390
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Pentagon officials are reportedly struggling to devise a plan to spend the extra $500 billion that Donald Trump wants to give the bloated, fraud-ridden agency in the next fiscal year, vindicating criticism of the funding proposal as immensely wasteful.

The Washington Post reported over the weekend that “White House aides and defense officials have run into logistical challenges surrounding where to put the money, because the amount is so large.”

The extra $500 billion, endorsed by the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, would push annual US military spending to a staggering $1.5 trillion after the Trump administration and congressional Republicans enacted unprecedented cuts to federal nutrition assistance and Medicaid last summer.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 90 points 6 months ago

Hmm let's give an extra $500 billion to an agency that has failed all of its financial audits...

[-] TheFogan@programming.dev 23 points 6 months ago

Which, some how the Dodge waste fraud and abuse team, never seemed to get around to investigating... They claimed they would, but I guess were too busy gutting everything that was investigating musks companies before getting bored with it.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

Don’t forget the canceling of any services that weren’t exclusively for white men.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Give all of it to the army corps of engineers and build public transportation networks.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 17 points 6 months ago

Someone should let them know that when it actually comes to war, railroads can be used to efficiently transport weaponry and vehicles

And the same railroads could be used for civilian transit when there's no war

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Rails can do that, yes. The thing is, the military is supposed to be used outside the US. Internal military rail networks only really good for putting down internal dissent and attacking neighbors.

No, it's better to give the money to an agency focused on designing a rail network from an economic and transportation basis.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] starchylemming@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

what the fuck? a good idea??? get out

[-] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Rapid urban troop movers. Must be grade separated.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Goddamn it, we've just invented trains again.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No, trains are stupid. We need cars. Well, we need trucks. And we could get a lot more efficiency if we added more trailers to the trucks and made them bigger so we'd need fewer drivers;. And dedicated lanes for the trucks! And since we're giving them their own lane, we could optimize it by changing the material on the wheels and the road to resist rolling friction, maybe steel on steel? And since truckers tend to doze off, we could make grooves in the road so they stay on course...

Goddamn it!

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 51 points 6 months ago

This has been going on for decades.

Reagan wanted a 'six hundred ship' Navy. The actual Navy had no idea what he was talking about.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Poseidon won’t even know what hit him!

[-] WagnasT@piefed.world 31 points 6 months ago

remember when they had to keep increasing the budget to sustain 2 war zones for decades and then when they pulled out of both Iraq and afganistan they...kept increasing the budget???? Where the fuck is the money going?

[-] karashta@piefed.social 10 points 6 months ago

Into creating things that destroy rather than things that are good and last, because destruction lines the pockets of capitalists better.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Failed wunderwaffe projects and grift, but I repeat myself

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 24 points 6 months ago

I've got an idea. Use it to buy weapons for Ukraine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 22 points 6 months ago

But there's no money for public health, public education or anything that helps people.

[-] kofe@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Of course silly, otherwise that would mean money spent on undesirables

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Here's an idea, give it back

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 months ago

If returned to tax payers, this would mean a $3,030 payment for every single one of us.

That'd at least pay the rent one month in Trump's economy.

[-] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Maybe a carton of eggs, even?

[-] MrEff@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

The really crazy part is when you look at it as a percentage of the budget and compare it to pre war levels. It isn't what you think. In 2000 the budget was $304 billion, a total of 16.7% of the federal budget. Then 2 wars later of ballooning costs and it grew all the way up to $962 billion (the 2025 approved budget. Not counting the random $500 billion he is trying to add in). But this is now only 13.7% of thr total budget. Somehow the percentage has gone down.

Now, if you know numbers you should know that percentages get messy and are misleading to look at. The real question is what the fuck is going on with the giant ballooning budget that has gotten spending so out of control that this monstrous defense spending is now somehow a lower percentage than pre-war spending??? And the real kicker is that we are ballooning on spending, but none of it is going to actually helping the people paying the taxes! None of it is helping built up infrastructure, invest in education, build communities -nothing that helps build this country.

Trump is blowing through money and we doing even get anything out of it.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 6 months ago

I just read that at the current rate of spending, by the end of Trump's administration in 2028, Trump will be responsible for 55% of the national debt.

Remember that the next time some MAGA claims it's time to reign in spending...during a Democratic administration.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

He's paying himself, his family, his cronies, his handlers, his gestapo, and his billionaire donors.

All with taxpayer money that mostly comes from the working class, who are getting screwed over.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I’m sure they’ll give it to Israel somehow

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago

They should spend it all on passing a financial audit, for once.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

Accountability on their own activities? Good luck with that. They want surveillance on everyone else but would rather stay in the shadows themselves.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 11 points 6 months ago

That is America's biggest problem right now. Forget affordability, forget inflation. It's the sartorial problem to beat all problems: the pockets of American politicians are not deep and strong enough for all the money they have to line them with. Just think of all the poor sweatshops in Vietnam that have to re-cut, re-fit, and re-sew all the pockets.

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 9 points 6 months ago

Give it to the poor, build housing and use soldiers for the labour under a contractor? Anything besides blow people up and fraud please.

[-] 3jane@piefed.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Trump wants to buy the Army's loyalty.

You can't have a coup without the army. He's replaced the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with bootlickers probably.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 6 months ago

Then give it the fuck back!

[-] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

How much does a Battlestar Galactica cost, we're gonna need one

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

It's one Battlestar Galactica, Michael. What could it cost?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Shit, I thought the US military budget was at $960 billion, not $1.5 trillion.

How about universal healthcare and a high speed rail network?

[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Just give it to Lockheed and Raytheon as a tip

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

...And yet no one in power right now will push back against it because they don't want to be seen as "weak on defense"

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Give to Ukraine?

[-] ClownStatue@piefed.social 3 points 6 months ago

Is there an index fund of just defense contractors?

[-] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I can think of a few military contractors that would live a cool 500b

[-] digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

The rate things are going maybe they should plumb it into Baby Oil to lube themselves up for the pedo party protection racket. They all seem quiet apt at following their chiefs orders.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
  1. Add lobster as topping choice for daily departmental pizza parties.
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
390 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31022 readers
465 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS