11
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] notgold@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago

There should be an mutually tied tax for this. When the rate goes up for borrowers so does the tax on retirement savings. It's bullshit to hit the people with the most expenses only.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

ues, but that change won't come by voting ALP/LNP/ONP (the latter just hate ex-pats)

Until the Overton Window moves nothing much changes.

[-] YeahToast@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Probably doesn't need to just hit "retirement savings" but you could say savings as a whole. At least that way offset accounts wouldn't be negatively impacted.

[-] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago

We could also not hit people with mortgages at all. In the US all mortgages are fixed-rate for the whole term of the loan.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

sure, you'd need to socalise banking for that to occur, it's only because of US Government backed Freddie and Fannie offering that deal that commercial banks had to compete.

[-] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Just raise it. Inflation is awful.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

The (RBA’s) problem is we’re all too rich

The bank’s fight against inflation is much harder due to the extraordinary boom in household wealth, which is keeping the economy motoring along. Expect interest rates to stay high.

https://slrpnk.net/post/37557537

[-] ljoe@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

There needs to be more than one interest rate.

[-] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 4 months ago

There already is. The RBA only sets the "cash rate". Your mortgage isn't at the cash rate, and neither are the loans businesses take out. They're influenced by it, and a lot of banks will essentially have their rates rise and fall in lockstep with it, especially for regular people who don't have the negotiating power to lock in special agreements, but they don't have to.

[-] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

That's kind of the case in the US. They don't have variable-rate home loans, so only business borrowing is affected by the US Federal Reserve's interest rate.

[-] Dimand@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

That will stop people wasting so much money on checks notes fuel and food. In the RBA's defence, they are damned either way, and they have no other influence mechanism.

[-] minimumchips@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago

And consequently this degrades peoples trust in our public institutions. "They only have one lever". Yeah, and it isn't having the intended effect.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago
[-] No1@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Por que no los dos?

this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

AusFinance

1383 readers
1 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS