252

Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth rebuked a reporter who questioned why he selected "an underqualified, retired lieutenant general" John Dan "Razin" Caine to replace Joint Chiefs Chairman CQ Brown.

"I'm going to choose to reject your unqualified question," Hegseth responded during a meeting with Saudi officials at the Pentagon.

Brown, the second African American to serve as the nation's top military officer since October 2023, was ousted Friday despite Trump calling him "a fine gentleman and an outstanding leader."

Before his appointment, Hegseth had advocated firing Brown for pushing "DEI, woke bulls--t."

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] baggins@lemmy.ca 121 points 2 years ago

DEI but it's for white men

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 77 points 2 years ago

Firing a supremely qualified Black man to replace him with an unqualified white man is exactly the reason why DEI programs are needed in the first place.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Legacy Hire is the nomenclature I've adopted.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Discrimination, Exclusion, and Indignation

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 years ago

ARSE

Alcoholics

Racists

Sex Criminals

Extortionists

You mean the rapist peter hegseth?

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Him too? Its gonna be harder to find the non-rapist in the administration at this point.

[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Seems to be part of the requirements.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

What an absolute fucking embarrassment.

[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For Hegseth, it was a Tuesday.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I don't think he remembers what day it is as drunk as he seems to be all the time.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

His momma sure is proud. Her little alcoholic crack baby is all grown up

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Hey give him a break, he was shitfaced.

[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 19 points 2 years ago

Should have said "fails to meet requirements outlined in the law without special exemption from the president", and follow up with why a white boy needs/deserves exemption since we're not officially in wartime or other special circumstances that would necessitate such a less qualified white boy hiring

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

What fragile little children.

With guns.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 years ago

Of course he's gonna hire somebody unqualified: he wouldn't know qualified people, he's a fucking TV show host.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 10 points 2 years ago

On top of it all, this was during a meeting with the bonesaw murderers and 9/11 enablers. Just fucking disgusting all around.

[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Unforced error number ? out of ????

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
252 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31317 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS