84
Let's take a break from super hero movies for awhile. Pick another genre to run into the ground and we'll come back to these after a few years.
I think next up is westerns again or zombie movies again, it's all on a big carousel
Fallout is Western AND Zombies. So, yeah, that tracks.
And it's based on a video game, which seems to be the current trend.
New and fresh doesn't sell. The most brilliant body horror scifi work I'd seen in years, Scavenger's Reign, didn't even muster a second season.
If you like body horror The Substance was pretty good. Oh and Scavenger's Reign reminded me a little of Fantastic Planet (La Planète sauvage).
I think the zombie theme is too fresh. I feel like it was only yesterday that everyone was talking about Walking Dead, so I guess it's time to remake the old spaghetti westerns. Hell, I'm surprised nobody already has remade The Good, The Bad, The Oxford Comma, and The Ugly.
I'm up for Firefly again and open to more space westerns.
Well they ARE doing Firefly again, but in animation form
Here I was holding out for pog form
At least pogs are physical media
The track record for “reborn as animation” is much more promising.
I find that recent superhero movies expect you to understand the world context from the kajillion movies and books that came before it. So much time is spent showing something or someone on screen with ominous music that makes it clear that you should already know what this means or who it is. I don’t have 700 hours of superhero world research to do before watching a movie, and I have started to hate this genre because the movies are becoming barely comprehensible on their own.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I stopped watching MCU like 10 years ago; DC is whatever too. It's just formulated crap. What happened to art?
I don't know about art, but James Gunn has a knack for entertaining movies.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It still exists
DC tends to be stronger on the TV side, like with Peacemaker, Young Justice, or (so I hear) My Adventures with Superman.
I didn’t see the supergirl movie because I knew she couldn’t possibly live up to DCAU supergirl.
…It’s still relative though. There’s a lot of DC TV junk (or junk food).
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's still going strong, it's just not made by Disney or Universal
Having seen it, I thought it was generic and the main plot very villain of the week. Backstory/flashbacks were decent. Based on what they were going for in the trailer... They needed to mix it up, my pitch: An R rating, let her crush some skulls. Let her not be Superman. Think Brightburn. Let her have an arc. Break some spines, accidentally and on purpose. show her having trouble controlling her new found powers on yellow star systems, laser people in half, not having to grow up on earth like Clark slowly learning to control his powers. Let her vent and pick fights in rough cesspools across the galaxy while binge drinking! :::spoiler That makes these Brigand folk, not just villains of the week, they're tougher, they can take a punch, they hurt Krypto::: and they're just what the doctor ordered, theyre cathartic... 😌💀🩸🩹
Yeah no, we don't need to turn every superhero movie into a gritty nolanverse-like
We need space for fun, for whimsy, for brightness
load more comments
(2 replies)
It's not a loss. It's a tax writeoff.
Yeah it was number 2 at the box office. The only reason that's a failure is if they set expectations wrong. Sounds like they wanted it to fail.
Unfortunately the only lesson will be "Woman superhero no make money."
That we want MORE superheroes, obviously
Stop making infeasible movies?
wasn't like the number two movie last week?
Maybe don't spend over $100M on a movie?
100m is probably just the marketing budget. It's all a huge scam
Brace yourselves, here comes The Discourse...
Lesson - do not adapt a loved story only to make it worse in every way. Why adapt on of the most beautiful colorful comics and make it only brown and gray?
They literally didn't do that?
It's full of life and colour.
Tell me you didn't watch the movie without telling me you didn't watch the movie
Why would I watch a DC movie only to have it reboot 5 years later and re-hash the same story again
I enjoyed it. Sucks they didn't manage the finances better.
DC flopped during Marvel's prime era because thew threw away what made DC media unique and tried to copy paste Marvel's style like an ad.
After MCU hit endgame, there really was no plan forward so Disney did what Disney does best and started chuking money at new movie ideas expecting it to rake in the same amount as before.
DC meanwhile did another reboot and ended up back at square one trying to copy any superhero genre film that succeded which led them nowhere.
This genre is effectively dead for the foreseeable future because neither studio tried to experiment with the formula outside of single hits which doesn't bring in enough money to satisfy the corporate overlords at Disney and WB.
They demand an output of several projects a year which is too high for creating something genuinely new.
Rest of Hollywood probably won't greenlight anything because of oversaturation, and the two comic book giants will continue to pump out slop in an a poor effort to maximize profits like they already did with every other franchise.
For me, the main stream super hero genre ended with Logan.
I will still see the occasional Spiderman film as a treat. (Skipping this years Tom Holland one. Waiting for beyond the spiderverse.)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
84 points (93.8% liked)
movies
4007 readers
464 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS