844
GitDown is Hub (lemmy.nz)
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 145 points 1 week ago

Congrats to GitHub on achieving one 9 availability

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Let's party like it's 1999-12-31T23:59:59!

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

We all had our computers turned off due to the Y2K bug.

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Eyyyyy this guy gets it.

[-] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

UTC of course

[-] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

You should've seen me: πŸ’ƒ but also "LET'S BURN THIS MOTHER (world) DOWN!!! 😈"

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 32 points 1 week ago

9.99% is still three nines so

[-] plateee@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago

psssh. My homelab is six 9s uptime: 9.99999%

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 week ago

Hey look, they have 2 9's. Sure they're not next to each other......

[-] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 week ago

Git Down, Git Down 🎡

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
git: "Down" is not a git command. See 'git --help'
[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

Because there was a former employee active shooter.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Kids today will never know the joy of writing apps for Blackberry. You wrote them in Java, which was cool and the gang, but when you tried to compile your app and deploy it to your test device, every library module you incorporated into your app had to be signed independently by RIM's signing servers. If you were lucky this took a few minutes; if you were unlucky it took 45 minutes to an hour. If you were really really lucky it never happened at all because one or more of these signing servers were completely down, and then you could just tell your manager that the signing server was down and go home for the day.

And this would happen even if you'd only changed a single line of code. I got in the habit of making an enormous number of changes before running and testing anything, which is obviously not an ideal practice but was completely necessary in this case. I would also sometimes roll my own code to avoid having to include a particular module. My custom UI, for example, needed to use trigonometry functions but these were part of one of the cryptography library modules which were especially notorious for taking forever to sign. So I wrote my own sin() function instead.

This was probably the main reason Blackberrys were murdered by iPhones, even more than their tiny screens with 16-bit color that RIM refused to upgrade until it was too late. iPhone app development also sucked thanks to its antiquated C-style language, but it was still lightyears beyond Blackberry. RIM was going around offering cash bonuses to developers to write apps for them (my company was offered $30,000 by them) but it still wasn't even close to being worth it.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh gosh you just triggered my memories of the maemo coding scene. Apps were not sandboxed despite it being a linux device (read: just assign every app its own user...), so to get anything published in Testing you'd wait hours for the build server to tell you that your app did not compile (despite it compiling fine in the SDK) and then a hours to days to get a green light that the app will be uploaded into the repo.

Small changes/hotfixes? Forget about it, same process

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

History tends to repeat itself

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

$ send_bot_cmd.sh --attack GitHub.com --waitfor=up

Oh no, whatever will they do?

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

This man just saved the world

[-] Dialectical_Specialist@quokk.au 16 points 1 week ago

Oh thank god! I thought my obtainium setup was borked again

[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago

Why's the news presenter holding a mic whilst he also has a clip mic on his suit jacket?

Oh.. and github was down?

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

He wants to make sure you hear the news that GitHub is down again

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Why is there a presenter in the picture?

weird stock image perhaps?

And here I was expecting the AI to be depressed.

[-] silver@das-eck.haus 6 points 1 week ago

-2 9's incoming

[-] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Its up for me?!?!? who says it down!

[-] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

A "gitt community" (double "t") is, in one of my first languages, a community that thinks highly of themselves while not actually being a noteworthy community at all.

[-] daguma118@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Does anyone know why it’s down?

[-] anzo@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

New cyber defense tech. Just read the post ;)

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
844 points (99.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32965 readers
1670 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS