this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30464 readers
562 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] msprout@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

What's the upper limit on how many companies and industries Microsoft can absorb? I swear to God once we start seeing Bing Chat in cars, I'm done.

[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All these 10 year deals they've made with other companies, will they just be rendered void if the deal doesn't go through?

[–] Silverhand@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I imagine most of those are contingent on the merger going through.

[–] nob0dy@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Good. This deal would have killed Activision as we know it. Microsoft would continued their strategy of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

[–] Wrathofcon@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

This deal would have killed Activision

I see this as an absolute win

[–] CliodhnaBaskerville@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't mean to sound like a corporate simp, but TBH this was one merger I was half-rooting for, since Microsoft have been overall more pro-consumer than Activision-Blizzard over the past few years. I was kind of hoping they would clean house and restructure Blizzard in particular.

[–] j_erasmo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the misconception here is that Microsoft would STAY pro-consumer after acquiring everything under the sun. Companies are forced to be pro-consumer when there is actual competition, and the opposite is almost always true without regulation.

[–] WraithGear@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

You are probably right. Remember xBox’s past shenanigans. Its not even healthy to rely on valve to be benevolent forever let alone Microsoft. To bad Activision has to be terrible too.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I mean is killing Activision as we know it really a bad thing? I can't imagine Microsoft doing much worse with them then what they've been doing.

[–] simple@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Extinguish what? It's not like ActiBlizz aren't already employing the most anti-consumer tactics out there. The only part of Activision that was good was Toys for Bob, and they effectively killed it.

[–] Subito@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

This is good for ~~bitcoin~~ gaming

[–] GolGolarion@pathfinder.social 2 points 1 year ago
[–] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They've moved the dispute to a federal court, ATVI believe this to actually be a positive move as it will speed up the resolution and they believe they have a strong case.