this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

17209 readers
2291 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/mNVfc

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sasquatch@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

return to work.

Misleading right from the start

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, everyone is the Fortune 101+ is raking in the talent by allowing remote work. Every job I’ve seen that is remote has had 400+ applicants on LI whereas on-site is lucky to get 20-30.

Companies offering remote are swimming in talent options.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Better talent that's cheaper too.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago

The workers should ensure they don’t remain on the fortune 100 list. :3c

[–] doublebatterypack@piefed.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

this comment will be deleted soon

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the other CEOs who don't understand how people can work remotely are doing it and they want to fit in by forcing their employees to do the same.

Proof that remote work makes for better and more effective employees means nothing, they just want control. Same reason they force people to follow specific office hours and mandate overtime that just drags out work that could be done in four days if they have flexible schedules.

[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 10 points 1 year ago

City governments have been pushing hard because they're worried about their tax base and economies - not so much for the office space itself (though that's in danger), but the ancillary businesses like coffee shops, lunch places, and car parks. It's a shitty reason, as they could take the opportunity to rearchitect office space into livable housing and solve the problem that way - but they don't want to.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 year ago

Stealth layoffs

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago

Inc. article from July 10, 2025. [New Data Shows Workers Are Mostly Ignoring Return-to-Office Orders](https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/new-data-shows-workers-are-mostly-ignoring-return-to-office-orders/91202144)