156
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 10 months ago

I'm somewhat excited but I'm still going to hold some back until they reveal who this mystery OEM is. I really don't want to move from one big corporation to another

[-] refalo@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago

What non-big corporation makes mobile phones?

[-] xav@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago

I would go with Fairphone in a heartbeat

[-] unrealMinotaur@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

They have indicated it will not be Fairphone

[-] xav@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

Yess I know. I was just saying it's not just big corps making worthy phones.

[-] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

That's kind of my point. I get that making phones is complicated, but it'd be nice to have better hardware options, too.

[-] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

HTC! Don't call it a comeback

[-] vatlark@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It always seemed odd to me that you needed a pixel. I know it's for reasons but google is an anti-privacy company at it's core.

If they can break away from Google I will buy one next.

[-] chasteinsect@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Depends who they go with. I for one would not be a fan of buying a Chinese phone but it will probably be Chinese.

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 10 months ago

You mean Taiwanese, right?

Chinese components, American components. All made in Taiwan!

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 10 months ago

Well Qualcomm chips are made in Taiwan. Most of the phones are actually made in China or India (PCBs and assembly) I believe.

[-] uncrme@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean does it really matter if they offer all the hardware security features and it's running with GrapheneOS, which is FOSS

There's nothing inherently less secure about a device just because it's Chinese lol

[-] chasteinsect@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

From a privacy / security POV you're probably right but I just don't want to support Chinese companies right now, at least where possible.

[-] Tundra@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago

please make the battery/hardware repairable

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 16 points 10 months ago

That would be nice but I do wonder how much the Graphene project is going to be involved in hardware decisions if it is a major OEM. Sounds like it'll be more just a phone where the OEM provides support of bootloader unlocks and installation of graphene

[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

batteries and hardware (motherboards, cameras, etc) on most phones and laptops are achievably replaceable. not "I'm boarding a plane better change it in my lap" but like half an hour of work, which isn't that big of a drag every year or so. watch any youtube video tutorial to get a better sense. I'm not saying grams can pull it off, but if you're even tangentially tech literate, it's doable.

[-] noodlejetski@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago

yeah, just make sure you've got a heat gun, a suction cup, a pry tool, and three different kinds of screwdrivers.

[-] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Little kit from ifixit has this minus the heatgun for 12$ or something. Advertised as an add-on for many orders.

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago

Too bad google stopped shipping pixel specific code in the AOSP tree. Maybe they wouldn't be contemplating dropping the pixel 11 if that was still the case.

[-] noodlejetski@piefed.social 3 points 10 months ago

I'm sure Google is very upset about it

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 6 points 10 months ago

My brainhole keeps saying it's Sony.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 3 points 10 months ago
[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Everyone is posting this too much and I feel you are "jinxing it"

[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

whoever they end up with, it's gonna be a new model, which means perfectly usable tech from the last 7-8 years is excluded, and it also means it's gonna be expensive. so good for them, I guess, but this news doesn't concern me in the slightest.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 10 months ago

In a year or two it will not be new anymore and if the same model will be available with stock android it doesn't have to be very expensive.

[-] glitching@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

my baseline is a 7 year old model with 8 GB RAM and SDM845 that I can get intermittently for $50. for that kinda money I get a LineageOS fully supported device that's blazing fast, safe and secure against any reasonable threat; I have zero concerns a lost or stolen device will compromise me. as a bonus, it just so happens it's one of the best supported devices for Mobian and postmarketOS. so, that's the baseline.

GrapheneOS value proposition is gonna be spend 10x that (at least!) for a marginally secure-er solution. that's a shite deal.

now if they partnered with LineageOS and other "let's revive old shit left behind" that would be a different story. imagine if Linux was available only on latest gen CPUs, would all of us be into it? I know I wouldn't be.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 10 months ago

By "secure against any reasonable threat" you mean device that no longer receives firmware updates?

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

you seem to have completely ignored the "reasonable" part

[-] cyborganism@piefed.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I can't wait!

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
156 points (98.8% liked)

Privacy

5085 readers
276 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS