1568
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 110 points 1 year ago
[-] Dremor@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Would be even funnier with two "Allow" buttons.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago
[-] kurcatovium@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago

One "Allow" and the other one "Nvm, we already know".

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 105 points 1 year ago

Is that pic fucking real!?!?! He actually put his hands around kids that young and looked at them with that face, next to Epstein?

Holy Ravioli

[-] loutr@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 year ago

I'm convinced that Trump is a child rapist, but this picture isn't the smoking gun. They're in a NYC restaurant and the kids are his own, Ivanka and Eric maybe.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago

... Doesn't really eliminate the possibility

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Well that's not how we do things. Evidence first. We don't convict like fascists would.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

I'm being honest here, if I had the opportunity to convict and imprison the Tangerine TurdNugget I'd do it immediately, without a seconds thought. And with zero guilt afterwards.

Hell, on the contrary, I'd feel absolutely elated about what I did every single day of the rest of my life. And I'm not even american.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

he's been very open about how much he'd like to... do things... to Ivanka.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even if they weren't, you can't really glean anything reasonable from a candid photo like that. It's a fool's errand.

Imagine if a photo was taken when a child was walking by someone and tripped, but the guy grabbed the kid's arm and kept them from falling down. Timed right, a photo of that can be easily construed as the person forcefully dragging a child someplace.

It's absurdity. There's plenty that's much more worth everyone's attention, re Donald Trump's crimes, than interpreting candid photos.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 76 points 1 year ago

He had multiple rape cases filed against him and the one that i remember specifically was suddenly dropped right before the 2016 election.

[-] shplane@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

She dropped the case because of all the death threats she was getting from his cult

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

DOJ: These two things are completely unrelated.

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 year ago

Leave my cousin out of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] booly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago

One of them is Ivanka and the other is one of his other male children

[-] brown_guy45@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Well I'm not a trump supporter

But putting hands on a kid's neck isn't supposed to be sexual

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 year ago

It's not just the government. There is a long list of billionaires in those documents. It would be a genuine eat the rich moment, and chunks of MAGA would help. It would collapse the whole system.

And yes, it needs to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Allemaniac@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

love the bite dems seem to develop now. Solidarity from Europe, One Love <3

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately, most dems aren't biting like this. And Mamdani hasn't even won his general election yet (he's only won the Democratic primary so far).

Most elected dems are just biting the curb.

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

They're biting the pillow, it's the American public being forced to bite the curb.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This isnt by the Mamdani that's running for mayor. It's a random using that name.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Mamdani is running for mayor of NYC, but governor Mamdani would be nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Man, get yer pesky truth out o 'ere. It's 2025! And this is a screencap of a blue checkmark!

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Old guard Dems don't want to release it. Only people likebm Bernie, AOC and madamni want to release it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 year ago

Look at this SOCIALIST who's calling for the COLLAPSE of the US GOVERNMENT just because some PEDOPHILES run literally EVERYTHING! He HATES AMERICA!

-Pizzagate believers!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Seefoo@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Based if that is really from zohran. Also very true

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 40 points 1 year ago

It is from a Zohran Mamdani, but not the NY State Assemblyman Zohran Kwame Mamdani (who is @zohrankmamdani on Twitter)

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

yeah we wouldn't have to go this deep if the checkmark didn't lose its fucking meaning thanks to the troglodyte in charge

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago

To be fair, the entire platform lost its meaning when Nazi Musk bought it.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I feel like there's an easy solution. Fill the twitter servers rooms with lye and tell Musk it's coke so he snorts it.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

It lost it's meaning before that.

It started as "we have confirmed you are who you say you are, public figure", and that was it.

The some Twitter features were pegged to it.

Then it spread.

Then it also somehow became a "Twitter approves of this message" flag, as some people were stripped of their check for posting offensive things (probably most notoriously Milo).

Then Twitter staff started expediting the process in exchange for essentially bribes.

Then Elon buys Twitter.

Then it just became a subscription service, with enhanced features over non-check users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

lol trump wanted to deport him before... props, dude knows how to punch up.

How long till ICE sees this

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sooner when more and more people share it.

[-] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Honestly, my fear is that if it does get released, the government will try and normalize it and the public going along with it. I fear for all the daughters and women out there.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

And yet a maniac took an AR-15 to a pizza place in DC because "the Democrats" were running a sex trafficking ring out of the basement.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Some depictions of marriage in the Bible include married men having teenage sex slaves right?

[-] Forester@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not exactly. Note most of what the Bible says on marriage is Jewish law. The marriage is normally set up by the father of the daughter. The wife legally can not initiate a divorce without consent but the wife can petition a council of rabi to physicall beat the husband till he agrees to the divorce so....

1 Corinthians‬ ‭7:37‬ ‭ESV‬‬ [37] But whoever is firmly established in his heart, being under no necessity but having his desire under control, and has determined this in his heart, to keep her as his betrothed, he will do well. [36] But if any man thinks he is behaving improperly toward his virgin, if she is past the flower of youth, and thus it must be, let him do what he wishes. He does not sin; let them marry.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Too bad there's noone left to prosecute him...

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

More like train the swamp

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
1568 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

10401 readers
109 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. You can replace the addres of .x.com to xcancel.com in the address. https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS