up on trying to understand US politics because the differences between the two parties are shrinking.

The article mainly appeals to me because of I've seen some people claiming that hate towards AI art is "reactionary," when the exact opposite seems to be true when you think about the overall context of the technology. A pretty reasonable argument in favor of this is that human artists sometimes have their work called AI slop, simply because their works were scraped and people recognize some similarities in style. The obvious rebuttal is that this is victim blaming. AI models plagiarize, and misinforms people with the unfortunate side effect of sowing division between us.

Huge agree on the object/meta discourse. It's way more important to talk about specific values than use that binary way of thinking.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

My interpretation is that, in current circumstances, cruelty is the principal way to enforce hierarchy. But, I might have to give up on trying to understand US politics because the differences between the two parties are shrinking.

Yes it certainly is the way to enforce the hierarchy (and some just like to do the cruelty and would join a side that allows them to be cruel), and the difference between the parties seems to be more about what the hierarchy is, and a big risk of having one 'the important part of the hierarchy is following the system/rules' that after the system/rules gets corrupted, they will join in. (This explains also why so many organizations are agreeing in advance with Trump/Musks bs). Anyway, I meant this whole post in 'understand your enemies' way, as a lot of things on the right do not make sense if you only look at the cruelty angle (like the popularity of the 'cuck' insult thing which in the past decade really has taken off (the r-slur now coming back is a really worrying development in all this also btw, as people are now 'allowed to be cruel' again)), which is not to dismiss cruelty btw (I'd take special notice of the people who are now using the system to do performative cruelty on people). It just feels incomplete to me. Also there certainly are factions who just want to be cruel, but they would lash out more to all sides (like how 4channers try to trick other 4channers a lot, trolls be trolls). But I'm just thinking out loud here, I have not put this all together in a well reasoned argument, it is more an intuition that they are not totally sadistic nihilists. And hey, 'the cruelty is the point' is good messaging for the leftwing people/people who are open to being convinced to become leftwingers (all these political opinions not being static in people and all), also contrast this message with the 'they are weird' message.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Jumpscare warning:LW gets mentioned at about 80% into the article.

edit: it appears that there are people who do not know what “LW” means. I made a context-based joke that it was “Lemmy World”. What it really stands for is “Lurk More”

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

lw?

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Lemmy World

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

turns out this was prophecy

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Read the whole thing. Couldn't find any mention of LW. Mind to be more specific of where it is?

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

paragraph starts:

AI is a cruel technology

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That paragraph:

AI is a cruel technology. It replaces workers, devours millions of gallons of water, vomits CO2 into the atmosphere, propagandises exclusively for the worst ideologies, and fills the world with more ugliness and stupidity. Cruelty is the central tenet of right wing ideology. It is at the heart of everything they do. They are now quite willing to lose money or their lives in order to make the world a crueller place, and AI is a part of this – a mad rush to make a machine god that will liberate capital from labour for good. (This is no exaggeration: there is a lineage from OpenAI’s senior management back to the Lesswrong blog, originator of the concept of Roko’s Basilisk.) Moreso even than cryptocurrency, AI is entirely nihilistic, with zero redeeming qualities. It is a blight upon the world, and it will take decades to clear up the mountains of slop it has generated in the past two or three years.

I don't see them saying lemmy.world, or lemmy for that matter.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the other poster was snarking at the person who did not understand, as you also do not

look for the word in there that features l and w. there's only one (I checked)

[–] petersr@lemmy.world -5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Something about aesthetics without a single image in the post?

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

aesthetics is not the domain of purely visual or simply physical

[–] ibt3321@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are links to images. The author correctly assumes that there's no reason to insert examples since they are so easily found.

[–] petersr@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I stand corrected