this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
147 points (95.7% liked)

Privacy

50045 readers
1047 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nocteb@feddit.org 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We have nurtured a culture of radical tolerance.

Some people have nurtured a radical intolerance against funding right extremism.

[–] divinesteel@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Not gonna give them a single cent from now on.

[–] yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Gee, I wonder what the far-right thinks about letting leftists speak freely?

The conflation between a chud using mullvad vs using the profits from mullvad to fund a political party... Tf

[–] yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

"Why did I, a libertarian anarchist, support the Örebro Party (ÖP), which is neither, with a donation?"

shocked face

[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 96 points 1 week ago (28 children)

There is no stance that Mullvad can take on this in order to make me want to stay with them, since this is not an abstract, philosophical matter. It's simple: Daniel partially owns a pro profit company. I pay Daniel's company some money. Daniel reaps - as he should - parts of the company's revenue as wage (which is my money). Daniel uses that wage to fund whatever the hell he wants - as he should - with my money. I'm either fine with contributing to this or not. Period. I am not fine with it, so I'm flirting with IVPN.

load more comments (28 replies)

even if you do believe in freedom of expression and information, why would you donate to a fascist group which have been using suppression of expression - either it is attacking immigrants, pushing age gate laws, or attacking trans rights - as their path to power?

[–] sp3ctre@feddit.org 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have no problem, if the service gets used for things I don't agree with (I will not know anyway). But I do have a problem when one of the founders I paid (with the money from my subscription) openly supports this kind of party. No hard feelings, but with that knowledge, I prefer to give my money to another VPN.

Got my refund from Mullvad so I'm fine now.

[–] speakupattheback@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"aren't we living in a multicultural democracy, why can't the minorities and the racists just get along and be respectful of each others' ideas"

Absolutely pathetic response. I'm less likely to use them now than before I read this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 week ago (15 children)

It should be clear by now how the party donation relates to this. Mullvad does not condone it, nor condemn it.

If they don't condemn donating to Nazis then they're Nazi's. Pretty clear. Proton VPN it is.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Proton has dodgy dealings too. This whole situation sucks

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Proton complimented one Trump policy about privacy which is stupid but they're not donating to literal Nazi's at least.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think they're severely underestimating how valuable the recommendation of techies/word of mouth effect is to their business...

load more comments (2 replies)

Most predictable response ever. Some shite about the free market of ideas and some other shite about the need to engage with "ideas you personally dislike".

In other words, we should give fascists a seat at the table and hope we can debate them away. Been there done that, doesn't work.

I don't expect a company to just condemn fascism completely unprompted. But in a situation like this, if you can't even commit to taking action to ensure that a fascist party does not receive any of your funding again, then your mission isn't worth shit.

I'm sure that the people who would be forcibly "remigrated" by this particular political party would not feel very free from authority and surveillance.

[–] Dave8008@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have had a Mullvad account for many years. I now have an iVPN acc. It's a very simple choice for me. If Mullvad's success results in funding far right racists then I don't care to assist that happening

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

They try to distance themselves from it as much as they can, but at the end of the day he is using money he obtained from Mullvad (us) in ways some people don't like.

The only true way to stop it is for the CEO to leave the company and sell all shares and stakes...

Or to simply stop giving Mullvad money, which is what I've done. There are plenty other privacy focused vpns that don't have this issue.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a weak statement. Not one mention of how the donation most likely came (in part) from customer funds.

Here's the statement from Mullvad's co-founder himself, which at least has some substance on the why: https://dberntsson.info/2026/07/20/orebropartiet/

[–] omxxi@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

Interesting reading to try to get into the mind of a left thinker voting extreme right. Although I didn't share such opinion, his argument sounds like "I don't trust/like my government, so, let's support Hitler to do some opposition with the hope that he won't be too powerful to enforce his policies what I don't share". Historically that doesn't end well and it sounds really naive.

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago

Self-censorship out of fear is an even bigger dampener than direct censorship.

Man, I hate having to think about the effects of my actions before I do something. It's so much better to just do things, and then see if there are consequences.

/s

load more comments
view more: next ›