submitted 2 years ago by marvinfreeman@lemmy.world to c/running@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I didn't know there was all that much difference in shoe foams.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] _wizard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

IMO, foam just benefits those that heelstrike. Course, I'm a toe runner, so I'm in a totally different camp.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is there not foam under the entire shoe? Is your heel not contacting the ground whatsoever during a given stride?

[-] python@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Ballet strats

[-] TeXitoi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The best energy return, most durable, and cheaper is no shoes! Infinite value for money!

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Personally the moment I saw that a foam was described as "boring" I new this was bullshit opinion and not science

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023

26 points (96.4% liked)

Running

3683 readers

2 users here now

A place for runners.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS