287
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A refund system for businesses that paid tariffs which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Donald Trump imposed without the constitutional authority to do so is scheduled to launch Monday.

Importers and their brokers will be able to begin claiming refunds through an online portal beginning at 8 a.m., according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the agency administering the system.

It’s the first step in a complicated process that also might eventually lead to refunds for consumers who were billed for some or all of the tariffs on products shipped to them from outside the United States.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 132 points 5 months ago

Companies already increased prices more than the tariffs cost them and we paid them. Now they get extra profits on top of their profits while we don't get jack shit. Companies won't decrease prices back to pre-tariff levels after they get their refunds either so.....fuck consumers I guess!

Hurray I love capitalism!

[-] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 months ago

Sounds and feels very much like the PPP scams during the pandemic.

But really guys, it’s the welfare moms and immigrant childcare workers that are scamming this country and the reason there are no more $1 burgers to be found anywhere!!!! /s

Time and time again, it’s the end user/consumer that the buck gets passed to. The owner class gets bailed out by us from the problems they create for us, then they tell us there’s no money to be found to provide even the most base level of assistance. And when we pitch enough of a fit for them to throw us a few pennies, it’s shoved in our faces again and again as some sort of handout that ‘proves’ how reliant we are on them. Abuse tactics 101, and like the abused we don’t know where else to go.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago

Yeah where's the portal where consumers get to apply for a refund check?

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 80 points 5 months ago

So corporations get paid twice

[-] dan1101@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Yeah a condition of them collecting the tariff back from the government should be repaying their customers for tariff costs passed onto them. Otherwise it's just largely another corporate handout.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 67 points 5 months ago
[-] Shindo66@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago
[-] b34k@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

So does this mean DHL is going to refund me the tariff fee they charged on a couple of my international orders in the last year?

[-] Neverbeaten@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

We paid an illegal tax and now corporations are getting our money back.

How is this not theft and equally illegal as the tariffs in the first place?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

There are a number of class action suits that are trying to get the refunds funnelled back to the original consumers.

[-] nocturne@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago

That does not help the businesses that closed due to them sadly though.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

And then they'll pass them on to the consumers, right?

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 months ago

I knew this would be the route… gotta screw the consumers… but I was really hoping it would have been returned as a tax credit on your 2026 taxes. That would be the easiest way of getting the money back to those who ultimately paid it

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I agree, but the thing is… it's impossible to know exactly how much extra anyone paid (consumers), because most businesses probably ate some of the cost but of course had to pass most of it along. But it's fuzzy, whereas what the businesses paid - there's a record of that.

Nevermind that they passed it along...

It's stupid and unfair and was illegal, but of course we can't prosecute the President for anything...........

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

You aren't American if you haven't experienced repeatedly bailing out businesses with your tax dollars.

[-] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

I wonder if someone's going to compile a list of a bunch of companies that raised prices due to the tariffs, and keep them up them after

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

It would be faster to make a list of companies that didn't

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Doesn't matter. America are those corporations. The rest of us are just labor with no real rights. And we love them for it here. Such a said nation.

[-] Dionysus@leminal.space 13 points 5 months ago

Corporations paid for his election, who thinks this wasn't a plan all along? Plain sight hidden tax which can also be used to boost corpo bottom lines and force inflation.

[-] daychilde@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I humbly disagree. No business wanted tariffs^[Oh, I'm sure you can find an exception or two]. They knew it would wreak havoc with higher prices, driving down profits. That they are getting this windfall was certainly not guaranteed at the outset.

Furthermore, Trump did this pretty unilaterally. Not after pressure from businesses.

So no, I don't think this was a plan all along.

[-] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 9 points 5 months ago

And it'll all trickle down to us!!! /s

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
287 points (99.3% liked)

News

39254 readers
2004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS