642
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 35-year-old veteran lawmaker, spoke to NPR about her party’s path forward.

She predicts Republicans will face backlash over Medicaid cuts and federal worker firings.

Despite some Democrats suggesting a new immigration approach post-election, she maintains support for a path to citizenship and recently held a know-your-rights seminar that drew threats of investigation from Trump's border czar Tom Homan.

AOC told NPR "everything feels increasingly like a scam" for ordinary Americans while government serves the wealthy well.

Unlike Trump, she opposes drastically cutting government agencies but questions programs like Medicare Advantage.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 125 points 2 years ago

It is a scam. Neo liberals control the democratic party and they serve the elite. They were never going to save us.

We need a true populist movement. The parties haven't served us my entire life.

[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 64 points 2 years ago

Some would say, "we need to seize the means of production," even.

[-] inbeesee@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Grab 'em by the means of production

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

They just let you do it when you're rich

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

I'm 40 years old and I have never felt represented by my government.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

A 40 year old would have been born in 1985. No president has been born after 1961. If you exclude Obama, no president has been born after 1945.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

What do you mean? Musk was born in '71.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Man, that's bleak.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

You change the parties the way the Tea Party and Maga changed the Republicans. You start a faction and then work on taking over the existing party.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

This could be the right way. Unless Democrats cease to exist in their current form they will never save us from the greed machine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thingAmaBob@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago

Maybe this is a hot take, but why don’t we just make all the law abiding undocumented immigrants legal and just move the fuck on? We need a party that will focus on healthcare and education the most as those two things will create a better society in the long run. Having these other individuals able to fully participate in society could be helpful in many ways as well.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 years ago

why?

racism

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 26 points 2 years ago

bEcAuSe ThAt WoUlD bE uNfAiR tO tHoSe WhO dId It ThE "rIgHt" WaY

Which is, of course, a completely bullshit argument. But it nonetheless gets trotted out any time there's a proposal to make something easier for anyone middle class or below.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

One of the biggest problems in America is people thinking that suffering is a necessary part of human existence and people having what you have without suffering is an injustice, unless they're rich.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago

Every time a conservative sees someone getting help they assume it could have been money in their pockets instead. It's sick zero-sum thinking and betrays a total lack of understanding of financial appropriations, tax, really everything, reality even.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

As a general advertisement, not even asking for money, liberal groups should send "fake checks" to people and say:

Trump and Musk shut down USAID and saved the taxpayer $21.7B... Here's your share of the rebate ($0.00). Whoops! We had to pay the millionaires and billionaires first. Better luck next time!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I love how that argument completely ignores all the other advantages that come along with 'doing it the right way'

It's like being on a cruise ship in the ocean that rescues some sailors in distress, and then someone gets pissed because the rescued people didn't buy a ticket like everyone else.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

That's a very apt comparison, and I would bet cold hard cash that there are people who act exactly like that on a cruise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jax@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, according to Trump, the way they did it isn't 'the right way' either. Otherwise they wouldn't be trying to block birthright citizenship.

But hey, expecting a Conservative to wrap their head around an abstract concept is... well, let's just say these are people who need pictures.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

"I would explain it to you, but I don't have the time or crayons to do so"

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

That's what Regan and HW Bush did. But they're all against it now.

One big reason is because minorities tend to be left leaning. This is one of the reasons people are against Puerto Rico becoming a state.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Remember when fucking Reagan gave amnesty to a bunch of people? Ronald Reagan was the biblical devil, and trump is still worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

Remember: If it feels like a scam, it is.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 14 points 2 years ago

Ever try to buy car insurance?

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I just bought car insurance. Switched from USAA to Progressive and saved a shitload. USAA hasn't been a good deal for a while now.

THAT SAID - Progressive is always trying to get me to turn on "accident detection" on my phone. Fuck that, I know exactly what they do with that data, it's not happening.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

All insurance is a scam.

Game of Thrones should have taught you that.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

Yeah I’ve been saying this for a few months now, we are officially in “The Age of the Grifter.” Honestly it makes me a little sick this is what we’ve been reduced to.

[-] Kompressor@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Everything's been a scam for a while especially this bullshit society. Capitalism inherently encourages and drives everything towards scamming people gotta "make profit" and no one dare dictate what's egregious or not because "who are you to say" so there is just no limit to the greed whatsoever. Cutting corners/costs can only go so far until the planes start falling out of the sky or however that saying goes. We're past the terminal end stages of capitalism and they have no remedy for it and we're seeing the cancer mutate in to something else now.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Our gov is taking our tax money and not showing us what they are doing with it. If its not a scam, show us where the money is going.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago

Our gov is showing us what they do with the tax money. It is, in fact, all public information you can get with a couple seconds of digging (and has been that way for a LONG time).

https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/federal-spending/

The only real black boxes of the government are military and espionage spending. Everything else is out in the open.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

That military black box is massive, and the pentagon hasn’t successfully completed one of its past seven audits. This is a prime area for reform and cost cutting, and yet house repugs just voted to add another 100 billion to its budget.

AOC is correct, it’s a grift, and the billionaires and corporations are coming for what little we have left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Does this include all the money that the government is giving to Elon Musk??

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Yes. Our government is actually really transparent. Granted, a lot of this wasn't apparent until DOGE claimed to bring transparency, and then everything they did was shown to be redundant or worse with existing systems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 22 points 2 years ago

I agree. But I absolutely do not trust the richest man in the world, who was not elected at all, in charge of those funds. Dude already has been using it to funnel money into his own projects. You’ve handed the keys to your safe to a known burglar, and now you’re offering him blowjobs as well.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Don't forget that he is also firing people who were investigating his companies.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Just not the uninformed shoddy lie filled way DOGE are.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

This is a dumb take. It's publicly available information

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

No, I think the dumb thing to do would be to assume that the person who was convicted of 30+ felonies concerning a legal campaign financing is being fully transparent about his intentions and the amount of money he shifted over to the worlds, greatest billionaire(Musk). Also don’t forget that Donald Trump was convicted of a charity scandal and now he can’t run a charity inside the state of New York without court ordered supervision.

Those government reports should be 100% truthful but if you’re willing to believe that they are under Donald Trump, then I have a bridge to sell you .

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It feels like it's a swing off the cancel movement and now everyone can just lie without any consequences.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
642 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31338 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS