this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
106 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

16260 readers
1221 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration’s plans to stymie and defund bike lane plans in the US, on the unusual basis that they are DEI tools, will hurt efforts to improve roadway safety, non-motorized transportation advocates say.

The transportation secretary, Sean Duffy, posted on X this month that he had redirected $1.73bn allocated for “Biden-era DEI pet projects” to “America’s actual backbone: ROADS, BRIDGES, AND SHIPPING PORTS”.

Duffy did not explain how the transportation department would determine which bike lanes support diversity, equity and inclusion. The administration also recently removed bike lanes and speed cameras from the Federal Highway Administration’s list of proven safety countermeasures.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

"DEI bike lanes" anyone unironically saying this should throw themselves into an active volcano for the benefit of humanity

[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I’d feel bad.

For the volcano.

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

It’s insane how they can just say this stuff and don’t simply get laughed at by everyone who has any say over it.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 13 points 15 hours ago

They know this. They want this. People who feel less safe are more stressed out, they make worse choices, they feel less in control of their lives, they become more willing to hand control over to an authoritarian or less able to keep up with what authoritarians are doing. Socially impoverishing the population is policy because it creates the an environment that can be more easily taken advantage of. Almost all of their choices follow this pattern.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What a limp headline. "advocates say". No. Data says.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 3 points 13 hours ago

You have to both sides those with the data and credentials to speak with authority on a subject, and idiots. No idea why, but it's very important that idiots get to spout their insane brain farts.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

The administration also recently removed bike lanes and speed cameras from the Federal Highway Administration’s list of proven safety countermeasures.

As in it's not longer proven safe? Didn't know research results came with an expiration date.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

This will make traffic worse. This harms even the braindead morons who are cheering for this.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

the gas wasted in traffic not going anywhere is gas that must be replaced, and the fuckwits will keep cheering as they pony-up for another $100 fill-up .

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 5 points 17 hours ago

I know, I know, bicycle lanes are spreading LGBTQ+ and are communists. Right?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

potentially used by the poor and/or progressives more frequently than by dumb af maga cult members, so automatically becomes 'dei'

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

they mean make it more safe for cars. they don't care about bikes. the auto manufacturers lobbyed hard to make laws and public sentiment favor the motorist.

[–] wraithcoop@programming.dev 10 points 17 hours ago

It's not more safe for cars, though. Maybe safer for Big Oil.