370
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 110 points 1 year ago

A proposed bill in Michigan has a broad reach that covers everything from adult AI content to manga and even depictions of transgender people. It includes a VPN ban to avoid workarounds.

On Sept. 11, Michigan Republican representatives proposed far-reaching legislation banning adult internet content.

The bill, called the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act and advanced by six Republican representatives, would ban a wide variety of adult content online, ranging from ASMR and adult manga to AI content and any depiction of transgender people. It also seeks to ban all use of VPNs, foreign or US-produced.

The Anticorruption of Public Morals Act has not passed the Michigan House of Representatives committee nor been voted on by the Michigan Senate, and it's not clear how much support the bill currently has beyond the six Republican representatives who have proposed it.

TL;DR: 6 Republicans in Michigan proposed a bill that won't pass, as the Senate and Governor are Democrats.

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 82 points 1 year ago

Any law that contains the word "morals" or "morality" in the title terrifies me. They 100% of the time are a net negative for society.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Especially when morals vary and are just someone's opinion. Morals should only be involved when it's based on the most popular opinion. Moral laws should 100% be voted on by the people not just some old people that are out of touch with society.

[-] balrog@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

Even if the entire state government were Republican, it wouldn't pass. This bill is basically the definition of governmental virtue signaling

Businesses require VPNs to function. Banning them would decimate Michigan's economy. The only thing these people truly value is money

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 13 points 1 year ago

Whether or not its realistic or functional has no real impact on a bill passing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

Porn for me but not for thee.

Ironic that the party of fucking pedophiles wants to block pornography because it’s indecent. But raping little children is OK by them so long as you’re sufficiently rich and well-connected enough to avoid any consequences.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

How do they plan to ban VPNs? Not on the legal side - they’ll just say they’re banned.

But in the real world, I can disguise my packets to not look like VPN packets, and I can also use many different types of obfuscation to ensure my activity stays private.

So my question is: where are the epstein files?

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

They don't, because every business uses one.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Michigan's bill would charge internet service providers with detecting and blocking VPN use, as well as banning the sale of VPNs in the state.

Sounds like they are basically planning to tell ISPs to just figure it out, and suing VPN companies that don't block people from their state.

[-] Colloidal@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Had me in the first half, NGL.

[-] RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's one hell of a misleading headline. It should read ”Michigan Republicans Introduced a Bill...”

[-] lukaro@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

If it's something shitty that the government is doing you can be assured, it's a republican.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Epzillon@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Literal China surveillance state bill. How the fuck do I keep reading shit like this every day. What even is the US?

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Reading the bill, it's pretty insane. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to ban pretty much all sexual content and all depictions of cross dressing, along with proxies and VPNs. I'm pretty sure you couldn't show Monty Python, because they occasionally cross dress in their sketches.

Anticorruption of Public Morals Act. The name alone screams overreach.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 year ago

Wait until they find out that HTTPS traffic is encrypted

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Don't be naive and think they can't block this stuff because of encryption. They just go after the business entities. Eventually you'll only be left with super sketchy options that they'll try to block by IP.

They probably won't totally succeed, but they can make things far shitter than they are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

A middlebox can't see the actual content but they know what sites you are visiting and how often if you are only using HTTPS - meaning they can also block you from accessing sites of their choosing

[-] towerful@programming.dev 21 points 1 year ago

Huh.
So the UK has previously failed to block encryption. And somehow the Online Safety Act got pushed through to PrOtEcT ThE ChiLDrEn - requiring age verification for all adult content.
Resulting in a study by ministers on how VPNs stop OfCom from enforcing the OSA.
Which is a thing VPNs do. So it's very likely VPNs get de-anonymised, regulated or outlawed.

Seems like there is a war on the actual internet, owning device and services.

Why don't they licence IP addresses? Require a change to IPv6 and just assign everyone a IPv6/48 block at birth. That means there are 281 billion birth assignments available, with everyone getting septillions of personal addresses - actually more than you could provision in a vibe coded k8s manifest.

If there are 200 million births per year (it's apparently 135 million atm), thats well over 1000 years before we run out of IPv6/48 blocks (1400 years, to be slightly more accurate. At a constant 135m births per year, thats 2000 years. But conservatively, 1000 years before we reuse IPv6/48 blocks... If we don't reduce the block size to represent year born or something)

Fuck.
The good internet is gone. The convenient internet is fading fast.

[-] Sylos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you'll own nothing and be Happy

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Heh, I allocated a ipv6 cidr to a dev to use for ha testing. He created 1 /48 subnet then came back and asked for another 3. Sigh.

[-] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

sadly for them i2p and tor exist so not sure who this bill will be keeping safe

[-] TaviRider@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

[The bill] includes language that could ban not only VPNs but any method of bypassing internet filters or restrictions.

It sounds to me like I2P and tor would also be illegal.

[-] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

not illegal if you dont get caught vpns are very easy to detect

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

It’s some sort of weirdo purity thing not a safety thing.

[-] jedibob5@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

So... how do they plan to sell this idea to companies that require their employees to sign into their corporate VPNs when they're on the job?

[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 5 points 1 year ago

Forced to work in their ~~private equity~~ buildings, like they’ve been doing forever?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This won't survive lobbying by corporations who need VPN to work.

[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You can say that about alot of stupid trump laws, they just keep getting passed.

[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I sure as hell hope you're right.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Business is the number one user of vpn and the reason it was created.

[-] cyborganism@piefed.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Isn't this similar to what the Brits are implementing?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

BREAKING NEWS: It's time to jump ship

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago

Friendship with VPN has ended.

New best friend is Proxy Server.

[-] arcayne@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

Can't catch me, FBI-man. I'm behind 7 proxies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 8 points 1 year ago

But don't you dare tell an American to rise up against this. They are so busy campaigning the next election, they don't have the time and finance to insurrect.

So enjoy your Syrian internet.

[-] feddylemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is for Michigan and it will not pass. No wonder I have you tagged as a knee jerk flame fueler.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Runaway@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

So how to evade a VPN ban?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'd love to see how the banning of VPNs interferes with businesses lmao. I work for an MSP and like all of our clients have VPNs for business critical stuff.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
370 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

5337 readers
471 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS