923

Doesn't even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 190 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

This is the oath he had to make when he took office.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

Right, but was he lying when he said it? He's not sure.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

He had his fingers crossed...

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

If I recall, he didn't even place a hand on the Bible.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Pretty crazy that it's sworn in the Bible when the state is supposed to be separated from the church

[-] Mooncheeze@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty sure each person chooses a document/book to swear on that is core to them. So most people in the US would choose the Bible because they identify as Christian, but if a Jewish person or Muslim person was sworn in they could choose the Torah or Quran. And a non-religuous person could choose anything that they could convinceably argue is important/core to their values.

Disclaimer: I did no research right now to confirm this but that's what I remember.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember one politician being sworn in with a stack of comics.

Found it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

You think he was awake for that part?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 134 points 1 year ago

Pressed whether his administration is following the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which says no person "shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," Trump said he wasn't sure.

"I don't know. It seems – it might say that, but if you're talking about that, then we'd have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials," he said. "We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth."

It might say that? Might? This isn't something that is debatable you hippopotamic dung heap. That's what it fucking says.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

"Well yeah it says that but it'd be pretty inconvenient, so..."

[-] nieminen@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for the new word!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, 3 million trials to catch the thousands of criminals in his own words... or maybe instead of trials first, they could maybe only be rounded up if there is any actual reason to believe they are a criminal in the first place. Then it would only be thousands of trials and all the problems being caused by rounding up 900+ innocent people per 1 criminal, would all of a sudden go away.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 116 points 1 year ago

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

They don't care. All they care about is their in-group is strong and the out-group is punished. They're shitty people.

[-] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 40 points 1 year ago

I saw a guy today with two bumper stickers. One said "Trump" the other said "I love the constitution". I wonder what he would say about this?

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 43 points 1 year ago

Nonsense. He would say nonsense. Because they don't care. They care as much about sounding serious as they do about other people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

I'm sure he'd be very upset if he could read.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They don't really love The Constitution. They only like the first two.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] redlemace@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"don't know" ?? isn't that like the first thing in his job description?

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Yes. In fact, you couldn't be more correct about the matter.

I would describe his response to the question as fully preposterous.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

I would describe it as a dereliction of duty.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If Biden said that the headline would be "Sleepy Dementia Joe Biden Doesn't Remember Oath of Office He Took Three Months Ago". It would be brought up in every segment on every news station for weeks. Trump says it and the news is like "That's kinda weird... Anyways, wonder what Elon is doing..."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN'T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN'T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT'S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

-President Trump, just this year.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 year ago

"to the best of my abilities" is the loophole here

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He doesn't know what the Declaration of Independence is — something that's taught all through grade and middle school in the U.S. The odds are he has no idea what that pesky Constitution says, nor does he care.

[-] takeda@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

The only time when "love and unity" isn't the correct answer he uses it.

[-] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 46 points 1 year ago

This what you get, no-vote cowards.

load more comments (14 replies)

It’s ok, he learned his lesson

-Susan Collins

[-] Zimroxo@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

If this comment doesn't make the case for impeachment idk what does

Upholding the constitution is the most basic part of the job.

If he "doesn't know" if he can do that he is unfit for the position and should be removed immediately. Not even counting all the other violations of the constitution his administration has committed in just the first 100 days alone

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Traitor cunt.

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Oh he literally forgot the oath of the presidency? Sounds like a good reason to invoke the 25th amendment.

[-] ryrybang@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He does not. He's above any and all laws. I don't know why, but he his. The Constitution is meaningless to a king.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago

I’ve got it! Let’s wring our hands about this while we continue to do nothing. Wait until it’s too late, and THEN start to fight back. That’ll show ‘em!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

"I don't know" the defense of criminals and toddlers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

What does it take to get this guy out of office? Genuine question. We impeached this guy like twice but it didn't go through

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

A coffin is the only way. It’ll probably be easier to secede.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I don't know either. I mean he's supposed to, and he swore an oath to, but if nobody is going to enforce that then must he really? What happens if/when he doesn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

At this point I’m just curious how long this will go on. What would have to tilt for a group of politicians to overhaul his ass and the r’s supporting him?

[-] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

I believe it will continue until the politicians are scared of an angry mob kicking in their door.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Trump probably had his fingers crossed while he took the oath.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I always go back to that early coronavirus briefing where a reporter questioned his authority to dictate state government lockdown policies and he just sat there stunned, repeating "when you're the president your authority is total because you have total authority, it's total..." It's been clear for years that this fucking guy never understood the job description, and rather than learning anything from experience, he's having it rewritten. The constitution isn't going to save us from that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Turns out as long as they have ( R ) next to their name, the president can operate with all the integrity of a five year old trying to get out of cleaning their room

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
923 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30930 readers
1859 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS