95
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

It would tie in better with the email analogy, and it could show that they all just provide access to the same network.

What do you think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 47 points 2 years ago

I’m afraid that when I say „my Lemmy provider” people will think I’m referring to my drug dealer.

Lemmy and Molly (foss) are the most addictive. 🤣🤣

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 4 points 2 years ago

“Psst… Hey, you. Wanna buy some SoMe?”

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago

I was thinking the same. Provider is easier to understand, and used in daily life contexts.

  • I changed my Internet provider
  • This electricity provider offers better service
[-] kubica@fedia.io 11 points 2 years ago

How would the word be used in our context? The Fediverse provider?

But I think I associate the word with money related activities and I'm not a fan of that.

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

I would think the jargon would be "I chose fedia.io as my Lemmy provider," or similar for other federated platforms.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

"I recommend feddit.uk as a Lemmy provider for people living in the UK"

"Feddit.org is a good provider for German speakers"

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago

I associate the word with money related activities

That's a good thing. It costs money to provide services to people. The Fediverse is no different.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Yes, thats what I was thinking.

I was thinking about other decentralised networks people may use, and they all seem to use the word "provider":

  • Email provider
  • Internet provider
  • Usenet provider
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago

That's what resonates for me.

We don't have email instances, and email providers similarly block un-desired content, but there's not a big fuss about missing out on specific types of spam. Lol.

Similarly Internet service providers actually also block big blocks of malware providing domains, and accidentally sometimes block some great piracy resources. People who care learn to use a VPN or switch providers. Everyone else doesn't have to think about it.

I'll argue that The Fediverse also carries extremely similar switching cost as an email or Internet provider. For an average user, "Let folks you care to inform know where you moved, and maybe copy over some favorite bookmarks."

Sure, different providers do try to bring different lenses on the same federated content, but most people aren't served well by thinking about it on day one.

I think shifting to the term provider is a lot more honest to the user about what to expect.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Provider has the connotation of being a paid provider for services. While it’s a technically accurate analogy, I prefer the more abstract comparison of considering the fediverse a meeting place rather than a paid service since it’s a mostly volunteer and self hosted network compared to email.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I disagree. Gmail is my email provider. I don't pay for it. (Yeah I know they are taking ad revenue.)

Instance is unnecessary jargon.

[-] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

Indeed, but unfortunately there's no word for a volunteer provider as far as I know.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 years ago

would confuse me because when I hear "provider" I think ISP before anything else

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

I mean, sure, but the internet is a decentralised network! So is lemmy.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago

no, it's a decentralised service on the decentralized internet

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 3 points 2 years ago

Internet provider.

Lemmy provider.

[-] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

E-mail provider

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 years ago

Servers are a better word for it imo. It is what it actually is and average people already understand servers from discord

[-] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Discord servers are just groups. Lemmy "instances" are actual separate instances of Lemmy communicating.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 years ago

I know. What im saying is the word server isnt too technical and is both easier to understand and technically correct

[-] running_system@feddit.org 2 points 2 years ago

"Average people" don't even know what Discord is

[-] TokenEffort@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

I think instance is okay as a term, but defining it as a provider could be helpful. I don't think the fediverse is that complicated anyway, it could be summarized in a paragraph for a baby

[-] freamon@preferred.social 9 points 2 years ago

As a term, 'instance' is already baked into code, databases, and APIs.

If I wanted to use an API to block 'lemmy.world', for example, I'd call 'site/block' with the relevant 'instance_id'. That's already 2 different terms for the same thing ('site' and 'instance'), which isn't great, but adding 'provider' into the mix means you're now saying "if you want to block a 'provider', use the 'site' endpoint with the ID for the 'instance'", which is arguably worse.

[-] froggycar360@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago

I like server better

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I wouldn't even mention anything about servers or how it works, since most anyone I would even tell about Lemmy won't understand the technical details, nor would they care. It would only confuse them and push them away.

Just hook them up with an instance they will fit into, and have them use the site. I really think that a lot of the other tech nerds here are overthinking it and trying to get non-tech minded people to switch by giving them technical details that do more harm and cause more confusion than simply having them use the site without knowing jack shit about it other than "it's like Reddit but not shitty."

That's really all you gotta tell most people; "it's like Reddit (or Twitter if you're trying to talk up Mastodon), but not shitty."

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Sure, but then questions like "why do these subreddits have an @ symbol?" happen, or the dreaded default "local" sort causes problems.

[-] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I use this approach sometimes and it really works. Provided it's the erm.. simple type of crowd that doesn't ask too many questions lol. They'll wander around and figure it out. If they do, congratulations😂

[-] confuser@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago

I agree, let's make it more friendly to people wanting to start a fediverse provider as a business so a big company can't come in and gobble up everyone

[-] erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

I just say server hosts

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

That's fantastic. Provider avoids the mostly baseless FOMO (fear of missing out) that instance can invoke.

I think provider more clearly communicates that the majority of the desirable content is going to be available the same through any provider.

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I like it. The reasoning's good.

I hate the term "instance". It's hopelessly geeky (it derives from object-oriented programming). It brings to mind nerds and gamers in basements.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I thought it was just an instance of the lemmy software, for example?

[-] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Yes, I know what an instance is, but I never thought that was what people meant.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Call them States ... like states within a federation.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure, go ahead. Technically it's not 100% correct. I mean lemm.ee wouldn't be your provider, it'd be the people operating the server who provide the service to you... But I think it's close enough. Only issue I can see is the term "provider" usually being used with commercial services. Like a cellphone provider or ISP. So I'm not sure if people start to think this costs $10 a month or something and is run by for-profit businesses... But we also use the word "provider" for free things, so I'm not entirely sure about that. But generally speaking I think we use different terminology because we don't think of the Fediverse as a product.

[-] Palladiumasteroid@piefed.social 3 points 2 years ago

People can perfectly understand terms like instance or server...if they are explained to them.

They are also accustomed to concepts like social media and social network that can also be used to explain the Fediverse. Each server is its own social media platforms interacting with eachother through a distributed social network.

But, I actually think the Fediverse require an intermediate point between social media and social network, or something above it.

If the Fediverse (including in this case all decentralised protocols like ActivityPub, Zot/Nomad, Diaspora, Ostatus, AT Proto, etc) is a Social network and each particular instance it's own social media platforms that interact within the network, the software they run and the community they form part of within the wider fediverse is an intermediate stage between social medium and social network.
Now, if each server/instance are social media platforms and the software they run are the social network; the protocol or protocol they use is/are a network of networks and the Fediverse a network of networks of networks of social media platforms.

[-] JupiterRowland@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Go ahead. Try to force that upon Friendica that has called its instances "nodes" for almost 15 years now.

Or Hubzilla that not only calls them "hubs" but also resists any and all cultural or technological influences from anything that wasn't created by Mike Macgirvin.

Also what if I told you that (streams) and Forte call them "communities"? You know, like Lemmy's and PieFed's "subreddits"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Die4Ever@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

usually when I tell someone what an instance is, I throw a few synonyms in there

I feel like just saying "instance/proxy" can help, providers sounds good too, also gateways, servers, relays...

I made an old discussion about this actually

https://programming.dev/post/3658116

https://programming.dev/post/3658268

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Hey, someone had the same thought as me! https://programming.dev/post/3658268/3322305

[-] squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

FSP = Fediverse Service Provider

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

That doesn't sound too bad ngl.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
95 points (90.6% liked)

Fediverse

43887 readers
16 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS