lol, "The country voted for a corrupt, racist pedophile over a woman twice, but maybe they'll go for a corrupt, racist woman!"
The US: "i don't think we can overlook the woman part."
The US: "We can ignore shooting a puppy in the face, but being a woman is a step too far."
No joke, for real shit I was told by coworkers after that last election.
We live in the stupidest timeline. I wouldn't dismiss the possibility that the first woman president could be someone in the Sarah Palin / Marjorie Taylor Greene / Kristi Noem model.
Please don't ruin my day like that.
Corrupt, animal abusing, racist woman.
I wouldn’t be surprised if she just heard somebody else say cabinet meeting and she thought it sounded cool.
That's what I thought also. Maybe she thinks DHS is itself a cabinet and she's leading the meetings.
That was my thought as well.
I also had that thought.
Noem, dubbed “Ice Barbie” for her love of cosplaying in uniform roles...
It's also because she's made of plastic.
I think she's just a narcissist.
Damn, 200 million is actually a lot of money. I wonder who the money actually went to , to make any ads. I would have filmed a few ads for $100 million.
I believe she had her past campaign staff create a company and gave them the money, with no oversight or review that I know of that she didn't just give hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayers money to her friends for no where near that amount of work. Company supposedly was created within days before of the payout
So embezzlement then. Another felonious POS.
Yep. "Safe America Media, LLC" was incorporated in Delaware on February 6th, 2025. Received a $143 million-dollar, expedited, emergency DHS contract on February 13th, 2025.
Delaware doesn't require LLCs to list principal agents, so there's no telling who is receiving this money without a court subpoena. Probably why she's on the outs with Trump because he didn't get to wet his beak.
I would film them for $50 million.
Why would the Administration be upset that she is planning a Presidential run?
Unless they already have plans either to steamroll a Trump 3rd term, or have something like Don Jr. run on a transparent platform of "Vote for me, get my dad too".
Or, maybe it's the fact that there's only so far a woman can go in MAGA. So they're really more upset that she might aspire to being more than a Secretary....
Simply imagining a time when Trump is no longer in charge is probably viewed as an unforgivable sin.
That maga face ain't gonna cut it
Meh, either calling her team a 'cabinet' is not a big issue or she's too stupid to realize it's an issue. I don't think it says anything about her ambitions.
I for one, am getting tired of people and media alike, constantly downplaying and under estimating the motives and ambitions of these people. For gods sakes people, they're showing you who they are, just fucking believe them.
I believe she's a fascist and an idiot but exaggerated stories like this don't really tell anything new about. She does worse things all the time.
Should start playing into it. Nothing would piss her boss off more than people treating someone else as his equal. Would probably fire her after the first news headline.
They’re not fake, it’s a real dollhouse
Well okay, but the cabinet meetings were the only thing about her that was fake.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News