this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
62 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

87279 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] XLE@piefed.social 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why does Binance get to enjoy all the legal benefits of being a corporation, and all the benefits of trading cryptocurrency, and none of the downsides of either?

[–] dwazou@jlai.lu 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They were prosecuted for money laundering.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-68930465

The problem is that the legal punishment was too mild. The CEO spent 4 months in a luxury prison for white collar criminals. Basically a social club for the rich.

So now he is doing the same thing all over again.

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

If i robbed a watermelon on the local supermarket i would get more prison time than that. The US legal system is a joke

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

Law enforcement shouldn't become too convenient ("The company built a staff of hundreds of compliance officers, many of them veterans of U.S. and European law enforcement agencies. The police could often get information about accounts far faster from Binance than they could from banks."), but equally not be excessively hindered by procedures or cronyist governments ("[...] unable to obtain account records from some Binance users based in the United Arab Emirates. [...] certain information requests flow through the Emirati government [...] conflict of interest, because the investment firm MGX is funded by Abu Dhabi royals."); so I'm quite mixed on the change of direction.

It might be positive for legitimate users of the platform (which are less likely to be investigated, let alone receive specialty-treatment), but simultaneously protect Trump's crypto-scamming inner circle, alongside other high-value targets.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 1 points 5 days ago

🅱️inance