this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
356 points (98.6% liked)

Fediverse

43468 readers
189 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

idk it's my first time (kind of) trying to do dataviz, I thought the original post was super interesting but like other comments said, it was hard to read.

I think in a way it's mostly because defederation is complex to show as links, since it is the break of said link, but hopefully this type of graph is better ?

you do lose the "group" of instances view, though (and also I did not bother with per instance MAU as raw number + percentage, or sofware used)

let me know what you think!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A bit scarier than the previous one at first glance, but the single line explanation including everything needed to understand makes it easier to read.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something though, I think it'd be better to have a cut-off of MAU or some other relevance metric, as otherwise smaller instances defederating from major ones may sneakily make the major one seem more isolated than it really is.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or scale arrow size by MAU, I don't know.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 8 points 1 week ago

That sounds like a great idea, that's some of the most important information.

[–] ozoned@piefed.social 38 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I know lots of folks look at this and see a shattering of the what they expect. The Fediverse is NOT a platform. Lemmy.world is NOT the Threadiverse. Let's break these bonds. I left a server because I was suspected of being a CIA plant. I went to one that was more welcoming. I found they were too strict for me on their rules. I left that. I'm not on piefed.social. I'm planning on running my own piefed for ME and MY family/friends hopefully SOON^TM. If someone defederates from me, that's ok, they didn't want me to be a part of their community. MY community still exists.

These aren't platforms that are out there trying to save the entire world. They're building a community that interconnects to other communities. Don't like how they're doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

Yes, if you want your stuff to be found you have to advocate for it.

I think the Trek communities are stand outs of how this works and how it should be done. Think of like old Forum days. Normally folks would create a forum for a specific topic and other thigns would go other places. But now those forums connect and you can run your own and connect to everyone.

Break this idea that this major pillars disconnecting are fracturing the fediverse. IMO the more small instances we have the stronger the network.

So build a Piefed/Lemmy/Mastodon/GoToSocial/Bonfire whatever for your community and then allow those to connect out to others.

The idea of this change is scary though. And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we can't exist the way I hope we do. But I think humans strive for community and communication and we have a new way to provide it to them.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 25 points 1 week ago

Besides, and related to "not being a platform", it helps break the idea of everyone having to share the same space with everyone. If two groups can't have a healthy relationship, it is healthier for them to cut ties with each other. Meanwhile, the oligarchic platforms being as big and with barely any internal borders makes for the toxic environment of places like Reddit and Twitter that predates recent polemics.

[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Don’t like how they’re doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

Not so easy.
Mostly a liability issue.
First there's security - make sure the server doesn't get compromised.
Then you need to figure out how to deal with illegal content like CSAM (was already a widespread issue on Lemmy at least once, causing multiple instances to shutdown) - even on private instance due to content caching.
And legal issues such as minimum age and privacy regulations that you'd have to comply with.

3rd one is not an issue if you only use it yourself, and perhaps with a couple of friends that won't try to sue you when they get mad.

[–] Bombastic@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Well said, agent Johnson.

God bless the U.S. of A

[–] rimu@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are 500 Lemmy instances and 80 PieFed instances which are too small to show on the graph :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Agreed. Its federated. Let instances do thier thing. It gives us more options not less.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hexbear uses a whitelist so they are not federated with a bunch of these instances besides .world

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

The Hexbear Great Firewall exists to keep the Beanis contained

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I’m kinda surprised that so many instances have defederated from fedinsfw.app It’s just porn, right? Who cares?

Maybe I’m naive and missing an important point. If so, I apologize for my ignorance.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If people want porn there's a million places they can look instead. It makes sense to just remove porn spam from your instance, most people don't really want it in with everything else. Also, it's harder to moderate or find people willing to moderate it.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Okay. Those all sound like good reasons. Thanks!

[–] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i havent seen any of the discussions leading to this, but i assume the sheer amount of images/video takes up a lot of space, so they instances decided to avoid it altogether.

that and potential risks if something particularly unsavory becomes mirrored on your instance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dil@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago

The way the apps and frontends are setup, its easy enough to use alts for different usecases instead of having porn attached to general instances. Seperating gooner personas from regular is a positive imo. Keep that energy on the nsfw instances, banning them isn't like reddit getting rid of a community, everyone still can sign up and access it on the same app they already use. I always hated scrolling on r/all and seeing porn every 5 posts (nsfw tag covers a lot of non porn) Doesn't mean I don't use reddit for porn, I think I wouldve preferred having an alt there that only showed porn subs and vice versa with my main account showing none. Some seperation is healthy imo.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i know blahaj at least defederated it because of "a community for porn of women that appear to be under 18" (direct quotation from a local-only post)

i couldn’t find it myself (there’s a lot of communities on there!) but i’m guessing it’s some sort of "barely legal" porn community, which is gross (but unfortunately very common). so good riddance imo

