this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
554 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

12007 readers
1563 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

article

toot

easily contact your MEP: https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 114 points 11 months ago (4 children)

This is the worst thing in ages. I'm 50+, very good with IT, and I understand that we MUST act against it.

But I'm tired, boss.

Surrounded by lemmings and sheep that love Facebook and WhatsApp. People are stupid. I don't have the energy to fight so much ignorance and stupidity - willful or otherwise.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 57 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also, they keep trying. You fight it one year, they're back the next. Extremely undemocratic.

[–] brachypelmide@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Precisely. You need to keep winning, while they just need to win once. Would love it if repeat offenders like these would just stop being considered entirely after being rejected multiple times.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago

The provided link will let you contact MPs with just a few lazy clicks.

[–] rekabis@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Just a few years older, in IT as a career, and absolutely the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh shit - I thought they dropped this! JFC, EU! What TF are you doing?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There seems to be some kind of group repeatedly pushing this crap every other year, with increasingly shady tactics.

I would for sure like to know from where this emanates...

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's the pro-surveilance people that want to monetize your data. They try and lean on fear and push this "only ISIS uses Signal" narrative that is obviously false.

It's just so preposterous - businesses and payment processors rely on e2ee just as much as anyone else does. The one time we're on the same team they just want a carve out for businesses or something I expect.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So that's why their quiz is stacked this weird way:

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, classic juked survey. Not objective at all, only someone that is "pro-crime!" would say no.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ISIS also breathes oxygen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I swear that fuckface is part Ellen Degeneres

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not enough people are aware of just how evil Peter Theil really is

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Agreed. I’ve tried to tell people about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment but friends and family brush it off like it’s some small cult thing instead of being silently funded by billionaires

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 33 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This would not break encrypted messaging but forbid it.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if I just transmit a bunch of random ass digits to someone?

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 12 points 11 months ago (4 children)

And, now listen, what if the someone has a bunch of these numbers in his backpocket, and by complete chance, when added to your number, it gives a number that might just mean something.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Any Dutch people here? Follow nerdvote.nl, to help decide who to vote for this election. They are suggesting technical minded people should unite and form a block in elections, so that parties will try to cater to us. If you want our vote, come up with plans an proposals to create digital sovereignty and freedom. As a member of PVDA/GL I am probably voting Barbara Kathmann , as she is fighting for digital sovereignty. Without preferential votes she probably won't make it in so your preferential vote matters!

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Ok how do they plan to enforce that?

By banning HTTPS at the ISP level?

Edit: and then how do they enforce GPDR? Because you better believe everyone and their mother is going to snoop on every communication made.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Blocking HTTPS would be frighteningly hilarious. My employer is one of thousands of websites that utilizes HSTS, which tells web browsers to use HTTPS. Our implementation of HSTS, like lots of banks etc. is also listed with HSTSpreload, which means browsers like chrome will only ever use HTTPS with our site.

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What if they just do MITM with a Trusted root? Does HSTS provide a method to do cert pinning?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

By forcing Whatsapp Signal etc to implement backdoors

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

Signal wouldn't, or if it did, it would be labeled as such as an insecure fork for EU conpliance only and make that fork stale immediately.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Don't need to ban encryption, just control top level certificate authorities and have access to private keys.

I'd like to see them try to get mine lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago

Operation Rubicon!

This is such a bad idea that even the US stopped doing it to all their enemies (i.e. their allies). Of course they have PRISM instead now which can't be cracked by their enemies (i.e. their enemies and allies).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Rubicon

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

One point of hope is that they mandated cross platform chat compatibility too, and every platform is just... Ignoring it and not doing it with zero consequences.

Maybe this just also won't happen.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

Feeling hopeful about giant tech companies ignoring attempts to reign them in is unwise, even when it occasionally lines up with something you personally want. And I even say that as someone with permanent distrust of the big power structures doing the regulating.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Of course chat control would be practically infeasible. But it's not even about that. It's about the simple fact that the EU commission ignores the will of the people, when the people have already clearly said NO. It's about the disrespect that the EU commission exerts against the people. That in itself is unacceptable.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Don't get your hopes up. The police and secret services don't care about cross platform compatibility, but they're chomping at the bit for mass surveillance.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm just so tired of it all. At this point I would not be surprised about ending up in prison a decade from now for using encrypted communication.

[–] Broken_Orange_Juice@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Aren't Europeans supposed to be the good guys?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are no "good guys" or "bad guys" in geopolitics, just shades of grey. On quite a few topics, the EU is better, but any government is capable of doing stupid shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No, the EU is just as much liberal capitalism as the US. They have a better social safety net and looked better in comparison.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 9 points 11 months ago

The competition is pretty weak.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 months ago

The EU's been veering right for a few years now.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago

the EU commission is absolutely dumb and definitely not on the side of the people though. by the way, it's also not democratically elected.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 7 points 11 months ago

Thanks for sharing the link to contact the MEPs. Thats actually very useful.

[–] AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's ironic to use a meme from a movie depicting a fascistic government, to protest against a fascistic measure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mr_satan@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago (5 children)

In many cases this could be argued as unconstitutional.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

In germany, it's not technically unconstitutional (i checked last week because i assumed it should be) but it definitely feels like it should be unconstitutional. After WW2, there was a consensus to not surveil your own population, and this is a very important constraint to keep in mind.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Where did you check that? The Vorratsdatenspeicherung has been ruled unconstitutional twice for example

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I've contacted them yesterday evening. Funnily enough, all the AfD opposes chat control. They're clever. If chat control were to pass, they could campaign on having opposed it, and then mission creep it once elected.

load more comments
view more: next ›