this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
332 points (98.3% liked)

politics

21175 readers
3955 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump's economic policies, particularly his tariffs, are proving disastrous after being "sanewashed" by media during the campaign.

After making tariffs central to his campaign, he twice imposed them—only to backtrack amid market turmoil. Despite clear evidence that tariffs are taxes that raise prices, his allies continue pushing economic falsehoods.

Meanwhile, Trump’s pledge to balance the budget contradicts his record, as he added $2.1 trillion to the deficit, while Democratic presidents have historically reduced it.

His proposed $7 trillion tax cuts, paired with $4.5 trillion in spending cuts, would create massive deficits and harm working-class Americans.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whirlpoolbrewer@lemm.ee 24 points 7 hours ago

When you understand that crashing the economy makes him and wealthy investors richer, it makes sense what he's doing. The sane washing is because the people telling you it makes sense are owned by people who stand to make a lot of money. If people lose their homes, that building doesn't just disappear. It gets bought by investors for cheap who then rent it out. Collapsing economies is how wealthy collect more assets and passive income. A great explanation here by Gary Stevenson: https://youtu.be/XCnImxVWbvc

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 70 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

There is no 200 IQ 4D chess plan. He just wings it as he goes. He says and does whatever “feels good” to him at the moment with zero regards to consequences, consistency or truth. He doesn’t consult experts, he doesn’t study anything because he thinks he knows everything about everything already. He is simply lucky when things go his way and is really good at shifting blame when they don’t.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He's not even good at shifting blame. He has an audience that believe quite literally everything he says.

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

That's decades of lead poisoning for you!

Makes me wonder what the microplastics have in store for us? If all we get is an "I love you" from our Costco greeter and hand jobs on the menu at Starbucks we'll be lucky.

[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I'm pretty sure the "4d chess genius" thing was satire to start that just got Poe's lawed.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

at least during his first presidency he had a well-oiled infrastructure to rationalize and capitalize on any bullshit that came out of his mouth. He doesn't have those people around anymore.

Also this is why I've given up on "conservative intellectuals". They claim interesting things that could make sense in certain contexts (even if I disagree with those), but the moment trump says something, they abandon these values and bend over backwards to rationalize his stupid shit.

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

No. Over use of adjectives here. Better to be concise.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 66 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Again. Why do people insist his policies are smart?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 9 points 7 hours ago

They don't think it's possible to be rich and not smart. To them his wealth has a halo effect on everything else he does.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 44 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SillySausage@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 9 hours ago

I'll never not laugh at this scene. So so good.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago

Its a cult full of morons. Its that simple.

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 33 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because Trump said so. Don't you believe Trump? He's the smartest!

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 hours ago

He said so himself, so it must be true. People who disagree are publicly reprimanded by him so they must be wrong!

/s, because we’re in that place again….

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Because they’re in denial about being conned by an idiot. After all, if you get conned by an idiot, what does that make you? It’s easier for them to pretend he’s got some genius plan.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If bankrupting a casino wasn’t enough then idk what else evidence these dumb fucks need

[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

It bugs me when people cite the casino going bankrupt as an example of his idiocy, I'm sure it was an example of his malice.

I'm sure if you look Into that casino failing, he probably stole the funds. Why keep a business going making a few million a year and pay taxes on that, when you could take like 20 million right now, and not pay taxes on it.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It bugs me more because it wasn't a casino, it was three casinos.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 minutes ago

My working assumption is that they were a money laundering front.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago

It can be both things. He’s bad at business because his solution to running everything equates to some type of fraud rather than any talent or skillful thinking. It doesn’t take skill to commit fraud, you just have to be a piece of shit.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

To be fairish, he's more a lying sack of shit than an idiot, but that aside....

[–] Doesnotexist@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Porque no los dos?

Don’t deport me.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

I guess I should've been clearer.

He's obviously both. He's more of a lying sack of shit than he is an idiot.

And as I just tried to point out elsewhere, that's not to say that he's not an idiot - just that he's even more of a liar.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not sure what he’s done to get the benefit of the doubt on intelligence. He literally asked if it was possible to cure COVID by injecting bleach or shoving a UV light up your ass. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52407177

His own staff members have called him a “moron.” And he’s bankrupted 6 companies. If there’s evidence he’s smart, I haven’t seen it.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

I didn't say he was smart - I said he's even more a lying sack of shit than he is an idiot.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Despite clear evidence that tariffs are taxes that raise prices, his allies continue pushing economic falsehoods.

Evidence such as the definition of the fucking word?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago

He’s proven it at least once a year since 1980.

[–] sqw@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 9 hours ago

i dont remember much sanewashing in the media, maybe i consume biased media but pretty much everything i saw said tarrifs were an likely to cause recession.