575
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 3 weeks ago

Fortunately I have rank choice voting, so I can vote for the progressive candidates first and also the center-right Democratic candidates after

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

rank choice voting

So jealous. The people here want to sell Prop Rep, and it's baffling for regular folks.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Don't worry I will anyone who isn't an AIPAC shill or centrist will have my vote.

[-] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

You need to include AIPAC adjacent, they are just one of many PACs backing Israel. And there's a handful doing the work of AIPAC for free

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

As is tradition.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

No. I won't. I'm paying attention to the people left of center. Fuck dems.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

You can influence the Dems to move to the left, or you can help the fascists. Those are the real choices.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] core@leminal.space 5 points 3 weeks ago

For a while now the Ds have been owned by corpos. They support the establishment and that stance is as far left as center right, and many times far less left than that's. A lot of D candidates have R policies with some lip service to left ideology. The governor of MI was caught saying she didn't care what the people wanted about data centers, she'll make a deal to build them anyway. Gavin Newsom is positioning himself as a presidential candidate and he's about as corpo establishment as someone can get. So when the choice is a corporate owned candidate thats either far right or center right, its not really a choice. I won't vote blue no matter who b/c that just enables and empowers Ds to continue acting like they currently are.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think it'd be a lot easier and smarter for Bernie to convince the centrist dem leadership to stop supporting genocide and at least pretend to give a crap about the needs of the voters than bernie asking all dem voters to support genocide (thats implicitely what he is doing if we are real about his ask) and to support a dem party that ignores the peoples needs.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Why would the centrist leadership do what they are paid not to do? This shift won't happen through convincing but through losses of centrists in primariea and victories of progs in generals.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
575 points (97.7% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS