this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
146 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30590 readers
2497 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 94 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Did he learn his lesson Susan? Go fuck yourself.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The sad thing is Platner still was the more ethical choice.

Hopefully Troy Jackson can catch up..

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago

Every time I say this, I get stomped into a mud hole.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Hopefully Troy Jackson can catch up…

Unfortunately I think he either has hit, or is close to hitting the tipping point and returning to his more conservative views.

He's almost 60, started as a Republican around 40ish? And kept conservative views even after switching to D.

Like, he's just at that age where the brain starts losing critical thinking. When that happens the brain falls back on younger habits and patterns instead of trying to solve every new thing as a new thing.

It's just how the brain works.

Bernie is an outlier because when he was 20 he was in the civil rights movement, him falling back on old habits and patterns isn't that bad, because we still have the same problems.

If/when Jackson returns to his initial political views...

He entered politics as a Republican to protest against immigrants.

Maine deserves better. And they just got fucked.

Playner could have won the election, then stepped down and Maine could get a special election.

Instead the state party (run by Florida fuckups) picked a candidate that's going to only get more conservative over the next 6 years of the term he was handed.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

For whatever fucking reason, Maine seems to love conservatism (case-in-point, Collins reelected since forever).

I guess at least Jackson is younger than Collins

And at least he says he won't support Schumer's reelection, big win for me:

Troy Jackson, who is expected to become the Democratic nominee for Senate in Maine, said he would not support Senator Chuck Schumer of New York to continue as the party’s leader in the chamber. Mr. Jackson also said that he was not sure he would want Mr. Schumer’s help in the general election.

Mr. Jackson made his most definitive rejection of Mr. Schumer to date in an interview on Monday with The New York Times.

“The Democratic Party needs to have a different approach — getting people back in the party, getting working-class, everyday people back in the party — and I don’t believe it’s going to happen with Senator Schumer,” he said.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party needs to have a different approach — getting people back in the party, getting working-class, everyday people back in the party — and I don’t believe it’s going to happen with Senator Schumer,” he said.

Emphasis added. Codeword for so-called "moderates" (conservatives.) he's probably going to be worse than Fetterman

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Isn't that even what DSA wants to do? You need to unite the working-class, which means also reaching out to those people and bringing them back into the party. Whether or not that means appealing to their ignorance, or reframing the problem is ambiguous, but I think pointing the finger at Schumer (as opposed to say, Mamdani) is a good sign.

Honestly if it's done through actually helping people it's fine, the thing is though that the end goal should be to bring in disaffected folks who aren't directly aligned with either party and shore up existing voters. Going for Republicans is broadly a lost cause unless steps are taken to shit can their propaganda networks so ideological drift can cause regional base splitting.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Exactly what DNC wants to happen. Hell majority of them are right of Regan on policy. So I am not shocked they are championing another former Republican. Just like Elizabeth Warren is also former Republican. She was one while Regan was president and stayed that until the Clinton's took the Democrats to the right.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago

[Platner] could have won the election, then stepped down and Maine could get a special election.

...like they could've done with Biden. Instead, they switched candidates and further confirmed the rule that it 100% fails when you switch candidates to try and get around the idea that voters can't choose the least worse of exactly two fucking options.

This is gonna go really well. Best case, people get another Fetterman.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 days ago

This is all going to get much worse before it gets any better.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

She's very concerned.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For the love of all that is holy, I hope that headline is a metaphor.

[–] Townlately@feddit.nl 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Idk, I assume "badly" is the only way he screws

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

It's why he normally sticks to kids, they're easier to impress.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Did you SOBS really have to plant that mental image? /s but not /s

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

I never want to see an image of "Trump badly screws Susan Collins."

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Gotta love how all it took was a guy getting shot in his car to take the Maine race all the way from "100% going to win" to "100% going to lose" and then to "maybe Schumer's homophobic, Bibi-approved replacement candidate can win." Truly gripping politics

[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 10 points 6 days ago

How is this guy "Schumer's pick"? He literally said he wouldn't vote for Schumer as majority leader

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Jackson is not how you describe him. He is endorsed by DSA and Bernie as well. If Schumer and the DNC had it their way they'd have a rabid zionist up there libsplaining why the jewish identity trumps all civil rights of all arabs because the holocaust or some stupid shit, even though his version of Jewish identity is a racist caricature which just boils down to a jewish supremacist zionazi.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't like Jackson and I hate the way this went down...

But he's not "pro-Israel".

He hasn't been outspoken against them, but he hasn't really held an office where his opinion on it is relevant.

And he did sign "the peoples pledge" when he was running for Governor.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago

You're right, he's just homophobic. He said that the drone murder of a Palestinian child was "unconscionable." Zero call for the dissolution of the Israeli state, Band-Aid on a bullet hole. There's no doubt in my mind what Schumer's pick will actually be voting for

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

take the Maine race all the way from “100% going to win” to “100% going to lose”

It didn't happen within six weeks of the election, so there's a good chance all this news gets flushed down the memory hole by election day. Every election cycle we play this game. It's six months of horrific headlines, a one-month lull, and then a sudden gusher of October Surprise Fascist Friendly media.

I do think that Dems in Maine are enjoying something like a 5-10 pt polling advantage, in no small part thanks to the aggressive GOTV and organizing the state's progressive movement has embarked upon. So I don't want to be a doomer and say this is Collins's race to lose. It's a Blue Year in what is shaping up to be a Blue State.

But people have been swinging and missing on Collins for over 20 years. She's a snake and you can't count her out until inauguration day.

[–] Aedaz_@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

She’s got nothing left now.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io -5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are vastly overestimating how much stupid voters care about ICE murders. There are many who either don't care at all or celebrate when they happen, and certainly wouldn't vote for a Democrat because of chaos in ICE policy. It doesn't affect them personally.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

There's more information after you click the headline...

Collins credited herself for getting Mullin to end the vehicle stops by agents that have spawned many killings on the streets of U.S. cities, including the deaths of American citizens.

Only hours later, Trump abruptly reversed Mullin’s decision, decreeing that Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s reviled tactics will continue. “We CANNOT give up one of ICE’s most important and effective Crime Fighting tools, THE TRAFFIC STOP!” Trump raged. The stops resumed, undercutting Collins’s effort to project deep concern about the killing.

In case you did read it but it didn't make sense:

trump supporters would have liked that she talked to trump, but she said they'd stop doing pullovers, which they either liked or didn't like.

Then literal hours later, trump said the opposite.

That doesn't just mean they disagree, which would be bad for her turn out anyways, it means trump doesn't care what she says, to the point of apparently not even noticing she released a statement.

certainly wouldn’t vote for a Democrat because of chaos in ICE policy.

Jesus fucking christ...

Why do people think we need voters to change parties in a midterm?

Collins is top of the ballot in Maine, this is about turnout, if she's not lockstep with trump, trump voters won't turn out for her.

That's why turnout matters, especially in midterms.