this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
192 points (98.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6816 readers
456 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

Sure there is. Just take it from the people and charge the ridiculous prices for what they do use. Voila, plenty of datacenter water.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 35 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Which means the Residents will have to RATION their Water Usage going Forward!

-Britain's Government!

#LabourIsForThePeople

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One cup of tea in the morning and one in the evening should be enough.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Thing is tea will be the last thing they ration, putting ANY limit, even as rediculously high as 20 a day, would cause riots in the street.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is… Is that ridiculously high?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's above average, but I wouldn't call it ridiculous. It's just over a cup an hour.

If someone hit 50 cups I would be worried. At that point it's better to move to a bigger mug, rather than more cups.

We get our whenever the bell goes to tell us to get our tea.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

When I was a web developer I definitely drank about that much a day. Whenever anybody was bored with what they were doing they would just go make a kettle as an excuse to bunk off for a bit.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You can buy all the tea you want. Just the water is rationed.

[–] voodoo3dfx@retrolemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

2 cups an hour is taking it easy in our house!

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's already hosepipe bans

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only in some areas, no restrictions where I live fortunately. Just dumped a couple hundred litres on some food I am growing.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well we are in the midst of a massive drought.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

We always seem to be in the middle of a drought and yet the water companies never seem to be in any rush to fix burst pipes. Odd that

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

This is Britain we're talking about. The UK notoriously makes awful decisions all the time. They'll go ahead.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

What are you talking about, plebe? No more showers for you!

[–] mikenurre@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Billionaires do not care about the plebs' demands for water. They never did.

[–] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Plebs don’t need luxuries.

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or even essentials.

The capitalist class'll charge for air as soon as they can.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing is the 1% think that they can do that. But if they did everyone would just die and then they would have no money. It's like the idiotic bunker plans to survive the end of the world, what's their long-term strategy, they're going to survive the environmental collapse they themselves caused and then what they're going to do, live in the bunkers for the rest of eternity?

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 1 points 6 days ago

Unironically yes, I think that's their plan.

Micro fiefdoms for themselves and their immediate descendents and fuck the rest. A power structure and loyal caste to be their knights/enforcers.

There's a good reason why many lefty thinking heads are calling this techno-feudalism, and comparing TESCREL ideas to medieval ideologies.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surveillance centres are how I'm going to refer to them from now on I think, doesn't even make any sense otherwise.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's also important people understand it's the same as "the cloud".

That's how the rollout started: "why pay for a hard drive when you can have it anywhere"?

Too many people fell for that, so the corps bought up all the hard drives, now storage is more expensive than when "the cloud" rolled out

They're using startup accounting against us, they'll buy up all the storage/compute power so consumers have no option but to go thru them.

The only way to win is wide scale boycotts till their investors give up. Don't use anything you don't own to store data.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

Setting the table for water wars

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok I have a solution. Don't build the data centres then, I'm ok with not having data centres in the country or anywhere else really, but I'll settle for them not being here.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Or you can cool them using raw seawater since year around it's cold AF and is well below the minimum temp needed. It's just cheaper and less permits to use drinking water in evaporative coolers... And that's besides the point too, since do we really need more AI datacenters when there isn't a silver bullet use case? It's been 5 years and there's still no killer app for AI, just vague hand waving at certain jobs (which also quietly rehire their staff months later for some odd reason)

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And so sets the first domino leading to the water wars of our future.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I sold glycol and grey water data centers 20 yrs ago. Can someone eli5 why water is the crux of the consumption?

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Better solutions have always and will always exist, but they cost more to implement.

Piping grey water to a data center either means placing it somewhere with an appropriate pipe with appropriate filtration performed, or building a new pipe/filtration. Drinking water in comparison is easily accessible anywhere. They don’t care about the impact or even the per unit cost, they just want to build on the cheap and take advantage of local infrastructure, and they figure in this ai boom the actual running costs are irrelevant because ai companies will pay for anything that works, efficiency be damned

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I was thinking about onsite recycling if that makes a difference. But yeah, it makes sense the path of least resistance is what you described.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because it is cheap and government pay for infrastructure and maintenance. If these company would have to pay for the public goods they use none would be profitable.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The problem is they are heavily subsidised currently so they don't actually care about using the cheaper more environmentally friendly solution. The easiest solution is to just hook the mains water supply into the cooling pumps and have the output go down a drain. The fact that it costs 100 bajillion quid a minute, they don't care about because they don't pay that.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Understood. That makes sense.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago

I don't know the deals they made. I dunno k if the Greg water network is every where.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just add more hose pipe bans and blame the tax payer for the low river levels. Dispute water companies wasting billions of litres, polluting our water ways and refusing to build infrastructure like reservoirs

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't they just use rust proof pipes and sea water?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 week ago

That would cost too much money for the poor companies.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jfc how hard is it to pass a law requiring a closed loop system? Ban evaporation and you're good.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Big data centres can't dissipate the amount of heat they generate without evaporating water, so a ban like that would effectively be a ban on that kind of data centre. Obviously, the companies lobbying for data centres to get built wouldn't be happy about that.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Surely they could, just need a bigger heat exchanger. Or even place them near the sea and use that as a heat exchanger. Evaporative cooling also isn't going to work as well in the UK where humidity is high.

But IIRC a lot of this water use stuff is kinda sketchy calculations. Building them takes a lot of water due to all the concrete but it is a one off cost and just as bad as building any other large building.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You can theoretically just use a bigger heat exchanger, but it goes from being about the size of the roof the data centre's going to have anyway to way bigger than the data centre, so with UK land prices, it's not remotely financially viable. It's a similar story with dumping heat into the sea. Anywhere close enough to the sea to feasibly dump heat that's also flat enough to build a data centre and has a significant electricity supply is already going to be full of valuable housing or existing industry, so it's not going to be cheap. We're not like America where there's loads of unused land just outside of towns.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I see no problem here.