697

Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly, who edged out New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) for a top Democratic post in December before stepping down, died from esophageal cancer on Wednesday, becoming the third Democrat to die in office this term.

The late congressman made headlines in December when, with support from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, he defeated AOC to lead the House Oversight Committee, despite reportedly violating stock trading laws, according to Raw Story. AOC would have been the youngest Democrat to chair a House committee at 35 years old.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 173 points 1 year ago

Stole the house seat from AOC. Call me Gerry Atric.

DNC death numer three. That's a Gerry Hattrick.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Replaced with someone over 70? You know the party's Democratic

[-] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I would read your book of poetry

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 155 points 1 year ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 70 points 1 year ago

So she'll be replacing him, right?!

Or did Democrats just shit themselves in the for again and that seat will now remain empty like they did with that cryptkeeper lady from California who wasn't even different enough to go to Congress and do her job

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

They will just hand it to the guy he named in his place "temporarily" and refuse to have new committee elections

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago

Stay classy, telling a reporter to “kill yourself” for factually reporting on Connolly publicly announcing his cancer diagnosis.

Why does the party value fealty and seniority so implicitly? There’s a place for the ‘elder statesman’ voice to share institutional wisdom and tribal knowledge, but this man cannot seriously have had more vigor and energy to pour into leadership than someone under half his age…

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

Whats with these old fucks not stepping down and enjoying what little they have left of their lives. Same with biden

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They’re literally unable to do anything else except remain in their protected little cocoons arguing with each other while people fawn over them and pay them for their favor.

They’re like the minor peerage of old. All trying to hang on to their name and title to keep their ego afloat.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

These assholes are so scared of losing power and corporate money they're willing to drop fucking dead on the floor of Congress rather than let the new generation take over.

Fuck these boomer assholes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 year ago

So we'll have someone with fresh ideas on how to stop Trump now, right?

Who will below retirement age, and support major refreshment of polices and politicians, right?

And actually do something this time, instead of thinking out loud and acting like that is the same thing as doing something, right?

...Right?

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, next they'll get someone who's...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Geriatric democrats trying to keep their grip on their right wing agenda.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

thanks pelosi, you lich. i hope they find your phylactery.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

This is literally the epitaph of the Democratic party.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

The Democrats are like ancient kings who killed their children for fear of usurping their rule. Now the enemy is at the gates and they have no generals, the few champions they do have were cowed long ago.

[-] gradual@lemmings.world 17 points 1 year ago

Almost.

Establishment democrats are still living great lives under trump. They're not enemies because trump doesn't fuck with their money, unlike Bernie.

It's the working class that has to suffer.

[-] Neuromorph@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

lead to a vote gap in the Budget bill allowing republicans to pass it. Insane!

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Gotta love how they push for old bastards to die in office to enable Republican goals, instead of helping the progressives who are on their side.

I'm sure its just a coincidence that it happens constantly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

It's insane to think it wouldn't have passed anyway... They would have "found" a dem to flip, they always do.

There will always be a manchin, or a sinema, or a fetterman... Or a Cory fucking Booker who voted to confirm papa kush

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

This is HORRIBLE! There's only So Many OLD WHITE GUYS WITH CANCER we can Appoint to IMPORTANT ROLES before we have LITERALLY NO CHOICE but to Concede LITERALLY EVERY RACE to the Republicans!

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

Schumer, pelosi, Ginsburg, and all the other fossils who refuse to retire until they fucking die are just as responsible as the orange piece of shit is for the current state of amerikkka

[-] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

No, they are not. False equivalence just takes the focus off the people who really are responsible. Trump, his enablers, and his supporters created this disaster.

A lot of useless Democrats failed to stand up and try to stop it. They have much to answer for, but they are in a different category.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

My guy, they are part of the enablers

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was a system of checks and balances, but the Democrats went along with consolidating power. So while yes, they aren't the direct cause, they were the adults in the room and they failed in that responsibility.

[-] VivianRixia@piefed.social 27 points 1 year ago

Ahh, Mr. Guy whose turn it was next.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 29 points 1 year ago

Glad he got to try being useless in an important position before he died.

[-] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

When Alexander the Great died, his empire devolved into infighting and instability. Why would he plan for his successor at such a young age?

These democrats dying in office, leaving no protege nor successor in the wings, are doing the same thing to America but they have no excuse.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 29 points 1 year ago

These ancient centrist fucks are the reason we're in this mess. We don't want their proteges in power. We need new blood that will fight instead of trying to maintain the status quo.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True, look at Pelosi's choice to succeed her, Hakeem Jeffries. I thought he seemed good at first but he's turned out to be just another hand-wringing wimp. So it's not simply a matter of being too old, it's a matter of clinging to the old ways.

edit: IOW, getting younger people in is necessary but not sufficient.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

But guys, it was his turn! Just like Hillary in '16. Forget what the people want, we need to worry about stroking egos here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

JD Vance is on a killing spree

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

This is SO BAD! There's only SO MANY OLD WHITE GUYS WITH CANCER the Democrats can Promote before GIVING UP and Conceding EVERY SINGLE ELECTION to the Republicans!

[-] Psycoder@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
697 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31167 readers
2084 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS