this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
892 points (98.6% liked)

World News

57561 readers
1209 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 264 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’m sure it has nothing to do with the billionaire pedophiles not giving a fuck.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course not. It’s not enough people recycling their grocery bags.

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not to say you shouldn’t recycle.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

Of course not. But it does feel a little silly when there are town-sized data centres being built in every direction and billionaires are just “choosing” to break all laws. Meta’s got gas turbines running to power theirs and they just said they’re gonna do it for another year. Who’s gonna stop ‘em? Everyone is too busy working and trying to survive to stop them from pretty literally torching our futures and especially our children’s futures.

Things will need to get pretty bad before we see any kind of justice or change of direction, I fear ☹️

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone 190 points 1 week ago (3 children)

'Sharp acceleration' meaning 75% faster warming in the last decade compared to the 40 years previous, and blowing past the 1.5° target in 3-4 years. No speculation was given, but I think it's likely we're seeing the limits of oceanic absorption of co2 and heat. The ocean's latent heat capacity has flattened the curve for more than a century, and it's very hard to predict when that will run out, but sea surface temperatures spiking all over have been good evidence that we have passed a major tipping point in the last few years.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

They also banned sulphur oxide in ship fuel which would have had a cooling effect, that was hiding the full extent of the damage and is slowly dissipating

Won’t be long until we start doing that again on purpose

[–] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

Good news is cloud seeding is viable? Bad news is we're probably gonna need it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rf_@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (20 children)

I’ve read that the models used to predict the rate of change were too optimistic or an assumption about them was too conservative and thus not very realistic. Now we have data showing the models under-predicted the rate of change, so one argument is that we were already on this path since decades ago, we just didn’t model it right.

In any case, we’re all fucked so who gives a shit anyway no?

Is there a name for when we know what the right thing to do is but we keep not doing it?

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmyAye@nord.pub 139 points 1 week ago (21 children)

I just wish people would stop acting like I am a "Doomer" over this shit.

Every year its record high summers and winters, tnado alley is moving, rain patterns are all fucked up, I am not even a professional and I can tell the extreme weather shifts from climate change are happening.

[–] lordziv 57 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I've tried having this same conversation with my mum multiple times and she keeps saying that there has been no meaningful increase in temperatures in her lifetime and I'm just thinking what are you talking about?! I just don't understand what they stand to lose by admitting that humans have demonstrably increased the global temperatures.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Some level of personal guilt for continuing to exist in a system where fossil fuels are burned on their behalf and we often need to burn them ourselves to live a nornal life because the alternatives may barely exist. For example see DEI bike lanes in the states and the banning of them in ontario in canada thus promoting more car use and discourage/making it more dangerous to bike.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember that the fossil fuel industry knew what was going to happen in the 1970s and lied to governments around the world to ensure our future of maximal fossil fuel burning and damn the consequences came to pass.

We have words for people who betray their country, we have words for people who betray their family, we even have words for people who betray the firm they work for every day, but we have no words for people who betray their entire species.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 88 points 1 week ago (6 children)

We're all trying to find who did this

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

1.5°C Threshold Could Be Exceeded Before 2030

Come to Europe one of these days. We're at 2.3°C.. Come and see our cities getting closer to temperatures of Phoenix, or the many forest fires, the droughts, powerplants shutting down because of a lack of water, transportation issues. The idiots saying more CO2 being good for plants can ask the farmers how things are going. We're not having a good summer.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

This is the forecast for the next 5 days in Vienna/Austria. Last week was the same. I am fucking exhausted.

image

Cant wait for Friday.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sadly we're now at the "I told you so" phase of global warming and much sooner than expected. Now it's a case of how bad are things going to get.

We still haven't even peaked in terms of global emissions per year, let alone meaningfully reduced them. Then even after reducing from the peak, we really need to get to net 0, which seems impossible right now.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 32 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've been in spectator mode for a while now once I realized the trend. Act locally, know your neighbors, become as self-sufficient as you can. Not much else you can do that will have actual effect.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kinther@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The thing that doesn't get called out enough is that many greenhouse gasses have a lag time before they actually start causing heat. CO2 for example takes about 20 years if I recall correctly. So we are seeing the results of what was emitted years ago... not necessarily the current emissions.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Really? I've never heard of this, and I'm a climate scientist.. Not saying it's definitely wrong, but a citation would be good.

Edit: Huh, seems it's true: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/031001 although that is for large pulses of CO2, I don't know how that translates into a constant stream of emissions..

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 1 week ago

But at least we made a bunch of grotesque genocidal pedophiles obscenely wealthy.

[–] bobbbu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (42 children)

There is some hope if we chip at it as much as we can. No action is too small:

  • less travelling. Life is fun near home. Happiness isn't tied to an airplane and a beach far away
  • eat less animals. You ll get used to whatever diet in a few weeks. It doesnt have to be vegan or nothing. Also, beans are delicious:)
  • bamboo toilet paper. Grows fast, renewable.
  • plant bushes, trees. Look up local resilient species. I've been planting everywhere I can. You can call your local municipality, they have regreening programs.
  • buy less stuff. Available tech is already good enough.
  • vote with your wallet. This is the only real power we have over corporations, imo. Lots of great easy to repair brands. Fair trade, etc.

If we convince ourselves we are screwed, we ll give up. Be the hero of your own story. YOU DO NOT NEED TO GET IT 100% RIGHT. Any improvement is improvement. We all live different lives, and the economy is hard on alot of us.

I believe:)

Edit: I get that industries/billionaires represent a majority of this issue. I also believe that change starts home. We gotta tackle this at every level, even if it seems lost. The alternative is watching it happen and wait for the others to change. This is a prime "tragedy of the common" problem. You drink filtered tap water? Well those plastic bottles dont get made, thrown away. Do this a lifetime and those bottles represent a hill of waste that never existed.

I m rooting for you, for us!

[–] chinaski@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Unfortunately, you missed the mark. The individual is not the problem and will not make an iota of difference.

Billionaires are the enemy. They are useless. They are pitting the average citizen against one another. There is no good billionaire.

https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/billionaires-emit-more-carbon-pollution-90-minutes-average-person-does-lifetime

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Individual action was a myth designed by FF companies to shift responsibility

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

and yes, more putting the onus on us, when all of our individual yearly pollution barely amounts to a day of pollution released by average industry.

You know it was industrial propaganda that started the whole personal responsibility thing to begin with right? to shift blame away from themselves and onto you and me.

I mean, yeah, you can make yourself feel good by reducing, but its doing fuckall compared to industrial release.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
[–] Polyphilic@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Data centers fix this" -billionaires probably

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if this have anything to do with moving quickly from "we must all limit our energy consumption" to "we must burn as much energy possible for no real purpose".

I guess we'll never know /s

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Crypto farming, feeding the ai bubble, large scale wars of aggression, commuters replacing cars with trucks, buying throwaway junk has never been easier. That's the relatively new completely unnecessary hubris that I can think off atm. These should be the low hanging fruits to just not do, but apparently we're going to continue doing them anyways. If we can't address the low hanging fruits, then tackling the harder challenges will remain a pipe dream until it's too late. Climate stability is fucked, and we're in for a rough ride.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 45 points 1 week ago

Meanwhile, my workplace just announced RTO, starting next year. It's a moderately large, 100% white collar office site.
Gotta drive those CO2 numbers up, baby!

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 44 points 1 week ago

t55Gv1YTRREs9J9.png

Tranlation: Do you remember the level in Super Mario Bros. 3 where the Sun tries to kill you?

This is today.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

During the late 1970's, ExxonMobil scientists predicted global warming would accelerate with use of fossil fuels. They were shockingly accurate and the f'ed up weather patterns are the result. Keep buying and driving gas guzzlers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Even if you ignore anything else, just speak to ANY mountaineer, and they'll all tell you that glaciers are drying up

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] narp@feddit.org 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yearly average global mean surface temperature from five data sources, in two versions: (top) unadjusted, (bottom) adjusted for El Niño/Southern Oscillation, volcanism, and solar variation. All are aligned so that the average from 1991 to 2020 equals 0.88°C, to approximate warming since pre-industrial.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (13 children)

We can't even stop a rise in fascism, an incredibly stupid thing, across the globe. We don't stand a chance against global warming. We're cooked.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We tried capitalism in a hundred different ways and we are all out of ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don't worry guys, AI is gonna save us!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even the billionaire cult conterences shifted from "debunking global warming" to "adapting to global warming".

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have also detected this by the way it is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Before this whole thing goes under, I vote we take it upon ourselves to punish those responsible for destroying this planet for their own greed. All billionaires and trillionaires must go, in a method befitting what they have done. Every member of the board of every oil company should join them. And all politicians who have allowed this should go first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I know people who are having babies now; and to think I was worried what would happen in my lifetime.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Any idea what could be causing this?

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

It’s a mystery, wrapped in an enigma and covered in secret sauce.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] filister@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unfortunately the problem with global warming is that it happens very slowly over time. Scientists were warning us of the impacts of global warming for at least a decade but we have somehow prioritized the short term gains and now we and our children will bear the fruits of our negligence.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Scientists were warning us of the impacts of global warming for at least a decade

They've been warning us with some urgency since at least the 1970s. There were concerns published about it in the late 19th century. By the early 1990s the warnings were loud and clear for everyone to hear.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you think burning more coal would help?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›