this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
72 points (96.2% liked)

Star Trek

10608 readers
40 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This one was written by Star Trek: Prodigy's Aaron J. Waltke.

Direct YouTube Link

Direct link to "The Scheimer Barrier, Chapter 4"

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

This one was actually really good, didn't expect that

[–] the_sisko@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago

It's not cannon but at least they are somewhat officially acknowledging the absolute dumpster fire that was the ENT finale.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago

What actually happened here!?

This one was actually funny?

[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I say this one is canon and it's proof that Trip didn't die in enterprise. The hologram just got super inaccurate and twisted as it got passed around with lossy compression in a game of telephone like an old meme.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] IronpigsWizard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was a huge, "Too Many Cooks" (same creator/director) fan way back.

I enjoyed/laughed at what I have watched. The Spock episode was great. Bloopers!

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Too Many Cooks" (same creator/director)

That's the only thing that could have explained this in some way. Love a good bit of absurdism.

[–] Nmyownworld@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised by this one. I think it is amusing. And, not offensive. This episode seems to actually get Star Trek, while gently poking fun. After the first two Very Short Treks, I wasn't going to watch anymore of them. Didn't watch the third one, and I don't plan to do so. I'm glad I saw this one.

[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This one was the best yet

[–] triktrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This was actually funny (unlike the previous ones which were quite cringey).

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@GoodAaron@startrek.website ’s one was the one I’d been most hoping for from the time the Very Short Treks were announced, and so far it’s the only one that hasn’t disappointed me.

I have the sense that they are as a whole targeting at a very narrow audience demographic, principally of Americans who were young adults and teens in the late 90s.

I never quite got how ‘drinking poop’ preschool to 9 year-old boy humour took mainstream hold in Austin Powers (which I otherwise loved), but acknowledge it as having been a thing. I can even recognize intellectually that its in a long tradition of low humour that goes back to the ‘great fart’ of ‘The Miller’s Tale’ in Chaucer.

What I don’t get is why the folks who didn’t age out of this kind of humour seem to thing that there’s currently a huge untapped audience that’s just looking for the kind of stuff we got in the earlier VSTs.

[–] jaelisp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

This one wasn't a dumpster fire like the last few, but I still feel it was a set up without a punchline. Something felt missing at the end for the payoff.

[–] aperson@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

And no Moriarty either. Still, I was amused.