this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
37 points (97.4% liked)

Europe

11673 readers
795 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“No area can be exempt,” an official in Berlin said ahead of the visit, arguing that net contributor states – those who put more into the Brussels coffers than they get out – already finance roughly three quarters of the EU budget.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Melchior@feddit.org 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Calling for cuts all over the place, just shows that you have no idea where you can actually save money specifically. Obviously an organization as large as the EU has some waste, but if he actually knew his stuff, then he would make specific proposals. This is just dumb.

There are areas, where giving the EU more money would be a good idea. The military comes to mind.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

He doesn't need to save money in the first place. His government took on a historic amount of debt to invest in infrastructure and economy to get revenues up... then wasted it all on tax cuts and subsidies for their rich buddies instead to then cry about the need to demolish social systems to save money.

[–] Melchior@feddit.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Yes he does. Namely by not wasting it on his rich buddies.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

Corpo whore

[–] cambelin61@feddit.org 26 points 19 hours ago

He really is a local politician from Sauerland disguised as chancelor.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago
[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The European Commission’s proposed 60% increase in spending, Merz argued, was simply unaffordable and “impossible to justify at a time when virtually all member states are making enormous efforts to consolidate their public finances”.

I hate to agree with Merz, but what he really says is not that there should be cuts, but rather that the hugely increased new budget proposal is not in line with the current economic situation and should be revised to something more similar in size to the current budget.

[–] kossa@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, that debate was basically settled already in 1936ff by Keynes

Kind of a telltale sign that conservatives still don't get the message almost 100 years later.

[–] HaiZhung@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Cutting spending by government will cool down the economy even more.

Someone’s spending is another one’s income.

Who else is supposed to spend if companies are downsizing, private households are cutting spending, and government is cutting spending?

I feel like the world collectively forgot Keynes‘ economics theory. The whole austerity cycle is madness.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

It's more efficient if the member states invest then when the funds get stuck in the bureaucracy of the EU Commission.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“No area can be exempt,”

Except arms, right?

[–] modem_down@thebrainbin.org 2 points 15 hours ago

The article has an interesting passage about how Irish aluminium is currently being sold to Russia for weapons, and the EU is (rightly) trying to stop this.