this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
15 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

2202 readers
8 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom ~ Alternate frontends ~ Donate

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NZ police being absolutely useless as usual. "it's a civil matter", never mind that the cat is registered in their name.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dave 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NZ police being absolutely useless as usual. “it’s a civil matter”, never mind that the cat is registered in their name.

I have many thoughts about this case, but in general I feel like it really isn't a matter for the police. Police are an enforcement agency, an ownership dispute does seem like a matter for a court or tribunal or some sort.

This story just makes me think of all the people who were burgled but the police didn't have time to investigate.

[–] Viper_NZ 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How exactly is it a civil matter? An animal is property, surely this is simple theft.

[–] Dave 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From my understanding, the animal belonged to one side and was microchipped by the other. Who do the police return it to?

[–] Ilovethebomb 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, the registered owner was the one who had the chip registered to them.

[–] Dave 1 points 6 days ago

Cats don't legally have to have a chip, so if I take all the neighbourhood cats and get them microchipped, do I become the legal owner?