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] waldfee@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

This graph is indeed a lot more intuitively readable. I think it could be improved further by avoiding needlessly crossing the arrows, like for example pawb.social -> lemmygrad.ml is crossing multiple other arrows, even though they are right next to another. Some arrows could also be shorter to avoid crossings, like beehaw.org -> sh.itjust.works

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm on sh.ijust.works because it has a bad word in it. I don't know what you're all complaining about

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It doesn't even Include https://lemmy.today/ that has no defederation or blocking at all, and has never had, since the admin feels it's up to the user and not the admin to decide these things. You know, free and open internet, remember?

Also one of the best themes of all Lemmy instances if you ask me.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You gotta ask the OOP about that, but my guess is, in a graph that shows instances that defederate, why include an instance that doesn't?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

I see your point I guess. Perhaps defederation is something that users want, and then they are happy to see who does it the most?

Im not like that myself, but I can see the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pika@hikki.team 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Came here to say that!

I can't comprehend why people would join instances in the list. If you don't like a particular instance, just hop into the user settings and block it! Why let others set your blocklist?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This graph is a lot more understandable, but the yellow is hard to see. I can't tell what instance lemmy.ml is defederating.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I assume for you it may be because of your display type. But that made me think of colorblind people and how much this format probably totally excludes them as an entire swath of the population

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

But that made me think of colorblind people and how much this format probably totally excludes them as an entire swath of the population

I'm colorblind. It does :/

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

I like this representation a lot.

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The similar color makes it slightly difficult to read but the graph is better, and easier to understand. Anyways, you are skilled, good job :3

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So why does everyone hate lemmygrad and hexbear? I'm out of the loop on that.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

tankie bullshit

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hexbear originated from ChapoTrapHouse fandom which is a part of the so-called dirtbag left that explicitly antagonizes (neo)liberals. They also don't use downvotes and encourage users to voice their opinions instead.

So every wave of redditor freaks the hell out when they get a handful of hexbear users clowning on some take like it's a coordinated brigade attack.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

they are too extreme for the normal extremists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago

What a mess. Not the graph, just all the netsplits in general.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be cool to have something like the internet map but of the fediverse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

In addition to comments others have made about some of the colors being difficult to see/differentiate, I think it would be worthwhile to distinguish one-way defederation from mutual defederation, perhaps with a texture?

It would make the graphic busier, but I also would enjoy seeing population percentages next to each instance name (to give weight to the significance of certain defederations, e.g. how much of the fediverse are you excluding by defederating with hexbear vs lemmy.world).

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I find this much harder to read than the previously posted diagram, and it contains less information.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, despite the problems with the other one, I found it easier to read. This one has too many crossing connections, and loses the groups.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

This makes much more sense thanks

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a very clear visualization. I do agree that some indication of the scale/activity of the instances would be a nice addition.

I also think you should add a date, as the relationships and active servers will likely change over time. If you keep it up, eventually you'll have a collection that illustrates the changes.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have to say, now it's even more amusing to hear people claim '.world is a bunch of narrow minded [whatevers] who block all opinions they don't like' (2 instances 😱)

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 5 points 1 week ago

2 of the major instances in this graph. They might block many more that are smaller but I didn't check.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Ah, thankyou! As a lazy person not sure who my instance was blocking, I now know. Excellent. Better find an instance who doesn't block any instances.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Now I am curious what is going on in fedinsfw.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Legal risk. Being federated means mirroring the content locally and that can cause liability for the instance owner. Laws around porn can vary by country and to some being federated could be illegal, or be an unreasonable risk.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Reposting porn from other sites i assune

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I notice that it presents sites with the same editorial body as separate cases, such as piefed.ca and lemmy.ca. Perhaps it would make sense and potentially improve readability to collapse any cases that have the same in and out arcs as each other. (So, all the cases that have no blocks and only block lemmygrad as one collapsed entry, for example.)

[–] rimu@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Cool diagram.

If you removed hexbear and lemmygrad (nearly everyone defederates them so they just clutter the place up) then the other information would be clearer. For example I didn't notice that beehaw has defederated both lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works until my third viewing.

load more comments
view more: next ›