54
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy to c/privacy@programming.dev
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Highly doubtful about their "reluctance"....

[-] ahornsirup@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago

No reason to be. All that age verification requirements do is create extra cost for them. They've got the data already (or at least a close enough estimate) just not in a way that satisfies this idiotic law.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Of course they're reluctant. All these laws do are add costs and hassle. The additional lawyer fees alone must be astronomical.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah but theses regulatory burdens can only be born by mega-corporations so even though it is extra work for them, it still benefits them.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

They were both at the inauguration, shoulder to shoulder at the coronation.

They signed on the dotted.

this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

5091 readers
69 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS