this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
202 points (100.0% liked)

News

38507 readers
2550 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/67529

The Department of Justice is trying to prosecute a man allegedly involved in the movement against Atlanta’s Cop City for using a “duress” password on his smartphone that reportedly wiped its contents, in a seemingly unprecedented line of prosecution as the Trump administration expands its methods of criminalizing those with left-wing beliefs. According to The Guardian, the defendant…

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

They charge all day to ruin lives, they don't convict. They earnestly want to convict, but they are failures. Broken system allows them to "win" either way, without consequence.

Here's hoping for a Nuremberg sequel to get the chuds "just following orders"

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 37 minutes ago

I'd have faith in the jury to release him but you see, my faith in humanity is shot

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

What were the general thoughts on "Burn Bags" before this digital/tech issue came up? If it's my shit, I'll choose to burn it or not. My choice. Same goes for cellphones.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago

“We tried to violate this person’s fourth amendment rights and failed, so now we want to put them in prison as a warning to others. You have no more rights, you fucking livestock.” - US Department of Injustice

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope Legal Eagle does an episode on this. All the articles I read are light on the legality of all this. SCOTUS has repeatedly and recently ruled that you don't have the same rights at the boarder as you do in the interior.

I notice that his lawyers are arguing the 5th and 6th amendments, apparently because the 4th is weaker at the boarder?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

the 4th is weaker at the boarder?

He was in an Atlanta airport, though, over a thousand miles from the border.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 39 minutes ago (1 children)

Border or point of entry I think

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 27 minutes ago

That's just cheating

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago

They try to claim that international airports count as borders.

Add that to the "within 100 miles of a border" bullshit, and basically the entire US is in the zone. It's stupid and it's completely intentional.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I believe (I'm not a lawyer) that an international airport counts as "the border," legally speaking.

I don't understand the history or the legal reasoning, but the fourth amendment is moot at the border. That sucks, but it's not new.

Under what is typically referred to as the “border search exception” to the Fourth Amendment, federal officers may generally conduct warrantless searches of persons and items upon their entry into the United States without needing reasonable suspicion or probable cause of wrongdoing.1 The Supreme Court has stated, “[t]hat searches made at the border, pursuant to the longstanding right of the sovereign to protect itself by stopping and examining persons and property crossing into this country, are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border, should, by now, require no extended demonstration.”

-- Searches at International Borders, LII

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's not draconian oppression at all! Nope! 🤦🏻😡

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago

I just want to know what a phone can smuggle into the United States.

These search laws are for contraband, large amounts of cash, human and animal trafficking and untaxed goods.

None of that requires unlocking a phone and the if SCOTUS wasn’t a bullshit rubber stamp for the fascists, it would make that clear.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Ahh but don't you see everything is the border.

I know they have jurisdiction anywhere within a hundred miles of the border, I think, and also at airports.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, an area covering the places where over half of the population lives.

Remember when Republicans were up in arms over the country becoming a police state rather than cheering for it? Pepperidge Farm does.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

They were never serious about that.

The dipshits that actually believe(d) in that were just talking about Barack/Hillary/Bill/Joe coming for their guns or their Bibles or some other fantasy version of those Democrats and their policies.

Shoving gays back in the closet and invalidating their marriages, murdering trans, deporting brown people and forcing xtianity on everyone: that's just freedom.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They should charge the officer who entered the given password for criminal stupidity instead...

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

So what if you delete before they ask. I guess you could say it was acting up.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

As someone else mentioned, you probably shouldn't affix the duress password to the back of the phone with a sticker for the officer to discover.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

weekly formats. "it's routine, sir." is a viable defense

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 15 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder if you could get charged for traveling with an almost empty phone

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 12 hours ago

Buy a cheap phone to carry around and just never activate it.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they'll make it a crime not to carry evidence of something they think you should have evidence of.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Federal mandatory social media account

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised if that becomes a thing. Black mirror here we go!

[–] androidul@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

is Julian Assange free yet?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago

Yes, the current Australian PM eventually came and got him.

...but really, Assange was spreading Russian disinformation to help Donald Trump into power... So a pretty dubious character.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yes, though I don't suppose he'll ever be free of surveillance by various countries' intelligence agencies.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

The future of authentic humanity doesn't include the United States of Americas culture.