694
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 85 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

War on drugs - drugs won

War on terror - terror won

War on woke - 🤞

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

It's never been about defeating those things, it's about expanding power using them as an excuse.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago

Exactly.

  1. War on Drugs - reduce minority voice in government
  2. War on Terror - PATRIOT Act, or whatever its current incarnation is
  3. War on Woke - probably government access to medical records and/or privacy generally, but I guess we'll see
[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

War on Drugs - reduce minority voice in government

And increase incarceration of certain people to expand legal slavery under the 13th amendment.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

expand legal slavery

Maybe in some states, but in many (most?), they just become a burden on taxpayers.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

War on poverty 😬

[-] AllHailZorglub@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Considering how tired and sleepy I feel, they may be winning this one.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

interesting

[-] smol_beans@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

His one job was to create profit for weapons manufacturers and he did that job very very well

His job was to do Israel’s bidding and remove Saddam.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Saddam and his family were genuinely awful, to be fair.

Yes, but that’s not really why they removed him.

Plenty of horrible people ruling countries that America has no interest in removing as it doesn’t suit their needs.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, like Russia...

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You're right, they don't go in and remove every dictator, and this one was because they had an ulterior motive.

Nonetheless, they did a good thing.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I always say, I celebrate Saddam getting fucked hard while still realizing the whole thing was fucked up. Especially since it was lead by a moron / lunatic

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

That's a nice side effect.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago

Declaring war on a concept has never gone well for the states, has it? Drugs, terror, women, the list goes on.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

The war against woman is sadly going strong right now. More than drugs and etc ever has.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 13 points 2 years ago

Declaring war on a concept has never gone well ~~for the states~~, has it?

Ftfy.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Matter of perspective. Ask halliburton how's it going...

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[-] Kurroth@aussie.zone 9 points 2 years ago

The US isn't known for winning wars historically.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Seems like it has worked pretty well:

  1. Vietnam/Korea/etc - most people hate communism
  2. War on Drugs - police get to arrest minorities, and felons don't get to vote (suppress minority vote)
  3. War on Terror - PATRIOT Act is still alive and well, it just has different names now

With the right perspective, they seem pretty successful to me, you just need to peek behind the curtain.

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Declaring war on anything. They need the Europeans to invite them to the final hours of one to chalk a W.

[-] Mniot@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

I'm holding out hope that we can still turn it around and defeat Santa Claus

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Just like the "war on drugs" was never about stopping drugs, this was never about stopping terrorism.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

When you wage a war on an enemy, you win when the enemy is dead. When you wage a war on an idea, there's no final end point.

[-] tkmtlmike@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

No, man! He said war OF Terror...

[-] Patrik@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Fizz 10 points 2 years ago

What is anon complaining about he did his job. He declared the war. Then he kicked the can down the road for someone else to get the job of winning it.

[-] rImITywR@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago
[-] Stepskippin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

New skill unlocked: "Lie with energy and in a few years fact checking becomes diabolical."

[-] Meep@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

First they funded, supported, and grew the terrorism, and THEN, they fought the terrorism. Then they funded other terrorists. But it's always in countries with natural resources they want.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Are we really going back this far, right at this moment?

[-] Kurroth@aussie.zone 8 points 2 years ago

Mate, I was traumatised when Dragonball z and Pokémon were interrupted before school and this dude was on all the TV stations.

Nothing has been any good sense.

[-] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 years ago

Gonna be honest, the idiom/meme "had one job" is almost never correct or appropriate and the role of president is certainly a situation where it does not apply. I find it irksome, most of the time, when people say/type it, without actually thinking things through and applying it appropriately. Don't care if it is an unpopular opinion because it is a fact that it is used incorrectly the vast majority of the time and haters gonna hate, only true appreciators gonna appreciate.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
694 points (99.0% liked)

Greentext

8911 readers
447 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS