this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
658 points (98.0% liked)

science

28126 readers
620 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Humans evolved to pay close attention to danger, but today that instinct is being overwhelmed by an endless supply of bad news from around the world. Researchers say the answer isn’t to stop following current events—it’s to build healthier habits around how, when, and where we get our news.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 224 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh, great… more bad news.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to read this in Marvin's voice from HHTTG

[–] smeenz 19 points 1 month ago

Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they've got me delivering bad news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Your brain wasn't designed at all.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 67 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Iteratively designed by evolution to maximize survival, I guess

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, so you could easily say we evolved to, or our brains evolved to... And so on

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

No, in fact that is still teleological.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah I dunno about design as much as iterative adaptations over incomprehensibly large periods of time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Figure of speech. Perhaps "optimized" would be more accurate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the people who are in charge and doing evil things know this and are using it to their advantage.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It's literally written down as part of the playbook.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago (8 children)

My brain was not designed for anything. It was not designed.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"The human mind has not adapted to this level of bad news"

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Yet

I'm going to stare into the abyss until it blinks first

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Sure it has, meet my brain's healthy levels of bitter sarcasm and bitter cynicism!

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I feel like it kind of has.

Otherwise, people who are about 40+ years old would all be driven mad by now.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 30 points 1 month ago

Don’t tell me that then, you’re just making it worse.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm not sure I understand what "build healthier habits around how, when and where we get our news" exactly means and how that would help. I mean if TACO drops bombs on little kids, I can't think of how digesting this differently is going to be any healthier for me.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago

One thing I see a lot is the same event repackaged repeatedly with various headlines from different angles to elicit despair and outrage. If you heard about it once already, that is probably enough.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Spending an hour a day reading news from reputable sources is a lot healthier than doomscrolling questionable content for 8 hours on Reddit and Instagram.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It means that you are not in control of any of it. You can't impact any of it meaningfully as a single force, at least in real time. People used to watch a "news hour" once a day. You could artificially recreate that, and then detatch for the other 23 hours using self control, muted phone notifications and browser filter extensions. And maybe your brain will thank you.

Of course you could have a separate rule for local alerts that may be more relevant, but local news is dying unfortunately, soo..... You could probably just check in once a week to see how the surviving local paper verbatim reprints favorable press releases from the city's PR person that they retain from the local municipal consultant group with a forgettable acronym.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I am painfully aware.

[–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Switching from Reddit to Lemmy did wonders for my mental health. Less time doom scrolling, more time to engage with my hobbies

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel the opposite, my feed is almost entirely people describing how the world is falling apart, how communism is good but not that communism, and Linux

[–] specimen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Absolutely, lemmy has such a downer vibe to it, it’s not doing me any good using this platform lately.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Isn't this the thing we are doing by being on Lemmy? My mental state is better when I scroll the feed here, as opposed to scrolling reddit.

I do both still, but I'm nearing the phase where Lemmy gets more attention.

It's just fucked that I read too much so I might run out of content on Lemmy which pushes me to read the news then back to reddit untill I wake up again

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You might take some of the time you're doomscrolling and read a silly book. Not a lot, like 30 mins.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've found my attention span destroyed now. I don't read much any more at all, it's kinda sad.

I think it's also because I work from home and a commute used to isolate me and I'd be forced to read.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] c64z86@piefed.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I'd argue that it was never designed for this much stimulation full stop. All the constant noise and things competing for attention all the time around you. Bad news is just the nasty icing on the cake.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Title is true even without the last two words.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly it's true with just the first 5 words.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a problem I struggle with philosophically. I have lived in the US with a degree of privilege and I feel the price for that should include knowing how the proverbial sausage is made, that is, knowing all the crap that is being done to allow me to live in (meager) comfort.

It's Poor Things cranked up to eleven. The British empire is holding the beer of the American one. It's just too much.

The continual rush of news, propelled by the addictive properties of the YouTube algo, have driven me quite mad, albeit, I suffer from behavioral health problems already. I haven't found a balance to this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I just stopped following a lot of it. Even reputable places resort to hyperbole. I switched off for my own mental health. I still know what's going on. I do not discuss it on social media.

Ultimately, to handle the fact that things are going to shit, you either choose, despair, ignorance or indifference. The last was my choice.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ultimately, to handle the fact that things are going to shit, you either choose, despair, ignorance or indifference. The last was my choice.

you've missed a important option.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

I find my days to be much better overall when I don't spend a lot of time online over an extended period. I’m more productive, more creative, and less anxious. I still find out all the impactful stuff, anyway.

Its not like knowing the bad news as it happens helps me in any way, genuinely, so why bother wasting all my bandwidth on it?

My dumb monkey brain is meant to tell five kinds of poisonous berries from the one edible kind. What does it do with an international pedophile ring, climate collapse, and rising inequality? Shuts down is what it does.

[–] Dreamer@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

Maybe if we stopped letting bad things happen, there wouldn't be so much bad news.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've largely stopped actively following news because

  • most of it is stuff we knew already
  • I already find out all that I need to know and more involuntarily through occasional social media visits

I'd like to read summaries of a given week's news on the world, EU, national, and maybe local level once a week, tho. I'll check if there's anything like this for the world and EU scale and report back here if there is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Our brains were not evolved for any of this. The modern world is very alien compared to the mundane life of hunter gatherers.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I use RSS now for news.

Its been so liberating. I can read offline, save articles for later, no ads or paywalls, no algorithms, no bullshit.

I highly recommend.

[–] ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been doing the same. The issue is finding high quality feeds with full articles. Most are just a snippet of the article with a link saying "read the full story at..." (The Verge, PBS, The Guardian). Others are even worse and just link directly to the shit-laden website (Ars Technica). The best quality news feeds I've found are Techdirt and The Intercept. Would you care to share some good RSS news feeds you've found?

load more comments (2 replies)

what's your favourite rss aggravator?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

In Soviet Russia, observing an event changes your outcomes.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's part of why I'm now only looking at socials for like 30m a day- and usually only lemmy and YT at that. I have enough problems to worry about over here, I don't need to know about all these other problems that I couldn't even fix if I tried

[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

bad news, everyone: bad news is bad for you!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›