this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1656 readers
37 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luthis 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck that guy, fuck act, fuck anyone trying to take away public holidays. Ill take off Jan 2nd as a sick day and use it to piss on the door handles of acts office. Fuck them to hell. ..and take away fair pay?? OH MOTHERFUCKER

[–] Rangelus 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't get why Labour doesn't just run a campaign just repeating what these fuckers say they're gonna do.

[–] Ilovethebomb 7 points 1 year ago

He's talked me out of voting for him, that's for sure. Safety regulations are written in blood, and building regulations are written in rotten and collapsed buildings.

Absolute muppet.

[–] Xcf456 13 points 1 year ago

ACT courting the asshole vote by promising to make things worse in every way

[–] Dave 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the party proposing to remove the building act, that specifies building standards. We don't need building standards in an earthquake prone country, because if the buildings aren't good you won't be able to get insurance so the market makes sure the buildings are still up to scratch. Not making this up.

The only surprising thing about this party is that they have so many supporters. But I fully believe most of their voters have no idea about their policies, and instead are voting for them because people want a change of government and don't like the current National party.

[–] Ilovethebomb 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, removing the building act is utterly moronic, I'm surprised their opposition isn't making more noise about it.

What a clown show of an election.

[–] Rangelus 3 points 1 year ago

Wholeheartedly agree.

[–] Xcf456 6 points 1 year ago

It has form too - this kind of thinking is how we ended up with the leaky building crisis

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they were in anyway intellectually consistent they'd also be proposing removing drivers license requirements - insurance would keep unsafe drivers off the road, and would totally be consolation for families of people killed by rich people

[–] Dave 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You better hope they don't hang out on lemmy. If they announce this as their next policy I'm blaming you!

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't imagine anyone in Act hanging out on the fediverse - open, decentralised community run by volunteers? At best that's a commons that needs a good tragedy, at worst that sounds like communism

[–] Dave 1 points 1 year ago

I dunno, a "free speech" type instance seems like just the place some Act voters may hang out. Free to speak their minds in ways that mainstream social media would censor.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Removing day-after-new-years as a holiday, what a crap idea. Fucking smeg head