this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
43 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35865 readers
2157 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.w.on-t.work 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

On the software side, we already have PeerTube. It's just the logistics of hosting video are way too expensive for most people to be able to cover:

  • You need drives to store all those videos, preferably in several quality and codec variants so everyone can watch them.
  • You need the bandwidth to serve all those videos. PeerTube can "smooth over" the initial new upload bump by using WebTorrents, which is the least worst solution if you quietly ignore all the "but muh IP address" people, but once people stop watching at the same time, you're back to square one.
  • Transcoding requires powerful and specialized hardware. Nobody in their right mind will serve videos the same way they're uploaded, especially with the rise of new codecs like VP9 or god forbid AV1, which you simply can't encode on a consumer CPU unless you're fine waiting hours/days for a single upload to go through.
[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, i don't see how hosting video is feasible in a decentralized way.

However, streaming is a different story. I actually think PeerTube makes a lot of sense as a Twitch alternative.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't mind paying a subscription for video if I knew the money actually went to the creators, but YouTube is so anti creator that I don't want them taking a cut.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I think it works if you have something akin to a youtuber coop. Something like nebula but with the fediverse in mind.

[–] minorninth@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spending an hour on Reddit or Twitter means downloading a few megabytes of content.

Spending an hour on YouTube means downloading a few gigabytes of content. The cost to serve that is massive.

YouTube lost money when Google bought them. It continued to lose money for years. It was only after YouTube finally got large enough and their ad targeting got good enough that they started to turn a profit on YouTube.

I'm really skeptical that anything other than a big tech company could provide a similar platform like that for free.

Sure, it could work if you could get people to pay $10/month, like YouTube Premium, but people wouldn't do that without there being enough content to make it worthwhile. It's a chicken-and-egg problem. The only way to get past that point is with a massive amount of initial investment.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't see how it's possible to provide that service for free, and I'd be willing to pay for YouTube premium if they didn't treat their creators like crap. The creators that do well on YouTube are the worst because they play the clickbait bullshit algorithm game and all the creators I like that put out high quality content have a hard time making a living

[–] neonpeon@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I have pinned video to IPFS, before, and it streamed well from an IPFS gateway. I lack an understanding of what the impact to a gateway would be, though, if many users were doing this.

One thought would be software that would automatically pin any video you viewed, or the partial content you viewed, for a period of time. Popular videos with many views per day would also be supported by many peers to pull from. Videos viewed infrequently might be pinned only by the content creator or a handful of others. The like/upvote concept could be tied into pinning, even on a scale such that an ordinary upvote would subscribe you to, say, 3 days of pinning, and a super-upvote would subscribe you to 20 days.

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I would rather post this link for peertube: https://joinpeertube.org/

[–] Fizz 2 points 1 year ago

How do I find videos on peer tube. I checked a few instances but there wasn't much. Where as odysee has a lot of the content that I watch from yt.

[–] IceSea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Someone else already pointed towards odysee.com. However, I think it speaks volumes that the best video explaining the concept I found on youtube.... even though the exact same creator has a channel on odysee.com as well.

However, there are a couple of youtubers also present on odysee, like "3Blue1Brown", "Veritasium" or a bit more niche Jack Rhysiders podcast... think I'm going to test this over the couple of days/weeks for a bit

[–] pensa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just checked out Odysee for the first time, and the recommendations were mostly right-wing conspiracy crap listed in the same category as Veritasium. No thanks, that's my main complaint about youtube these days.

[–] IceSea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah, I fully understand that. I tried it a couple days ago for the first time and I'm still not sure what to make of it. However, I recently opened youtube on freshly installed PC recently and wasnt logged in... oh boy.. all the the influencers influencing about nothing... the reaction videos about reaction videos... and why is everyone still poor when there is so much great advice out there to get rich? I hope Odysee allows to ignore all that crap over time... otherwise I wont stick around long either... we'll see :)

[–] pensa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A feature like "Don't recommend this channel" that actually worked is all it would take for me. A downvote feature would help keep the crap from being recommended in the first place. Youtube once had both features, fully functional. I don't know exactly when but they removed those features but kept the facade. Complete fucking assholes.

As my own bit of disobedience I "watch" muted 4K videos as a screensaver when I'm not at the computer. Of course ublock origin and privacy badger are always running so no ad revenue to them but I abuse their service with max bandwidth use.

[–] Anitabath097@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just use newpipe (still uses YouTube's stuff tho)

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it isn't federated but playeur isn't bad.