519
She cares more about her career than about all the people that will die as a result of her vote. Edit: Just like all the others who voted for this btw.
Not all of them, plenty of them voted for it because of the people it will harm as a result.
Have you seen the fucks cheering after it passed? Imagine knowing you're fucking over 15+ million people just so you can get a tax break. Disgusting as fuck.
Did you see them laughing while voting down the Democrats’ amendments? Straight up sociopathic.
I’d like to say that Alaska will vote her out but Alaska isn’t known for being progressive or sane. People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps in peace.
Murkowski was literally primaried by a further right nut job, ran in the general as a write in, won and rejoined the Republicans. The only thing that will stop Alaskans electing her is death or retirement.
Well she hasn't had an election since RCV started, so hopefully we get a better Senator
We're at the point that I'm not sure if this is an onion.
*nibble nibble*
Edit several hours later: oh shit this is not an onion. FML.
As a former resident of Alaska I say that, yes that is true.
People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps
Not to mention the enormous, life-changing $1700 per year of oil money everybody gets.
It's usually not that much though. But yeah it is quite the boon every october
Her defiant reaction to the backlash was the worst part of it. She refuses to acknowledge people's ire. She ends up making the case that she did it for Alaskans at the expense of the rest of her country. That she knew it was wrong but didn't mind throwing everyone else under the bus.
Alaska got an exemption from Medicaid Cuts. I imagine her rationale was that she was protecting her constituents. Fucked everyone else though.
All she had to do was say 'no,' and she could have protected her constituents and 330,000,000 other Americans.
The "I got mine. Fuck you" mindset is pretty on brand for Republicans
Yeah but her constituents still have to deal with all the other shit in the bill too so it's not like she really did them any favors.
I guarantee she has a nice cushy lobbyist position lined up for Big Oil after pushing that bill through. She could give two shits about reelection with that fallback.
She’s a piece of shit.
These people shouldn't be elected, they should be studied. In a lab.
Fuck that cunt!
I don't want all this responsibility, I just wanted respect and a nice house. Why are these problems mine to deal with?!
This is the problem with having old people decide on things. Anybody who has a grandmother or grandfather knows how many mistakes they make in a single day.
Remember when republicans would harp on Grover Norquists Taxpayer protection pledge about swearing theyd never raise any taxes? Yeah way back in the old before times, like 2024. You never hear about that anymore.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
519 points (99.8% liked)
politics
30937 readers
2446 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS