277
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A showdown may be imminent at the Supreme Court now that the Justice Department has hedged again.

A federal judge denied the Justice Department’s request for more time on Friday to explain its plans for returning a man to the U.S. after the government deported him to a notorious prison in El Salvador.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis issued a two-page order Friday after Justice Department prosecutors cited a need for a “reasonable period of time to review the Supreme Court’s order,” issued late Thursday that ordered the government to “facilitate” the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the U.S..

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 123 points 2 years ago

I hope that judge is pissed off enough to start jailing Administration officials for contempt.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the laugh, I needed that.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 years ago

Imagine how different America would be if they actually held people accountable for their actions and crimes.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago

I was SCREAMING for it after the Bush administration, but Obama and the rest of weak-willed Dem weenies let them off the hook.

If Obama had shown bold leadership when he needed to, MAGA never could have taken root. If Biden had shown bold leadership after Jan 6, HitlerPig and his henchmen woukd be in either Gitmo or the Supermax, and their followers would all be claiming they were never MAGA.

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Republicans are evil. Democrats are useless.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Very succinct. You said in a few words, what I always need a few paragraphs to say. Nice job.

[-] Parsizzle@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Genuine question: who exactly would do that? Like I understand their are bailiffs who act as "police" in the courtroom but who would be the ones who physically arrested the Administration officials? The police or other members of the executive branch?

[-] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Presumably the Marshalls.

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's ridiculous that the US government is paying a foreign government to detain prisoners on its behalf and seems to be claiming it didn't put anything in the contract about a way to get the prisoners back.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 52 points 2 years ago

I strongly suspect that this was all by design. If they jail them in US prisons, it's very easy for them to be released. When they're being held by a foreign government, it's very difficult to force them to release them, especially when they know the president doesn't actually want them released in the first place. I'd even wager there's an under the table agreement that they won't release them, even if pressed.

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Well, it's not even under the table. The vile price of shit warden publicly said something to the effect of, "Yeah, none of them are ever seeing their homes again"

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

There's also the fact that the prisons are NOTABLY deadly. So if the administration winds up actually being forced to release a person, they can just have an "unfortunate accident" and now that's ANOTHER court case to determine whether they have to ship the body back (which again, is easily handled by "well it's in one of these mass graves.")

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Given that they admitted he was detained by mistake in the first place, I think "evil" is the word I'd use.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

It just temporary, until they finish the 30,000 bed facility theyre building in Guantanamo.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Suuure. Temporary. Just like when IT strung that wire across the ceiling...

[-] grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

And like when I had to move offices to make room for a temporarily displaced group that's still there 2 years later. They were supposed to be gone by summer.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I want to see Luigi run for office, since the precedent has been set that running for office is a way to escape consequences for crimes

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Start sending US Marshals to the DOJ to arrest a few higher ups for contempt of court and remind them that the judiciary has a branch of law enforcement too.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

The US Marshals are actually organized under the DOJ. Meaning they'll just fire any Marshal that obeys that order.

[-] smayonak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They teach in school that the court's weakness is that it lacks an enforcement mechanism. It seems that the founding fathers believed that broken judiciaries are balanced by the common person's conscience. This is back when people like Benjamin Franklin was able to influence thousands of literate, land owning Americans through his periodicals.

They did not anticipate that eventually the Russians and oligarchs would create mass influence disinfo campaigns using cable news, email, and social media.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The US Marshals are the enforcement mechanism

[-] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Controlled by the DOJ and Executive Branch.

[-] smayonak@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

https://theharvardpoliticalreview.com/supreme-court-reform-judicial-power-accountability/

They are powerful because the various branches of government follow their rulings. But if the executive doesn't then we have a problem.

[-] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

SCrOTUS is spineless. They will kiss his slimy ass.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

It's what they were appointed to do.

When the pendulum swings back and we put the fascists to the wall we can't forget SCOTUS

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

I really hope you're joking. We shouldn't advocate shooting fascists if they are in custody. That's a waste of bullets. Drown the fuckers in a pillow case instead.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Waste of a perfectly good pillow case. 🤨

[-] floppybutton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 2 years ago

How do we know he’s even alive? They were so sure he’d never go home they may have simply killed the prisoner.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 2 years ago

Possible. The other possibility is that they absolutely do not want a first hand account of what's going on inside to be available to the press.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

ABC just had a reporter in another part of the prison, and they pack 80 prisoners to a cell, with 2 toilets, and NOTHING else.

That's the part of the prison they didnt mind showing on international television.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because if he were dead, they'd happily announce it, just to make the Libs scream, and scare the shit out of any undocumented people.

Right now he's just Schroedinger's Political Prisoner.

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Uh oh! A VERY STERN LETTER is ABOUT to be MAYBE Written!

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

They'll return him in a body bag.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Nah, he'll be the next one sent to that prison and never be seen again.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

They wouldnt waste money on a body bag.

[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Is it time to pack it in and admit that Trump is a dictator yet?

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
277 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31351 readers
2516 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS