56
Suicide food (en.wikipedia.org)
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] tyler@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago

Douglas Adams did a great play on this in The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.

[-] qualia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I was also going to comment that the wikipedia page omits the cow who wishes to be eaten!

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago

Meet the meat

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I was just about to mention this...

[-] bizarroland@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This would technically be vegan because the animal chose to die.

However, in a slightly different note, I am far more concerned about mascots that sell their own kind. If you see a chicken talking about how good company X's chicken is, then you've got a race traitor chicken mascot.

And that is far more evil than serving suicidal pig sausage.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Does that mean that it's technically vegan to eat roadkill or other carrion?

[-] bizarroland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Some people are still against it, but technically that would be recycling material rather than killing an animal for sustenance, so, by the technical bylaws of veganism, it is not non-vegan to eat roadkill.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I don't know what you think makes you an authority on this subject but once again you are just making shit up.

[-] bizarroland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

username checks out

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

No. It is not vegan to exploit the body of an animal, even if it already happens to be dead.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This would technically be vegan because...

It is not. Vulnerable individuals like livestock do not have the capacity to consent. Veganism does not recognize any such loophole. Veganism forbids the exploitation of animals. It doesn't matter if you convince yourself "the animal had a good life" or "the animal gets something in exchange" or "the animal likes it for some reason"; it's still exploitation.

[-] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

I think they're saying if the animals were sentient, as they're clearly depicted. It's a silly hypothetical not a philosophical argument.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, we know that. The hypothetical here is that the animal is fully aware and fully consents to being killed and eaten. Obviously this is not a thing in the real world; it’s just a thought experiment.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 5 points 1 month ago

In the UK, it’s the norm for fried chicken shops to have a cartoon mascot that’s typically a chicken, often wearing a cowboy hat, and nominally if not explicitly promoting the taste of the flesh of its species.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Wikipedia

5270 readers
150 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS