Zuck always looks like a damn android
hes constantly dowloading from facebook, the data of the users. the woman next to him is priscilla his wife, i think reid hofmman is one of them,
bezos, MUSK you can see in the picture, and thiel is there too.
He’s the speech to text robot for the cabal
Musk has red wine in his white wine glass! The horror!
Probably the blood of the children they're about to eat
Yes... Eat...
drinking muskadine
Wild? More like awkward as hell
It was wild because they didn't all meet on an island for a dinner.
It looks so fucking awkward. Like a black hole of charisma. Elon keeps asking when the wild party starts, and no one dares to tell him that it started 3 hours ago
Kill. them. all.
Wow. The things we're allowed to say here that would get us permabanned from Reddit 🙀
thank goodness we still have this freedom
I still don't follow how an international paedophile ring can be run openly on gmail and yahoo by a guy who didn't know where the shift key is, or how any punctuation worked.
The same way Epstein was able to get a plea deal that gave him immunity to federal charges back in 2006. Everyone involved is extremely well-connected.
BUT they want you to provide a photo ID, provide access to your location 24/7, and let them read your thoughts because they want to keep homeland security tight.
But a wide open pedo ring mail chain somehow eludes them.
That room must have been a total black hole of charisma.
It does look like the stereotypical meeting of evil persons in movies.
How can you be sure Zuckerberg was actually there and not just one of his robotic simulacrums?
Bold to assume there is a non-simulacrum Zuck
Hiding in a bunker in Hawaii
That one drowned in a vat, Simulacrum Prime runs the syndicate now
The lighting in that room is awful. So are the people, but yeah...
Kubrick wasn't there to do the lighting as well as in his last documentary
"Wrong day Elon, the wild party was yesterday."
They all look a bit tense and uptight.
Not really "wild" though.
The dinner looks pretty mundane to me. I get it, a well-connected socialite arranged a dinner with some high-profile tech-bros, but so what? Seems like a bunch of Capitalists, doing capitalism.
It's even more innocuous, this seems to be a social dinner with spouses etc. Basically the kind of thing that happens eery week in NYC or SF.
Don't mind me, just emailing myself a picture I secretly took of our totally mundane dinner. OK.
It's possible that they had all agreed to no pictures, but since it's Epstein, of course he took some anyway.
Clearly he was a smart guy so him risking the photo must be worth it? Well at least he thought it was worth it which makes you wonder why.
Lemme fix that for you
well-connected socialite who has already been convicted of child sex trafficking long before the image was taken
It only seems innocuous when divorced from context.
What's the date of the picture? Because yes, that does change things a bit.
We need to reclaim the wealth that has been stolen so our families don't end up serving their families in perpetuity.
Their children should have to live like regular kids.
It was a tech bro douche fest.
The key revelation here is that this was after his conviction. They knew what this dude was about and still showed up to a dinner party.
Musk and Zuck wanted to fuck kids.
The guy next to Musk looks familiar.
Who is it?
Looks like a Hollywood vision of a crime syndicate
"prosecute those who commited heinous crimes with Epstein"
says the guy who did 2 "Heil Hitlers" televised in front of the entire US of A
ima assume that Donald Duck slapped this photo on Elon's face when he started tweeting about releasing Epstein files. He probably also slapped this on Zuckerberg and Thiel's faces on other occasions too.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.