414
submitted 7 months ago by Redditsux@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] fletcher_bosom@lemmy.world 101 points 7 months ago

No worries Don, it's engraved on the edge of the medal for you to remember forver that it's not yours.

[-] farboo99@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

nah he immediately covered her name with his fav sharpie.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Unlike Donny’s ass, one quick wipe and the engraving be even bolder than before.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 32 points 7 months ago

It's just unfathomable to me that she thought it was a good idea to give it to him.

She won it for her work in promoting democracy, then she uses it to bribe someone to help her subvert democracy.

I cant help but feel like the Nobel committee really chose the wrong person.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

She's trying to buy her country back with a hunk of metal. It's understandable.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No she's trying to secure support for her candidacy.

[-] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

She won it by grifting. Just because someone is against an oppressive regime doesnt make them good nor democratic. The same with Navalny or for a less recent example Stauffenberg.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

If a “democracy” laureate can turn the Nobel medal into a gift to Donald Trump to secure leverage, it exposes the prize as elite propaganda, not a meaningful moral measure. And it reveals Machado’s “pro-democracy” image as branding for regime-change patronage, where legitimacy comes from foreign powerbrokers rather than Venezuelan popular sovereignty.

She was never pro democracy, look into her past and support for American coups. She's a right wing fascist, like the lot of them.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago

The same Nobel committee who gave one to Obama who has over 500 drone strikes under his belt?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

Should he not have attacked Al Qaida? Or is it just the drones you object to?

And how many drone strikes did Trump order, and what was the noncombatant death toll of those?

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago

I object to yet another bloodthirsty US warmonger.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

She's a member of the corrupt kleptocracy that Chavez kicked out. The fact that Maduro was a shit leader doesn't mean that the faction that had been driven out of power was any better.

I cant help but feel like the Nobel committee really chose the wrong person.

They really should shut that shitshow down. It's doing more harm than good.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Nothing a little filler can't solve.

[-] becausechemistry@piefed.social 69 points 7 months ago

I am once again begging people not to post a headline that starts with “Trump, 79,” that doesn’t end with. Well. You know

[-] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

It's the Daily Beast. They think it's cute for some reason, but it's just a hopium rag at this point.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

"79 rape charges" was what my brain autofilled

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago

Write to the daily beast then. The headline should match the linked article IMO.

[-] lando55@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago

TRUMP, 79, HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED ~alive and well~

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

His brutal and violent death?

[-] becausechemistry@piefed.social 3 points 7 months ago

I would prefer he dies surrounded by the people he loves doing the thing he loves to do the most.

(Nobody; eating fast food)

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fake obituary titles are such bullshit... it either gets peoples hopes up for nothing, or makes people sad for no good reason. Its one of the worse forms of clickbait.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 69 points 7 months ago

He got what he wanted. Why bother to remember who gave it to him? Its amazing how so few people understand what a narcissist truly is.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago

narcissist

Yeah, but it's that plus dementia. Fucker's basically 1 step away from mixing up camel and rhino on cognitive tests.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

He has been this way for his whole life. Sure now he can’t mumble a consistent lie but the root cause of trumps cruelty is narcissism. A utter lack of empathy. Its why people like him think empathy is bad. It interferes with their cruelty. Not realizing if no one had empathy they would have been finished a long time ago.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Why should he remember the name of a nobody who doesn't even have a Nobel Peace Prize?

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Is it dementia? It's is it that she's no longer of any importance to him? Probably both.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

There are several knowledgeable people who are quite convinced that he is in the late stages of dementia, some saying he has months left to live.

So that's a glimmer of hope.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Would love a source on this. I need a good Saturday morning read

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Oh, please let it be over soon

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Good to source these claims but don't use futurism.com as a source as it's full of made up shit articles

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I've seen it in multiple articles which I haven't saved unfortunately, but this is my main source which I keep coming back to for the lulz.

https://www.instagram.com/epistemiccrisis

You can also find him on YouTube if you don't prefer to visit Instagram.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

Evil never dies.

Wish it did though.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, no, for sure, someone else will come along and continue to be shitty. But I really want Trump specifically to stop existing.

[-] jdr8@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

“Sir, what about Greenland?”

“Who?!”

[-] MOARbid1@piefed.social 26 points 7 months ago

Now we just need him to forget to breathe, and we’ll be good.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 7 months ago

To be fair, she is brown and a woman

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

And an american puppet. Nobody respect traitors like her

[-] Widdershins@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

He's probably faking it because he's mad the chocolate coin she gave him chipped his veneers.

[-] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago

Clearly her name is Maria Southamerica. While she was in the US, after gifting Donnie his special award that he earned, she flew to California to meet with Tim Apple.

[-] elbiter@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

That Bitch. Her name is That Bitch.

[-] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The not Melania is also a valid choice

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago

Not surprising. During the run up to the election he got Nicky Jam to shill for him on stage and appeared to get him mixed up with Nicki Minaj...

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Can't remember the last person who he met with that gave him something he has always wanted but he can be trusted to make important trade and defensive judgements.

This would be bizarrely funny if so many people's lives weren't on the line.

[-] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 7 months ago

Ah shit. It's Corina Machado! I was going to say that even I don't remember since l don't remember for example who won the price for biology.

[-] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

What type of Starbucks coffee is this again?

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
414 points (97.9% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS