505
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday accused the Trump administration of “rigging the election” by dispatching federal poll monitors to five California counties, as voters cast ballots on Newsom’s Proposition 50 redistricting measure.

The Department of Justice announced Friday that it would deploy personnel to polling sites in Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside counties to “ensure transparency, ballot security, and compliance with federal law,” ahead of the state’s Nov. 4 special election.

In an interview with KQED’s Political Breakdown, Newsom said the move was a “setup” for the Trump administration to cast doubt on the potential victory of Proposition 50 — a plan to redraw the state’s congressional district lines to advantage Democrats.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 124 points 10 months ago

This country isnt making it to the next presidential election without mass turmoil and unrest. It will be an entirely different place again by then.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago

2026 is going to be madness. And if Democrats don’t take the house, 2028 will be the end.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

I’m pretty sure we’ve crossed that rubicon, the last election was just that. Cross your fingers if you must, but I don’t believe for one second that votes matter anymore in the “united” states.

[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

Stop relying on elections to save you. You can't vote your way out of fascism. The only way out is through mass civil unrest. Strikes, blackouts, protests.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

But that point of contention is too important. Dems need to take the house in order to build the narrative that precedes the unrest. It's going to be a lot harder to send that message if they appear too unpopular to do that.

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

That's why they need to control the media narratives.
And why they want to make negative opinions of the regime illegal.
Once they've made it illegal and can control the media they now have created an environment of fear where no one even trusts their neighbor.
The knock on effect is that it is now harder to organize resistance because even expressing dissent has been outlawed.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

We are commenting on a thread about the current president openly interfering in state elections. It can be assumed the elections will be compromised.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 74 points 10 months ago

That and many other moves that can be interpreted as “preparing” for upcoming elections, like deploying troops, buying voting machine manufacturers, …

It is very clear where all this is going. Don’t wait for elections to make your voice heard.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

I thought states are in control of elections?

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 40 points 10 months ago

States are. Trump's "monitors" have no authority to go anywhere where the state tells them not to go. They have no authority to "review" or change anything.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

But many of those states are run by Republicans who have every incentive to cheat

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

That's something internal to the state, that the state will have to deal with, like "CyberNinjas." What Trump wants is to directly interfere with election results, using Feds. The law is really clear that the states run their own elections.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I agree. What I'm saying is that Republican run states will allow his fuckery to enable chrating.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Lol "will". GOP fuckery is the only reason Republicans have held power for the last 30 years.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The law is really clear on a lot of things that haven't stopped or slowed the regime.

[-] iamacar@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

And we all know Trump and maga are really into following laws and being fair.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

They can make up bogus "fraud" claims, then take it to the supreme court, and have them rubber-stamp a republican victory.

California will refuse the court order... and voila... a constitutional crisis.

trump will send in the army and declare martial law, and order the assassination of newsom. Civil war...

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Election workers gonna have these jag offs breathing down their necks

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 6 points 10 months ago

I’m liking this guy more and more.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

The same guy who had Charlie Kirk on his podcast a little while ago to kiss his ass? Hell no. He’s better than Trump, but a wet pile of dog shit is better than Trump.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

He’s a corrupt shitbag. We pay the highest residential energy rates in the entire world here because the regulator is totally captured. Oh, and guess who is a major shareholder of the utility company? What a coincidence.

[-] HuskerNation@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 10 months ago

Can't he kick them out like Florida and Texas did?

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Well, they can't have free elections after shitting on all subjects. Imagine a working democratic house and senate actually taking care of Trump...

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Wait, that's illegal

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
505 points (98.7% liked)

politics

30941 readers
3172 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS