this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
76 points (94.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35865 readers
2192 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)

Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.

Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.

Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.

Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.

Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.

Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.

Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.

Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ja2@lemmy.world
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Rooki@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
L3s@lemmy.world
76
The Planet, some string and a bell. (feddit.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by Oneeightnine@feddit.uk to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Okay.

So we've got an entirely flat surface that also happens to be the exact same length as the earth's surface.

If you had one continuous piece of string that went from one end of that flat surface to the other, and on one end there was attached a bell... would you be able to ring the bell by pulling on the other end of string?

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I did some numbers because it sounded fun.

Earth's diameter is 41.804 million feet. I'm not sure if you meant that or Earth's circumference when you said "Earth's surface", but I figure either one is gonna get us a really big number.

The first result I can find for string comes in a pack that weighs 2.89oz and contains 328 feet of string.

Using that as our standard, you would need 127,452 packs of string (assuming you find a way to perfectly attach them without wasting any length on knots).

127,452 * (2.89 / 16) = 23,021 lbs of string total.

So if we ignore the string stretching, compressing, or breaking, you'd only need to be able to pull 11ish tons of string to ring the bell!

EDIT:

Just for fun: Assuming the motion of the string travels at the speed of sound (I have no idea if it actually would, it just sounds right), there would be about 10.5 hours between you pulling the string and the bell ringing on the other side.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just for fun: Assuming the motion of the string travels at the speed of sound (I have no idea if it actually would, it just sounds right)

It is true in principle. But the speed of sound is different, depending on the material. For that string we can assume it to be roughly 10 times faster than in the air.

would be about 10.5 hours between you pulling the string and the bell ringing

~ 1 hour then.

[–] piecar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't the motion of the string move at the speed of the pull!? Assuming no compression.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Assuming no compression

Compression and expansion is real. The first part of the string moves with your hand, at the same speed as your hand moves. But then it takes some time until further parts of the string - or the final part of the string - even start with their motion. Ok? And here we were talking about how fast this "beginning of the motion" travels forward through the string. That's the speed of sound.

[–] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, but what if there is no compression or expansion? What if it's a rigid string already stretched out just enough to be expanded completely but not enough to move the bell? Or maybe a thin wire of the same weight?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Okay, but what if there is no compression or expansion?

That means, the speed of sound is infinite in your material. It doesn't happen in this world.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Physics. The force you place on that string will effect the far end only at a rate no sooner than the speed of sound thru said medium.

The speed of sound in metal is about 17000 feet per second. Of materials on earth it has some of the fastest rates of transfer. But if you had a metal rod 17000 feet long and pushed one end a foot, the other end wouldn't move a foot till a second later. It will compress.

Interestingly a neutron star has material that is so densely compacted that the speed of sound thru that material is approaching that of the speed of light.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

need to be able to pull 11ish tons of string to ring the bell

But the weight of the string isn't the force you need to pull.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not? If I try to pull a toy car alomg using a big thick rope, the weight of the rope is relevant, not just the weight of the toy car.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why not?

When you want to lift it up vertically, then the force that you need is exactly the same as the weight.

But when you push or pull it forward on a surface, you need a different force.

Push a golf ball on the table: you need very small force, much less than it's weight. Suck the same golf ball through a garden hose: you need much more force.

You want to look up "coefficient of friction" in your books.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The force of friction is dependent on its weight (or more specifically the force of normal) but not only its weight

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It kind of is. That is still 11 tons of mass. To ring a bell, you need to create some velocity on the striker. Pull a 11 ton mass in a frictionless environment will result in an extremely slow rate of acceleration. But in the spirit of the post, I suspect they are not considering how hard they are ringing the bell.

You are technically right though. Even blowing on a string long enough and you could accelerate it up to speeds approaching that of light. Providing there is no friction.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would you use packs of string? Just leave the manufacturing machine running and don't cut it into packs.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Is the string a massless, frictionless, magic physics string that doesn't stretch? Yes, you can ring the bell.

Normal real-world string? Probably not.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

It depends what the string is made of. When you tug on one end of the string, you create waves that travel the length of the string at the speed of sound. The speed of sound depends on the medium, so if the speed of sound in the material that the string is made of is 50mph for example, then the wave generated by pulling the string will propagate at that speed until it reaches the other end.

The other consideration is the weight of the string. If you go to tug on one end of the string, but the rest of the string weighs thousands of pounds, then you probably won't be able to tug it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I couldn't, no. But I'm very lazy and, as you said, it's all the way over there

[–] Boscrossos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A string that long that doesn't sag to the ground or break is already physically unlikely, but assuming it exists it would probably stretch enough to compensate for the movement. So I'd say no, unless you had a perfectly rigid string.

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I should have emphasized that the string is perfectly taught, has no slack, isn't affected by things like the wind and can't break.

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How dense is it? A string that long would have a lot of mass, which you’d have to overcome to accelerate the string to a speed that would ring a bell.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

This raises another important question: what sort of bell? A taut string attached to a clapper isn’t going to do much; you release the string and it won’t hit the other side. Unless it’s one of those bells where the bell also pivots the other direction when you pull the clapper.

Or is it a bicycle bell where the act of pulling the lever rings the bell?

[–] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What about gravity and friction though? Because as it stands now, if the string was in a frictionless environment and was unaffected by gravity, then yes, you’d be able to ring the bell. However, the friction between the string and the earth over that kind of distance would require more pull strength than the string itself would be able to handle without breaking, unless it was made of some crazy strong material like some kind of nanocarbon alloy or something like that.

[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

This truly is the string theory the people deserve

[–] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since we're doing strings around the Earth, here's the simplest, most unintuitive fact in geometry:

Say you have a string wrapped taut around the planet (purely spherical), like a belt. You want to raise that string up so that it's one meter above ground all the way around the planet. How much more string do you need?

I'll give you a hint. You don't need to know the radius of the Earth to know the answer.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

c = pi x d

So, to increase d by 2 meters (cause d = 2 x r), that's 2 X pi, or 6.28 meters for string?

[–] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

To really emphasize it, the same amount of extra string would be needed if it was instead wrapped around a small marble at first and the diameter expanded by the same amount.

[–] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I'm bad at math. Can you explain why we've decided to multiply pi by 2? Is there an articulable reason or is it just a rule?

c+x= pi * (d+2) in this case, right? So where did that multiply pi by 2 come from?

[–] reattach@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Distribute the pi on the right side of your equality, and replace c with pi*d:

c+x = pi*(d+2)

pid+x = pid + pi*2

x = pi*2

To generalize for an height h,

x = pi2h

Edit: I did some weird markup, but won't be fixing it

[–] TheActualDevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, I see now. I missed some pretty basic math there with that distribution. That makes sense now, thank you!

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sorry that we don't all have string factories at our beck and call...

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one has really answered you so here you go. Yes you would be able to. It’s not instant though because information and energy cannot break the speed limit of the universe (speed of light). So essentially you’d pull the string and a few seconds later the bell would ring. Extend the string to the sun and it would take 8ish minutes for the bell to ring.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Speed of light is a lower limit but it would actually be the speed of sound in the material of the string that matters, so likely much slower than C

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The speed of light is so much faster than the speed of sound, and that's why sometimes you think someone is bright at first until you hear them talk.

:-)

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Good question. Many good answers. Put them aside and you still got a string made of multiple fibers that rub against each other. I'd guess that after a few hundred yards (depending on the string), the energy of your pull would be turned into heat by internal friction alone.