15
submitted 10 months ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/38836048

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] anachronist@midwest.social 16 points 10 months ago

I graduated in 2006. When I was in school the idea was that there wouldn't be any programmers left in the USA because it would all be offshore. But by the time I graduated it was fairly easy to find work. There was a slowdown in 2008 but tech did better than most other fields. This is where the idea comes from that tech will come back, I think. Tech is cyclical but it's not on the same cycle as other business, or hasn't been.

The whole AI thing is fake. What's really going on is another massive offshoring attempt. Everyone I know who's lost a job lost it to offshoring not AI. This is basically 2001 all over again. So the idea is that offshoring will not work out again and the jobs will come back. Is it true or is this time different? I'm not entirely sure.

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I work at a large company that is not considered one of the tech bros. I doubt we’re hiring graduates ever again.

For the record, we’re NOT all in on AI - far from it - but what we have found is that 98% of graduate hires aren’t productive and over-estimate their skills.

Maybe it’s different elsewhere in the world, but in and around Toronto, we’ve found that most CS grads have gone into the field because they think it will pay well. Most have no “adjacent” skills, such as VCS understanding, PRs, how work is broken down etc, but the biggest red flag though is just how few of them are interested in expanding their horizons. I currently have one junior right now working on an Android app and he seems incapable of moving past the MVP, java based patterns they learned in college.

The way I see it, Colleges are doing a very poor job right now, and the students are paying the price.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

software should be a trade, and treated like apprenticeships… some theory is needed, but it’s wild that anyone thinks 3 years of just theory is going to produce decent software engineers

[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

3 years of just theory is going to produce decent software engineers

Eh... isn't everybody encouraged to do projects? Like isn't every single class doing that? If so then it's not just theory, it's actual practice.

Also universities and engineering schools to suggest (some make it mandatory) to have internships. That's also practice.

I think only CS graduates who plan to become professors are perfectly fine with "just" theory but everybody else has actual opportunities to go being that.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

i wouldn’t say projects are practise… they’re kinda like a really basic simulator… you’re solving contrived problems so they’re not messy, you don’t have seniors etc, there’s no existing code base, no complex deployments, you’re not doing most of the non-technical parts of software engineering, and the list goes on and on and on

internships are great, but they’re really short

[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

In France at least internships are nearly 6 months long. It's nowhere near as long as a normal project length but still, it's quite a bit.

On the project aspect, it doesn't have to be done this way. Contributing to existing project is totally feasible. One could contribute a plugin to PeerTube, a patch to the Linux kernel, etc. Sure one can start from scratch, and maybe in some cases it's better (maybe less fear) but I think it's rare to be an actual requirement from teachers.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago

software is not a one and done, and foss is so far from a workplace. there’s a huge amount of software engineering that’s not writing code, and maintaining a code base over years is far different than a relatively isolated fire and forget

an internship wouldn’t cut it, and neither would foss contributions

[-] locuester@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago

I’ve been a pro software engineer for 30 years.

Colleges are doing a horrible job at relevant skill sets for sure. But also, much of the time what I’m seeking is passion for the field. In today’s world, kids with passion learn everything themselves in their teens and go directly to the workforce because they’d learn nothing at college. College became a place to go if you can’t figure it out yourself, which also means you lack the passion, hence you’re really not a great hire for a small company.

I currently never hire college grads anymore unless they’re older.

Things are different at enterprises. They need so many people that the passion requirement is dropped and you end up with tech leads who are passionate leading armies of worker bees who need constant oversight. This also works but has its own inefficiencies far outside the scope of this comment lol.

That’s how I see the state of the industry. People need to follow passion, not money. Unfortunately the incentives are misaligned by society in general. Not sure how to fix the value problem. For instance, teachers and childcare should be far more expensive and as such pay more. It’s a super heavy regulated sector tho, which is part of the problem.

But I digress. College for a general software engineering job is a complete waste.

[-] alexc@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

This isn’t digression - it’s pretty accurate to how I feel… Passion is the missing ingredient

[-] violentfart@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I personally would rather hire one of my gaming buddies than most people with stellar resumes, simply because they have a fantastic learning capability and comfort with tech.

[-] limer@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I forgot to add a comment about this yesterday:

There was a change in USA tax code that lead to many layoffs in the United States. Companies could no longer write off programmer’s salaries and benefits if they were doing pure research. It went from a yearly deduction on corporate tax to something very delayed. Making it effectively gone.

The tax code had been allowed for generations, then suddenly the companies had to actually pay the programmers instead of the federal government reimbursing them

I think it underscores how little each of us understands this very complex society, even when it’s being wrecked

[-] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 10 months ago

Because software makes the world go 'round, and people are better than LLMs at software, and companies like to make money, and building product makes money. At least that's why I think it's going to bounce back.

Look on the bright side: if AI ever gets better then humans at coding, it'll be better than humans at a lot of things and the global economy will collapse.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
15 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

43376 readers
207 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS