this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
155 points (92.8% liked)

News

38895 readers
2421 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

A show called The Starlost.

The Starlost is a Canadian-produced science fiction television series created by writer Harlan Ellison and broadcast in 1973 on CTV in Canada and syndicated to local stations in the United States. The show's setting is a huge generational colony spacecraft called Earthship Ark, which following an unspecified accident has gone off course.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Starlost

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's like reading an article about a petrol refining company, who, having prior experience with gasoline as a useful and profitable substance, decides to seek venture capital for the development of a petrol-based fire-extinguisher. They obtain the funding - presumably because some people with money just wants to see the world burn and / or because being rich and having brains is not necessarily strongly correlated - but after having developed the product, tests conclusively prove the project's early detractors right: The result is surprisingly always more fire, not less. And they "don't know how to fix it, while still adhering to the vision of a petrol-based fire-extinguisher".

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The "fight fire with fire" marketing campaign is getting a lot of engagement so we're releasing the product anyway.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, you could definitely make one. Ensure the petrol is completely aerosolized, so that it burns completely and quickly. Now it just needs to be able to burn oxygen out of a room faster than it can get in. Or it could use the burning petrol to generate coumpounds and co2 to suffocate the fire. Get yourself basically a petrol powered weedeater and replace the rope with some sort of heat dissipater. As it spin its shoots the heat elsewhere, somewhere safer.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those are some interesting and creative suggestions. Now, I'm no weapons engineer, but I believe there's a term for aerosolized gasoline when deployed to put out a fire, and that term is "thermobaric bomb".

Never mind that though, it'll totally work: Not only is a building that no longer exists not a building on fire, but it's guaranteed to never catch fire again. Problem permanently solved. If you're in the market for a job, I've been told that Hellfire ("We may not put you out, but we'll definitely put you down") Inc. is hiring.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

As much as I despise all the hype around AI, it's that hype that's probably leading vulnerable people to these ends

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if it has something to do with this:

"users who turn to popular chatbots when exhibiting signs of severe crises risk"

Blaming the chatbot doesn't seem like the smartest perspective, the title is fucking bullshit.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a lot of questionable things that people in crisis turn to. Intoxicants, religion, c/tenforward, fascism.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's as simple as "correlation does not imply causation".

[–] Steve@communick.news 5 points 1 year ago

The title makes it sound like it's all people.
A better one might be "ChatGPT is failing to help people in crises, and many are dying"

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Papers gotta get clicks. Maybe capitalism is the real villain here.

[–] Kurious84@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 year ago

I still favor a real person when I need tech support.

load more comments
view more: next ›