this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
338 points (99.4% liked)

politics

20346 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't think this has been a local phenomenon either; my impression is that people are doing this nationally.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 58 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It would be terrible for Elon if people started vandalizing all the Tesla showrooms across the country.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

At least one that I'm aware of was intentionally burned.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Attempted arson, not successful arson

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Still fkn dope.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"offensive and hateful," huh?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Calling something a swasticar gets the cops mad. There's a reddit thread with eyewitness accounts somewhere

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Who knew that applying the ol' Foxworthy format could help the whole world brainstorm better?

If, people started vandalizing all the Tesla showrooms across the country, it'd be terrible for Weelon.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Or just all the Tesla's, in general.

I have no sympathy for the owners at this point. It was time to sell years ago. I saw an accident the other day between a cyber truck and a model s... You could hear the laughter and cheering from everyone in traffic.

[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I bought the absolute cheapest model and had to stretch my budget a little in order to do it

I looked to sell mine about 2 years ago, but the resale on it was so bad, I just couldn't afford it.

I have to settle for just never buying another Elon product, even preferring 3rd party chargers instead of superchargers. And maybe get one of those bumper stickers

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you looked recently? Just curious.

[–] thefool@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Two years ago, I could get $35-40k (CDN), and now it's $25k

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m currently driving a loaner Tesla….got yelled at charging it today to “sell your stupid fuckin car!!”

I’m fine with having no sympathy, but the harassment and calls for vandalism I’ve seen on some posts is a little extreme.

Would it be asking too much to direct the criticism at Tesla themselves? Not everyone can afford to get out of the car they’re driving (or like me, are driving one due to circumstance), and being an asshole to them isn’t productive.

For the record, I hate this car.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why? After you've bought it, selling doesn't do anything. It doesn't really hurt tesla or more importantly musk. That's just virtue signaling of the highest order

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Sure it does. Someone who might have put nore money in teslas pockets puts it in the resellers instead. Its one less sale for tesla

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)

While I support this, I am fairly certain that Elon doesn't care. The value of Tesla stock has very little relationship to their ability to sell cars to consumers. He killed the attempts at making a more affordable car that could get much wider adoption by the public in favor of big ugly toys for the wealthy and pivoting towards fleet sales. And that was before he was in a position to basically just tell the government to throw money at all of his various businesses.

In fact, I don't think Tesla dissolving as a company would be enough to slow Musk down at this point. Not when his shitty AI company will be getting paid to replace federal workers, and he has blank checks from NASA and the DOD to prop up Space X. And just wait until Xitter becomes the preferred payment system of the federal government.

[–] eagleeyedtiger 17 points 4 days ago

Tesla stock makes up a big portion of his net worth. The recent drop in the stock price has wiped $12.5 Billion off his net worth. According to Forbes' calculations his net worth has dropped $42.8 billion since the end of January.

He's still ridiculously wealthy, but hurting his companies will definitely be something he cares about.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 days ago

Tesla is most of his personal wealth, it would matter to him. It just might not stop him.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Tesla and Rivian had special deals to promote EVs.

Lawmakers could change how Teslas, Rivians are sold in WA

A set of bills introduced by Washington lawmakers could shake up how electric vehicles like Teslas and Rivians are sold in Washington, touching on a fierce debate that has long divided EV advocates and auto dealerships.

One bill would take away a special provision that has allowed Tesla to offer test drives and sell directly to consumers at physical stores. Another bill would expand the number of EV-only manufacturers, beyond Tesla, that can sell cars directly to consumers.

How EVs are sold in Washington has been a sore topic with EV startups and climate advocates arguing against an older model of auto sales through traditional dealerships. Dealerships have argued in their defense that they represent the future of EV sales that best protects consumers.

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/climate-lab/lawmakers-could-change-how-teslas-rivians-are-sold-in-wa/

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

I've never once in my life considered car dealerships an institution that does anything at all to "protect consumers".

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yeah. The problem with dealers is that fossil cars need more service, and that's where the dealer makes money. So dealers of legacy brands push fossil cars much harder than EVs.

For a dedicated EV brand, having no dealers is a money grab, since you don't need to have the dealer turn a profit.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Aren't there more people making EVs though? It's not just Tesla and Rivian.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

That makes sense, thanks for explaining it to me. I still think there should be all EV's dealerships then. Choosing 2 is kind of weird.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

With how unreliable Tesla cars are I've got doubts