576
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

President backs Cuomo in election eve Truth Social post as Mamdani hits back at Trump’s ‘threat – it is not the law’

On the eve of New York’s well-watched mayoral election, Donald Trump issued a threat to its voters: stop Zohran Mamdani or pay.

“If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad.”

Trump’s comments echo those broadcast on Sunday during his appearance on CBS’s 60 minutes, in which he said: “It’s gonna be hard for me as the president to give a lot of money to New York, because if you have a communist running New York, all you’re doing is wasting the money you’re sending there.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 122 points 9 months ago

I'd love to see NYC set up a voluntary escrow account for federal taxes.

You don't have to pay shit till taxes are due, have NYC sit on their withholdings and trump won't be able to build any ballrooms.

[-] ElectricWaterfall@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 months ago

The problem is employers take taxes directly out of paychecks and send directly to the federal government.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 months ago

Pretty sure they don't have to, you can opt out and pay the full bill come tax day. That would certainly put sand in the gears.

[-] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 10 points 9 months ago

You have to pay quarterly if your withholding doesn't match you tax burdon. That's oversimplified but in general you cannot wait till tax day or else everyone would. You would just self withhold, leave the cash in a safe money market fund and make 4% on it till tax day.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 11 points 9 months ago

Who cares? Do it anyway. The law doesn't fucking matter any more.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

It does for us plebs.

An in-group that the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group that the law binds but does not protect.

[-] acchariya@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Illegal if a few thousand people do it, but defacto legal if a few million people do it.

We need a 2025 word for illegal things getting a pass due to systemic chaos in the same way we had truthyness in the early 2000s. I propose "derelegal" to mean technically illegal but unenforced due to systemic chaos or legal rot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 104 points 9 months ago

Good thing it is legal for Trump and only Trump to meddle in elections. Yay.

[-] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 9 months ago

This seems the require a better descriptor. Extorting an election.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 97 points 9 months ago

Other states should protest by withholding taxes, as well. United, yes?

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's not really how it works - there's no one big sack of cash that gets handed over by the state, individual businesses (and people) pay their taxes to the IRS directly, and then separately to the state tax agencies (obvs leaving out some of the draconian nuance here). States don't have a practical method of withholding taxes short of going to every business and demanding they stop paying the feds. While hypothetically possible at some point, it's not in the short term feasible.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I disagree. I think having everyone send their federal taxes to a state entity for leverage purposes would be an interesting development. The individual is protected, and the state holds the bag.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 12 points 9 months ago

Tbh one of my main takeaways from this presidency is that states send too much money to the federal gov and have to ask for it back. It feels like having more local control of how these dollars are spent would maybe even be bi partisan.

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

It is not bipartisan. The countries that take more than they send (primarily Republican states, I'm led to believe) would absolutely refuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago

How the fuck...

When the ever loving fuck are people going to wake up and remember their government/civics lessons??

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 27 points 9 months ago

Those teach how things are supposed to work, not what to do when things don't work as they should. I'm willing to wager no government willingly teaches people how to coerce it into working for them, but at least America definitely doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lilmookieesquire@lemmy.today 41 points 9 months ago

I really can’t think of higher praise.

[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 9 months ago

I may be wrong, but isn't NYC more of a money generator than it's a receiver? If that's so, I don't see how NYC would suffer, but it would widen the divide between such areas and poor dotational ones, making their people possible maga recruits.

[-] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 9 months ago

Most blue areas produce money, most red areas (excluding Texas I think) are leeches.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

i think people are still expected to pay federal taxes. even if trump blocked funds.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

Like King George did? How did that work out?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Hilarious watching these idiots call literally everything they don't like "communism".

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Communist, socialist, anarchist, antifa, woke, leftist. Which ones am I missing that ain’t slurs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 34 points 9 months ago

lol NY doesn’t need “his” funds. Trump needs NY funds though.

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

The billionaires don’t want you to know this but you pay taxes to the states your business is located in. You don’t just “leave” because taxes. The businesses these billionaires own in New York are still subject to taxes.

What’s crazy is the right has “donated” more money to supporting cuomo than Mamdani would have even taxed them.

[-] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Businesses already set up headquarters in Delaware for tax reasons. They're not going to leave New York City, one of biggest markets on Earth. This argument from conservatives was always stupid.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 29 points 9 months ago

At this point there's little reason for blue states to remain. The US federal government is too far gone to fix and the kinds of ass wipe Democrats who would get elected certainly are going to do anything like expanding the Supreme Court or her tailing the power of the president so we might as well start from scratch

[-] rockettaco37@feddit.nu 21 points 9 months ago

As somebody originally from New York State, I firmly believe that we could render the Federal government irrelevant simply through economic means alone

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 9 months ago

Actually, given how America works the only thing that would be necessary to completely destroy the federal government would be to have 40 senators, easily achievable, refuse to pass a budget. As we've seen without a budget everything grinds to a halt and eventually the federal workers are going to leave for other jobs. This might have already happened by sharing competence and the need to suppress the Epstein files but you could do it intentionally if you so desired

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

If Biden had an ounce of guts he would have started a shadow court with ethics rules and ignored the subprime court when it was clear they were off the rails.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Trump has a lot of property in New York.

Sure would be a shame if he finally saw some consequences and lost a few dozen of them.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 22 points 9 months ago

Go ahead TACO.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Idk man, I see a lot of red caps at a certain party's rallies

red = obvious communist symbolism

I think those caps even say "make america great again" which obviously sounds like a communist slogan

I'd say we arrest these filthy communists 😏

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

The second act begins.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago

So that would mean that New York could stop paying federal taxes, no? I'm sure it contributes more than it receives

I always find it hilarious how red states and their leaders are all about cutting off funds to the blue states that fund their miserable existence. "We will secede from the US!" Ok Boomer, good luck with funding yourself as all of you are so mismanaged that you would fail to feed your own population within the year.

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 months ago

This is impeachable ... par fot the course with Trump and MAGA. So sick of injustice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Whenever these fucks try and paint Americans as terrorists and threaten to cut off anything they create monsters they can't control. Anyone he attacks becomes wildly popular and almost assures them victory. Especially if he has his thugs come rough them up.

Fuck you cancer. You take far too many good people while skipping this piece of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

You have nothing to lose but your chains.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 14 points 9 months ago

Your move, orange boy.

[-] frankiehollywood@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 months ago
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I'm sure it's perfectly legal to interfere with a free and fair election.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hellotypewriter@retrolemmy.com 7 points 9 months ago

The time to speak up is now. The place to do it is everywhere.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
576 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30941 readers
2789 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS