this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
147 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“One thing we have really found is a place to feel comfortable being ourselves,” Dean said. Americans are segregating by their politics at a rapid clip, helping fuel the greatest divide between the states in modern history.

One party controls the entire legislature in all but two states. In 28 states, the party in control has a supermajority in at least one legislative chamber — which means the majority party has so many lawmakers that they can override a governor’s veto. Not that that would be necessary in most cases, as only 10 states have governors of different parties than the one that controls the legislature

This can only end badly as conservatives seem to have no problem ruling over land in empty states.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree it's not great, but red states are actively persecuting minorities. Why would a minority willingly stay in a red state at this point? And if you're an ally or liberal or whatever and see what's happening clearly, why would you stay and be a part of it?

Polarization is the logical outcome of Republican policies.

[–] sim_@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s an interesting dilemma. As one example, I feel a tinge of regret that two blue votes are leaving Texas when my partner and I leave. On the other, which of us are obligated to stay and sacrifice personal security or comfort for an uncertain political “battle”?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] millie@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly? We should cut them off.

All these red states rely on blue states for their money. They literally couldn't afford to have roads and schools if it wasn't for federal funding paid for by states with healthier economies and more liberal policies (no coincidence).

So let's take their fucking money. They want to drive the country into the dirt? Let them pay their own way and we'll sit in our relatively progressive bubbles until they realize they do, in fact, need us.

[–] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% agreed, not sure why we're subsidizing an entire third world country stapled to America that wants to drag us back to the dark ages and use our own money to do so.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've contacted my state level Democratic party representatives! You should too! If enough people bring the idea forward, maybe they'll use it!

[–] Arayvenn@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seeing the real harm caused by recent legislation in states like Florida, I'm not convinced this effect isn't mostly women and POC actively fleeing red states.

[–] agoramachina@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm fleeing Florida with my partner because we're not safe here anymore. I'm riding out the lease here while she finds a place out of state where she can get her hormones and we won't get hate crimed. ffs, I'd been to Pulse the week before the shooting and the sociopolitical climate has only gotten worse with the current legislation.

[–] Bowen@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're trying to get my s/o and her kid out of Florida but her ex husband is kind of a shitbag and purposefully avoiding family court to keep her locked there. It's straight up awful. We're already on a like 10 month wait for this process.

There's also a really good chance she gets locked there for custody for the next decade. Which sucks because she absolutely needs medical care for her bits and bobs and Florida is actively fighting her on it because they're close to abortions in their nature. Several doctors giving her the run around for endo treatment and such.

[–] agoramachina@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

All the best to both of you, it's a shit situation all around. I was incredibly fortunate to be able to find a doctor willing to give me a hysterectomy; she says the number of those surgeries have skyrocketed (bisalps/tubals too) because none of us are sure just how much worse this is going to get.

[–] agoramachina@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had to escape Florida for the safety of my partner and myself. She couldn't even get her hormones anymore.

[–] pkulak@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it’s wrong to frame it is a “can’t we all get along thing”. People are moving for health, safety and general well-being.

[–] lvl13charlatan@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm planning on moving my family out of Texas. It's not safe to be a woman here and I can't put my kids through public education that is being systematically dismantled by underfunding, book bans, and restrictive curriculum.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] brianshatchet@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

The new kind of lead poisoning

[–] ArtZuron@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

And red states are also the ones suppressing blue votes as well. That's the only reason GOP win any presidential elections, or probably federal elections in general.

[–] DiachronicShear@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conservatives want to eradicate anyone that isn't Straight, White, and Christian, so why would I ever move to a red state if I'm not in that group?

[–] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Right? I just want to live around people I’m not certain would shoot me if there were no consequences.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

You mean land that is cheap because, by definition, people don’t want to live there? Blue areas aren’t expensive because of failed policies, they’re expensive because successful policies (in the context of liberal capitalism) make them highly coveted locations, and housing markets follow that supply and demand thing of which capitalists are so fond.

[–] azureeight@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Built with zero regulations so it falls apart in two years.

[–] RobOplawar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This offhand comment that was quoted in the article is really unsettling:

“Here, the tax dollars naturally goes to the citizens, not the immigrants,”

This isn't a conservative vs liberal policy thing, this is more insidious. This person's worldview subconsciously classes "citizens" and "immigrants" as mutually exclusive groups. There's "us, who were here before and belong here", and "them, who came here from somewhere else and shouldn't receive the benefits of our government". It seems like it wasn't long ago that the dominant left-vs-right conversations I observed were mostly discussions about economic and foreign policy where both sides had reasonable points and compromise was possible, but this isn't that. This ideological divide built on religion, xenophobia, nationalism, etc. can't end well.

[–] Senuf@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It won't. Sometimes it feels like some people have been reading certain dystopian science fiction and alternate history novels and stories as if they were a blueprint instead of a warning.

[–] RobOplawar@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

"Us vs. Them" has been standard-issue fascism for a long time.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've said it before and I'll say it again, the US will break up like the USSR in my lifetime.

It's going to be messy, and there's going to be some serious consequences for certain states that wanted to control their own laws based on Church/Hate despite being completely unable to go it alone economically.

[–] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It’s gonna be that or fascism for everyone, so I’ll take the messy breakup.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] EthicalAI@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (14 children)

The problem is that the real divide still is urban vs rural, not state v state. I always lived in red states and am very leftist. There's always strong leftist communities in every red state, even in small cities. Every state is less than 10% off from true purple last I checked.

[–] PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

People know that. But power isn’t divided that way. So when people look to alternatives to federal power, they usually look to the existing political infrastructure of states, not, for instance, less-organized/-powerful counties.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is a real shitty time to be a gun loving transgender anarchist...feels like there is nowhere for me to go.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like I will be forced to move out of my state if they manage to pass the proposed anti-transgender laws. 😔

[–] StringTheory@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Move if you must to protect your safety and life. You are a precious valued member of society, and don’t let anyone tell you different.

Thanks. Luckily I work in Massachusetts, which will hopefully continue to be a trans friendly state. So, i am planning to move there when i can.

[–] cecirdr@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm a blue person, stuck in the southeast. I'm nearly 59 years old, so I can't transplant easily. My spouse has family roots and a house here too. (I don't, I've been more mobile before I met her).

She's not likely to sell her house either (despite being liberal) because she bought the home she grew up in; Nostalgia. I'm hoping that in 8 years when I retire, she and I will be more on the same sheet of music. Maybe she'll be ready to downsize (though she still harbors the idea of keeping the house, renting it, and being able to will it to her daughter), and we can consider leaving.

The only game plan I can come up with is get a nice van as our "second home" and live full time on the road; Quite an expensive way to escape. Sigh...I hope she and I sync up eventually.

[–] middlemuddle@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I live in a blue state I love and my immediate family lives in a red state. I've seriously considered moving to be closer to them even though it would be a bit of a downgrade, geographically. However, I'm not going to move somewhere that my wife won't be able to make her own decisions about medical care. We're not sure whether we're going to have kids yet, but there is no way we'd do it in that red state. And even if we decide not to go the kid route, things don't always happen as predicted and I want her to be able to get all necessary medical care without having to drive to a different state.

I'd be okay with being blue in a sea of red, but not at the expense of my family's health and safety.

[–] DEXSIC@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article mentions the types of people who left these states, but I am more interested in the economic activity in the years to come with all this movement. This is a classic example of people voting with their feet. Reagan spoke of this stuff back in the 80s.

[...] this is one of the—the built-in guarantee of freedom is our federalism that makes us so unique, and that is the right of the citizen to vote with his feet. If a State is badly managed, the people will either do one of two things: They will either use their power at the polls to redress that, or they'll go someplace else. And we've seen industries driven out of some States by adverse tax policies and so forth. - Ronald Reagan, November 19, 1981

We have yet to see how all this movement will impact the individual states themselves or the country as a whole yet. For example, we do not know how all this will all play out economically for the red/blue states. COVID mixed with Remote Work has upended a lot of the soft lines that kept people within a state to begin with (for many, but not all). Truly wild times we are in.

[–] off_brand_@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Actually, West Virginia might well be an example. They have been facing brain drain for a generation (if not more), and it's affected the economy to such a degree that WV will regularly offer raw cash to people moving in. Nevermind that they won't spend that money on their own services...

I'm not educated enough to speak to causes. Anecdotally, though, everyone I know from college left or is trying to leave because it's dangerous to be there if you're queer. That sort of privilege only comes with money, though, so if that anecdote means anything than their highest earning queers and allies are fleeing the state.

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

So uh... What do we do? The best ideas we've seen basically boil down to gambling on being able to make small parts of symptoms of the root problems slightly better in local areas... ~Strawberry

load more comments
view more: next ›